• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

You are not baptized - aka superstition run amok

The Creator of the Universe is such a Stickler for Detail, one Word out of place and you are Toast....
Yes, it sounds like a movie where am all powerful ruler chops off a head for making a gamataical mistake.

Or a typo?
🤩
I have diabetic nephropathy. Reading for me even with magnification is difficult. Glasses do mot help. I don't always pick up typos and the spell checker underlines.

Thanks for 'splaining that, Steve. I have long wondered... at first I thought you simply had no regard for your readers.
I'll stop complaining about your typos now... :)
My readers? HeeHeeHeee...
 
God, how I despise supernatural pettiness. The RCC leadership and I have been on the outs for several years, but this kind of bullshit helps maintain that status quo, Francis or no. Hell, it wakes up the dormant cradle Lutheran within me. I don't even worship with the Lutherans anymore, but this sort of nonsense takes me right back to confirmation class and that quiet revolutionary fire they keep carefully tucked away behind the nervous smiles and the lutefisk. Who the hell do these bishops think they are, to tell us what form of baptism God does or does not accept? They do not create the baptism, they only administer it, and even proper Roman Catholic doctrine has always been that any sacrament performed in extremis is valid. Remember when they used to use this as an excuse to kidnap Jewish babies who had supposedly been baptized by their nursemaids? How is that okay but a priest accidentally using the wrong formula is not?

It also doesn't make sense that they are "generously" offering to correct the error. This error, if it is a true error, cannot be corrected. Some of those affected will surely have died before the "fix" could be offered, and of those who haven't, many of them may well have taken Communion by now, which is considered a mortal sin if you aren't baptized for the same bullshit reasons as the above. When I was enrolled at a parochial school briefly in my teenage years, I was assured most solemnly upon enrolling that I would burn in hell if I tried to take the Eucharist along with my Catholic fellow-students at Wednesday mass, as my own baptism had been performed outside of the RCC. I was "allowed" (again with the faux generosity) to go forward and receive a blessing at Communion time, as long as I kept my arms folded over my chest to mark myself as a unwashed heretic.
Why are you invoking god?
In an ecclesiastical dispute? That seems obvious. You're free to be "offended" if you like, but feigining confusion seems silly. Their offense cites Christian doctrine, ergo so does my renunciation thereof.
 
It's about power, control and money, the holy trinity of religion. This has to be the world's oldest profession. I don't think women had enough power and influence back whenever to be able to claim that title.

But maybe priestesses are the perfect marriage of the world's two oldest professions. The men who own and operate the RCC know what they have and aren't going to submit without a fight.
 
God, how I despise supernatural pettiness. The RCC leadership and I have been on the outs for several years, but this kind of bullshit helps maintain that status quo, Francis or no. Hell, it wakes up the dormant cradle Lutheran within me. I don't even worship with the Lutherans anymore, but this sort of nonsense takes me right back to confirmation class and that quiet revolutionary fire they keep carefully tucked away behind the nervous smiles and the lutefisk. Who the hell do these bishops think they are, to tell us what form of baptism God does or does not accept? They do not create the baptism, they only administer it, and even proper Roman Catholic doctrine has always been that any sacrament performed in extremis is valid. Remember when they used to use this as an excuse to kidnap Jewish babies who had supposedly been baptized by their nursemaids? How is that okay but a priest accidentally using the wrong formula is not?

It also doesn't make sense that they are "generously" offering to correct the error. This error, if it is a true error, cannot be corrected. Some of those affected will surely have died before the "fix" could be offered, and of those who haven't, many of them may well have taken Communion by now, which is considered a mortal sin if you aren't baptized for the same bullshit reasons as the above. When I was enrolled at a parochial school briefly in my teenage years, I was assured most solemnly upon enrolling that I would burn in hell if I tried to take the Eucharist along with my Catholic fellow-students at Wednesday mass, as my own baptism had been performed outside of the RCC. I was "allowed" (again with the faux generosity) to go forward and receive a blessing at Communion time, as long as I kept my arms folded over my chest to mark myself as a unwashed heretic.
Why are you invoking god?
In an ecclesiastical dispute? That seems obvious. You're free to be "offended" if you like, but feigining confusion seems silly. Their offense cites Christian doctrine, ergo so does my renunciation thereof.
Believe me when I say you are not likely to ever offend me. Certainly not by an anonymous person on the net.

I forgot you idemtify as a Pagan Christian so I assume the supernatural may be part of your beliefs.

Culturally god metaphors at least used to be common.

It is in god's hands.
God only knows.
God forgives you, I don't.

As an atheist I wold not generally use them in public, it would be disingenuous.
 
It must be more than strategic. If they wanted to be strategic about it, they could tell him to start saying "I" (speaking for Jesus) and let it go at that. Instead they stirred up a lot of shit which will do nothing to consolidate their priestly power. Seems to me they must really believe this mistake has made their spell ineffective, else why do anything more than just tell the priest to start casting the spell with the correct pronoun?
It's a spell...Just like the "ego te absolvo", in Latin, after the confession, which means "I absolve you", not WE absolve you...
 
Yuk it up, but some of us actually appreciate your thoughts.
 
Back
Top Bottom