Student expelled by law school after posting ‘It’s OK to be white’ flyers: report

[Jolly_Penguin]

Not necessarily. Gay men are not sexually attracted to women. That doesn’t mean that they regard women as less equal human beings deserving of less respect or legal or societal protections. Obviously we all know that some gay men are sexist and/or misogynist. Their sexual preferences are independent of any sexist or misogynist attitudes they hold.

Someone may be only sexually attracted to members of a certain racial group but hold no feelings it attitudes that those belonging to those groups are in any way inferior or deserving of lesser rights and protections.

Or they can be not sexually attracted to members of a group because they regard that group as less than human or less deserving of equal rights and protections due to their race. That would be racist.

Plenty of men are sexually attracted to women while finding them undeserving or not needing equal rights and protections as men. That’s sexist and misogynist.

Some may prefer members of certain races because they see them as less deserving of equal rights and protections. That is racist.

Agreed.

And just to add it since you didn't, the same applies regardless of what race the person is and what race they are attracted to, and applies to women as well as to men.

Just got to get that virtue signalling in.

I don't think what Toni said was virtue signalling. And all I did was note that what she said applies to everyone.

 

[laughing dog]

Just got to get that virtue signalling in.

I don't think what Toni said was virtue signalling.

It wasn't.

And all I did was note that what she said applies to everyone.

Thank you for confirming your virtue signalling.

 

[another1]

Cough cough: I would also like to point out that it is extremely misogynistic in addition to being racist.

His requirement implies that a woman can be somehow 'sullied' by her sex partners and that a previous black partner would definitely 'sully' her.

Perhaps he's worried that if she turns up pregnant, the kid will look black and he might get stuck raising a biracial child--although why he didn't also object to previous non-white partners (assuming he is white) I cannot guess.

Perhaps he believes that black men are so well endowed that he would suffer by comparison. In which case, it's a wonder he didn't insist that any previous sexual partner be Asian since that's also a stereotype.

I do understand that racism is far worse than sexism to y'all.

Perhaps he believes that black men are so well endowed that he would suffer by comparison. In which case, it's a wonder he didn't insist that any previous sexual partner be Asian since that's also a stereotype.

You couldn't be more wrong. I didn't read all about it and then incorporate the most politically correct bullshit into my personal beliefs. I lived, and came to my own conclusions. Black men have bigger cocks than any other race, and Asian genitalia is smaller in both genders. Fact of life.

Vaginas do stretch, and we all know what that does. I have stood with thousands of naked black men in the system, and I can tell you that as a white male I physically look like a different species. Picture 3 grapes next to a German sausage. I can totally understand the "sullied" thing, and I don't consider it sexist. OR racist. People have the right to express sexual preferences and you're not woke if you shout misogyny or racism.

In my experience, the Asian stereotype applies to Asian women, too. When i was at a University I met plenty of Asian women who were shipped in on scholarships to bring the schools numbers up. They shipped in like a thousand one semester, and many of them hopped on the first available non-Asian penis. So yeah I'm an expert on that as well. I look forward to researching further but willing sex partners are a hard thing to come by.

You're being judgmental and impractical. When people trip out over the smallest little thing, they miss the big things. Free insult there

 

[laughing dog]

I can totally understand the "sullied" thing, and I don't consider it sexist. OR racist. People have the right to express sexual preferences and you're not woke if you shout misogyny or racism.

Except for health concerns, a partner's past should be irrelevant to one's sexual preferences. It is bigoted to say that one would not have sex with someone who had sexual relations with someone of a particular race.

 

[ronburgundy]

It is quite possible he doesn't care if women he sleeps with had sex with any particular group. Which then kind of makes one wonder, why even bring it up in the first place? Trolls seem to think their trolling needs to be respected.

He posted it in a personal ad on campus. If this is just another one of those "jokes", it is still a racist joke, and a perfectly fine reason to push his racist ass out.

Why assume it was a joke? Maybe it was an honest statement of his sexual preference. And even if that preference is racist, so what? That's not rational grounds to punish somebody. Not unless they push racist actions against others. And if not having sex with somebody is to be considered a racist action, then what do you say to prostitutes who list "no black men" in their adds? Should they be forced to have sex with black men? Its racist for them not to, after all, right?

A racial preference for the people you actually have sex with is not remotely the same as a preference to only have sex with people who have never had sex with anyone of a particular race. The latter is undeniably racist is clearly rooted in notions that everyone of that race is impure and would taint anyone they have sex with. There is no plausible rational for such a prohibition that isn't rooted in racist believes about the inferiority of that race. It is essentially equating an entire race with venereal disease.

 

[another1]

I can totally understand the "sullied" thing, and I don't consider it sexist. OR racist. People have the right to express sexual preferences and you're not woke if you shout misogyny or racism.

Except for health concerns, a partner's past should be irrelevant to one's sexual preferences. It is bigoted to say that one would not have sex with someone who had sexual relations with someone of a particular race.

Nah it is not bigoted to say that I would not have sex with someone who had sexual relations with someone of a particular race. Many women avoid white men because they prefer larger penises. They're not bigots are they? There are lots of examples like that and they all fall under personal preference.

 

[laughing dog]

I can totally understand the "sullied" thing, and I don't consider it sexist. OR racist. People have the right to express sexual preferences and you're not woke if you shout misogyny or racism.

Except for health concerns, a partner's past should be irrelevant to one's sexual preferences. It is bigoted to say that one would not have sex with someone who had sexual relations with someone of a particular race.

Nah it is not bigoted to say that I would not have sex with someone who had sexual relations with someone of a particular race.

Nope you are wrong.

Many women avoid white men because they prefer larger penises. They're not bigots are they?

No, they are stupid. Penis size is not restricted to one race.

There are lots of examples like that and they all fall under personal preference.

Your examples are inappropriate because they refer to the preference for an observable type of person, not their history. Post 145 (above your response) says it pretty well.

 

[krypton iodine sulfur]

Nah it is not bigoted to say that I would not have sex with someone who had sexual relations with someone of a particular race. Many women avoid white men because they prefer larger penises. They're not bigots are they?

If that is their reason, then maybe. They would be selecting partners on the basis of racial stereotypes of questionable validity. I mean, it's their business how they select partners, but that reasoning is racial prejudice.

There are lots of examples like that and they all fall under personal preference.

Personal preference isn't mutually exclusive with bigotry. It's just, deciding whom they are willing to date their sole prerogative regardless.

 

[Toni]

I can totally understand the "sullied" thing, and I don't consider it sexist. OR racist. People have the right to express sexual preferences and you're not woke if you shout misogyny or racism.

Except for health concerns, a partner's past should be irrelevant to one's sexual preferences. It is bigoted to say that one would not have sex with someone who had sexual relations with someone of a particular race.

Nah it is not bigoted to say that I would not have sex with someone who had sexual relations with someone of a particular race. Many women avoid white men because they prefer larger penises. They're not bigots are they? There are lots of examples like that and they all fall under personal preference.

They’re certainly misinformed.

 

[another1]

Yeah and most people lack the life experience to be able to make a fair decision on that. My penis has been inside everything you can think of, and I make my decisions on experience. Not everyone is so lucky, so they base their opinion on what flies with their conscience and the majority's opinion of what is acceptable. They're certainly inexperienced.

 

[Toni]

Yeah and most people lack the life experience to be able to make a fair decision on that. My penis has been inside everything you can think of, and I make my decisions on experience. Not everyone is so lucky, so they base their opinion on what flies with their conscience and the majority's opinion of what is acceptable. They're certainly inexperienced.

I just go with my feelings—and a bit of common sense.

 

[another1]

Nah it is not bigoted to say that I would not have sex with someone who had sexual relations with someone of a particular race. Many women avoid white men because they prefer larger penises. They're not bigots are they?

If that is their reason, then maybe. They would be selecting partners on the basis of racial stereotypes of questionable validity. I mean, it's their business how they select partners, but that reasoning is racial prejudice.

There are lots of examples like that and they all fall under personal preference.

Personal preference isn't mutually exclusive with bigotry. It's just, deciding whom they are willing to date their sole prerogative regardless.

I can't tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing. And I'm not sure if you know yet. I'm the least racist person you will ever encounter, and I'll tell you that some hip hoppy women I avoid like the plague because I know we can't satisfy each other. Turning that into a racism problem is half the problem in the first place. If people can't get over the small stuff they're fucked

 

[krypton iodine sulfur]

If that is their reason, then maybe. They would be selecting partners on the basis of racial stereotypes of questionable validity. I mean, it's their business how they select partners, but that reasoning is racial prejudice.



Personal preference isn't mutually exclusive with bigotry. It's just, deciding whom they are willing to date their sole prerogative regardless.

I can't tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing. And I'm not sure if you know yet. I'm the least racist person you will ever encounter, and I'll tell you that some hip hoppy women I avoid like the plague because I know we can't satisfy each other. Turning that into a racism problem is half the problem in the first place. If people can't get over the small stuff they're fucked

No one is turning anything into anything. At what point did I say there was a 'racism problem'?

You put it up for discussion. I don't know that the term 'bigot' applies necessarily, but it is racial prejudice. That's what it is, so that's what I call it.

some hip hoppy women

I don't know what that means.

 

[another1]

Hip hoppy women are likely to have sex with black men, just to clear that up. If you can't tell which is which, you just haven't lived long enough, or just have no experience with such things. I'm making the point that being selective is not racial prejudice, and I'd argue that calling it that is a prejudice in itself. You said personal preference isn't mutually exclusive with bigotry, and it should be left at that. People are so fucking tender nowadays it's really gonna hurt when someone is actually unfair to them.

To be fair, not all non black women who prefer black men are into hip hop. But the signs of hip hop's cancer will show in many cases. If I actually were racist I would call them nigger lovers. I avoid those people because it is just an unspoken rule. My words look racist to the ignorant I'm sure. I'm starting to recognize that straight white men are the new nigger, and nothing we say is right. The problem is that outspoken people who are inexperienced, uninformed and running low on intelligence are just DYING to show the world how fucking woke they are.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Given this student apparently wanted a girl friend who had not been with a black guy, it is a reasonable deduction. On the otherhand, you have absolutely no evidence to support your claim that this his "Its ok to be white" is some innocent statement.

I would consider categorically not dating a certain race pretty good evidence of racism, to the point where it's hard to give someone the benefit of the doubt. And if a person refuses to date someone who has dated someone of another race, then that is almost certainly racism. Pretty much, there is no other rational explanation.

I do not think the former is proof of racism--if you find a race unattractive you wouldn't want to date them. A far better yardstick in this regard is how would you feel if your daughter dated one of them.

Your second I agree on, I can't see how it could be anything but racism.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Given this student apparently wanted a girl friend who had not been with a black guy, it is a reasonable deduction. On the otherhand, you have absolutely no evidence to support your claim that this his "Its ok to be white" is some innocent statement.

I would consider categorically not dating a certain race pretty good evidence of racism, to the point where it's hard to give someone the benefit of the doubt. And if a person refuses to date someone who has dated someone of another race, then that is almost certainly racism. Pretty much, there is no other rational explanation.

I wouldn't. Some people just don't get it up, and yeah, a lot of that is based on looks. I don't get it up from women, and that doesn't mean I'm a misogynist. A lot of people don't have the stirrings for people with dicks, and that doesn't make them misandrists.

We don't choose who to be horny for, who to be flaccid for.

You did a far better job of addressing this than I did.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

I can totally understand the "sullied" thing, and I don't consider it sexist. OR racist. People have the right to express sexual preferences and you're not woke if you shout misogyny or racism.

Except for health concerns, a partner's past should be irrelevant to one's sexual preferences. It is bigoted to say that one would not have sex with someone who had sexual relations with someone of a particular race.

I disagree. A partner's sexual past does mean something to me. I'm sure you've heard the old bit about you're known by the company you keep--that's how I view prospective partners. Sleeping with trash will lower my evaluation of a person. This has nothing to do with race or economic status.

 

[laughing dog]

I can totally understand the "sullied" thing, and I don't consider it sexist. OR racist. People have the right to express sexual preferences and you're not woke if you shout misogyny or racism.

Except for health concerns, a partner's past should be irrelevant to one's sexual preferences. It is bigoted to say that one would not have sex with someone who had sexual relations with someone of a particular race.

I disagree. A partner's sexual past does mean something to me. I'm sure you've heard the old bit about you're known by the company you keep--that's how I view prospective partners. Sleeping with trash will lower my evaluation of a person. This has nothing to do with race or economic status.

This says a lot more about you than any "trash".

 

[Toni]

Cough cough: I would also like to point out that it is extremely misogynistic in addition to being racist.

His requirement implies that a woman can be somehow 'sullied' by her sex partners and that a previous black partner would definitely 'sully' her.

Perhaps he's worried that if she turns up pregnant, the kid will look black and he might get stuck raising a biracial child--although why he didn't also object to previous non-white partners (assuming he is white) I cannot guess.

Perhaps he believes that black men are so well endowed that he would suffer by comparison. In which case, it's a wonder he didn't insist that any previous sexual partner be Asian since that's also a stereotype.

I do understand that racism is far worse than sexism to y'all.

Perhaps he believes that black men are so well endowed that he would suffer by comparison. In which case, it's a wonder he didn't insist that any previous sexual partner be Asian since that's also a stereotype.

You couldn't be more wrong. I didn't read all about it and then incorporate the most politically correct bullshit into my personal beliefs. I lived, and came to my own conclusions. Black men have bigger cocks than any other race, and Asian genitalia is smaller in both genders. Fact of life.

I don't believe that data supports that assertion.

Vaginas do stretch, and we all know what that does

.

No. We don't.

I have stood with thousands of naked black men in the system, and I can tell you that as a white male I physically look like a different species.

Well, that's not racist.

Picture 3 grapes next to a German sausage.

You shouldn't be so hard on yourself.

I can totally understand the "sullied" thing, and I don't consider it sexist. OR racist.

Of course you don't.

People have the right to express sexual preferences

Of course they do. Even if their preferences are sexist or racist.

You're being judgmental and impractical.

Really? I'm not the one who thinks that having had sex with a black person somehow 'sullies' them.

 

[another1]

Where exactly did you prove me wrong, Toni? We must live in completely different realities because I didn't find that ironic or cute at all. The deadpan way you responded. I just see a completely different reality. Stretching body holes get larger. I did the same to my asshole when I discovered my prostate, so I am an expert on that shit. You spoke of data in your first sentence and proceeded to respond in four word sentences that don't reveal much but your dislike of me. So yeah a different reality and I'm still in the original one where it doesn't matter if your're crude as long as you are right.