Student expelled by law school after posting ‘It’s OK to be white’ flyers: report

[J842P]

Code: a word or phrase chosen in place of another word or phrase in order to communicate an attitude or meaning without stating it explicitly. Iow, the asswipe is the one equating "white" with things that aren't ok, he just doesn't give a shit that they aren't ok and/or thinks they are just fine.

And you know all of this about him and are correct in your creative mind reading because he posted a sign saying "Its ok to be white". Got it.

Given this student apparently wanted a girl friend who had not been with a black guy, it is a reasonable deduction. On the otherhand, you have absolutely no evidence to support your claim that this his "Its ok to be white" is some innocent statement.

I would consider categorically not dating a certain race pretty good evidence of racism, to the point where it's hard to give someone the benefit of the doubt. And if a person refuses to date someone who has dated someone of another race, then that is almost certainly racism. Pretty much, there is no other rational explanation.

 

[repoman]

Given this student apparently wanted a girl friend who had not been with a black guy, it is a reasonable deduction. On the otherhand, you have absolutely no evidence to support your claim that this his "Its ok to be white" is some innocent statement.

I would consider categorically not dating a certain race pretty good evidence of racism, to the point where it's hard to give someone the benefit of the doubt. And if a person refuses to date someone who has dated someone of another race, then that is almost certainly racism. Pretty much, there is no other rational explanation.

Hmm, if there was a white guy who really liked and dated many Chinese and Japanese women and only one white woman for a short time many years ago, then a white woman otherwise interested in him may look at him as a poor prospect and she may be right. Orgasms with particularly featured people may be a strong reinforcing factor for sexual tastes.

She likely won't acquire a disinterest in him because she doesn't want asian cooties.

But this guy might be going down a path similar to Joseph Paul Franklin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Paul_Franklin

 

[Jarhyn]

Given this student apparently wanted a girl friend who had not been with a black guy, it is a reasonable deduction. On the otherhand, you have absolutely no evidence to support your claim that this his "Its ok to be white" is some innocent statement.

I would consider categorically not dating a certain race pretty good evidence of racism, to the point where it's hard to give someone the benefit of the doubt. And if a person refuses to date someone who has dated someone of another race, then that is almost certainly racism. Pretty much, there is no other rational explanation.

I wouldn't. Some people just don't get it up, and yeah, a lot of that is based on looks. I don't get it up from women, and that doesn't mean I'm a misogynist. A lot of people don't have the stirrings for people with dicks, and that doesn't make them misandrists.

We don't choose who to be horny for, who to be flaccid for.

But such secondary (tertiary?) traits as "has dated black people"? That's pretty fucking racist.

 

[Metaphor]

I wouldn't. Some people just don't get it up, and yeah, a lot of that is based on looks. I don't get it up from women, and that doesn't mean I'm a misogynist. A lot of people don't have the stirrings for people with dicks, and that doesn't make them misandrists.

We don't choose who to be horny for, who to be flaccid for.

An interesting turnaround for someone who wrote, and I quote:

I have no problem taking a shit on people who place a hard no on race.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

Code: a word or phrase chosen in place of another word or phrase in order to communicate an attitude or meaning without stating it explicitly. Iow, the asswipe is the one equating "white" with things that aren't ok, he just doesn't give a shit that they aren't ok and/or thinks they are just fine.

And you know all of this about him and are correct in your creative mind reading because he posted a sign saying "Its ok to be white". Got it.

Given this student apparently wanted a girl friend who had not been with a black guy, it is a reasonable deduction.

That he's "a racist, segregationist asshole with fascist tendencies" as Koy insists? No. It really isn't.

On the otherhand, you have absolutely no evidence to support your claim that this his "Its ok to be white" is some innocent statement.

It is on the face of it. If you're going to make derogatory accusations against people, the onus should be on you to prove them, not on the person you are attacking.

 

[laughing dog]

That he's "a racist, segregationist asshole with fascist tendencies" as Koy insists? No. It really isn't.

It is more consistent with the meager evidence we have than your evidence-free defense.

It is on the face of it. If you're going to make derogatory accusations against people, the onus should be on you to prove them, not on the person you are attacking.

This is not occurring in some vacuum - there is no simple "on the face of it". We have other information about this person - information you conveniently ignore.

 

[Jarhyn]

I wouldn't. Some people just don't get it up, and yeah, a lot of that is based on looks. I don't get it up from women, and that doesn't mean I'm a misogynist. A lot of people don't have the stirrings for people with dicks, and that doesn't make them misandrists.

We don't choose who to be horny for, who to be flaccid for.

An interesting turnaround for someone who wrote, and I quote:

I have no problem taking a shit on people who place a hard no on race.

There's a difference between not dating someone of a particular race and vocalizing a hard no publicly.

In reality, I, even as someone who has only ever dated and been attracted to men, and the occasional transman (in fact, every "woman" I've ever felt a stirring for later came out as trans...) I don't place a hard no on women. I'm not committed to "being gay". The heart wants what the heart wants, and I'm not going to deny myself happiness if I find myself surprised*; nobody should and to say that it will never, can never happen is an act of racist hubris. If it happens to end up as categorical, that's what it is. Making the statement preemptively, though, that's pretty racist and I'll gladly shit on such a face.

*I'm happily married. Incidentally, to one of those trans men.

 

[Jarhyn]

Given this student apparently wanted a girl friend who had not been with a black guy, it is a reasonable deduction.

That he's "a racist, segregationist asshole with fascist tendencies" as Koy insists? No. It really isn't.

On the otherhand, you have absolutely no evidence to support your claim that this his "Its ok to be white" is some innocent statement.

It is on the face of it. If you're going to make derogatory accusations against people, the onus should be on you to prove them, not on the person you are attacking.

No, on the face of it, given the context, it is not. It lacks what would necessary to provide a face that would otherwise be innocent.

 

[Metaphor]

An interesting turnaround for someone who wrote, and I quote:

There's a difference between not dating someone of a particular race and vocalizing a hard no publicly.

In reality, I, even as someone who has only ever dated and been attracted to men, and the occasional transman (in fact, every "woman" I've ever felt a stirring for later came out as trans...) I don't place a hard no on women. I'm not committed to "being gay". The heart wants what the heart wants, and I'm not going to deny myself happiness if I find myself surprised*; nobody should and to say that it will never, can never happen is an act of racist hubris. If it happens to end up as categorical, that's what it is. Making the statement preemptively, though, that's pretty racist and I'll gladly shit on such a face.

*I'm happily married. Incidentally, to one of those trans men.

I see. The problem isn't having the preference; the problem is admitting it.

 

[Koyaanisqatsi]

That he's "a racist, segregationist asshole with fascist tendencies" as Koy insists? No. It really isn't.

It is more consistent with the meager evidence we have than your evidence-free defense.

It is on the face of it. If you're going to make derogatory accusations against people, the onus should be on you to prove them, not on the person you are attacking.

This is not occurring in some vacuum - there is no simple "on the face of it". We have other information about this person - information you conveniently ignore.

And even if we had no other evidence and took JP's bullshit "benign" argument at all seriously, it is an inherently bigoted statement as it (a) establishes a particular grouping of people (called "white" people), (b) separates them from any other group, including other "white" people that are not defined, (c) intimates that they are justified in being persecuted (even though, again, it's the other "white" people that are actually guilty) and then (e) assumes the authority to forgive the actions that led to their persecution, because "they" aren't the "white people" that others are really persecuting.

Iow, under JP's bridge, the kid meant, "It's ok to be the 'white' people who don't oppress non-white people, but I'm not saying anything about the 'white' people who do oppress non-white people in this sign, even though we ALL know--as 'white' people--that everyone in the world except for trolls under bridges will think we're talking about the bad 'white' people."

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

That he's "a racist, segregationist asshole with fascist tendencies" as Koy insists? No. It really isn't.

It is more consistent with the meager evidence we have than your evidence-free defense.

No evidence is needed to defend against slanderous over the top attacks with no evidence. The best evidence you've got suggests he doesn't personally want to boink women who have had sex with black men. That may make him mildly racist. But somehow that convinces Koy that he's fascist and wants to impost segregation on others and that anything he posts, even if its as innocuous as "Its ok to be white" must be a racist attack. This reminds me of the guy who said "Hello" to some lady and she attacked him as misogynist because we all know what hello must really mean... blah blah blah.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

[
And even if we had no other evidence and took JP's bullshit "benign" argument at all seriously, it is an inherently bigoted statement as it (a) establishes a particular grouping of people (called "white" people), (b) separates them from any other group, including other "white" people that are not defined

What now? Separates them from other white people, by calling them white? What? Explain this.

(c) intimates that they are justified in being persecuted (even though, again, it's the other "white" people that are actually guilty)

Um, that's you, not me. It was you who was going on about how "White people" are holding down "black people" (something about putting boots on their necks) and it was you who was making excuses for a black assailant against an innocent white man, because of something other white people did to that black man.

(e) assumes the authority to forgive the actions that led to their persecution, because "they" aren't the "white people" that others are really persecuting.

Saying "its ok to be white" doesn't do that either. What are you on about? Who is "forgiving" anyone for anything?

Iow, under JP's bridge, the kid meant, "It's ok to be the 'white' people who don't oppress non-white people, but I'm not saying anything about the 'white' people who do oppress non-white people in this sign, even though we ALL know--as 'white' people--that everyone in the world except for trolls under bridges will think we're talking about the bad 'white' people."

Um no. But that's some more REALLY creative mind reading you're doing, and now projecting. What "Its ok to be white" means on the face of it is that ... wait for it... its ok to be white. No shame in it.

 

[Koyaanisqatsi]

Somehow that convinces Koy that he's fascist

No, that he's a racist, segregationist asshole with fascist tendencies. When sea lioning, you need to be more attentive to details or everyone will just dismiss you as a transparent virtue signalling troll.

 

[Koyaanisqatsi]

Separates them from other white people, by calling them white? What? Explain this.

Fuck off.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

Somehow that convinces Koy that he's fascist

No, that he's a racist, segregationist asshole with fascist tendencies. When sea lioning, you need to be more attentive to details or everyone will just dismiss you as a transparent virtue signalling troll.

Oh I see. He only has fascist tendencies, which you base on absolutely nothing.

 

[Koyaanisqatsi]

Somehow that convinces Koy that he's fascist

No, that he's a racist, segregationist asshole with fascist tendencies. When sea lioning, you need to be more attentive to details or everyone will just dismiss you as a transparent virtue signalling troll.

Oh I see. He only has fascist tendencies, which you base on absolutely nothing.

No, I'm a mind reader, remember?

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

Separates them from other white people, by calling them white? What? Explain this.

Fuck off.

You don't even know what you are talking about, do you?

No, I'm a mind reader, remember?

You sure do often claim to know what others think and believe. Maybe the psuedoscience subsection is more up your alley.

 

[Toni]

Given this student apparently wanted a girl friend who had not been with a black guy, it is a reasonable deduction. On the otherhand, you have absolutely no evidence to support your claim that this his "Its ok to be white" is some innocent statement.

I would consider categorically not dating a certain race pretty good evidence of racism, to the point where it's hard to give someone the benefit of the doubt. And if a person refuses to date someone who has dated someone of another race, then that is almost certainly racism. Pretty much, there is no other rational explanation.

I wouldn't. Some people just don't get it up, and yeah, a lot of that is based on looks. I don't get it up from women, and that doesn't mean I'm a misogynist. A lot of people don't have the stirrings for people with dicks, and that doesn't make them misandrists.

We don't choose who to be horny for, who to be flaccid for.

But such secondary (tertiary?) traits as "has dated black people"? That's pretty fucking racist.

Well at least he wasn’t insisting that anyone he dated be a virgin. I guess that’s something.


I mean , he was willing to date someone who was slightly used. Just not so dirty as having been with someone who is black.

And/or: he was afraid of suffering by comparison as everybody knows that black men have huge penises and are extremely athletic and oversexed. So maybe it was a kind of compliment to black men.....



And yeah—that’s all irony, boys.

 

[Koyaanisqatsi]

You don't even know what you are talking about, do you?

Your mom?

No, I'm a mind reader, remember?

You sure do often claim to know what others think and believe.

Only when it comes to transparent shitheads. They're easy to read, because they're full of shit and transparent.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

Your mom?

First racism. Now misogyny?

Only when it comes to transparent shitheads.

Finally some self reflection. Good on you.