Merged Greenland is part of NATO via Denmark

[Elixir]

 

[barbos]

US must be well informed about EU critters phone conversations among themselves. So EU will not go against US.
Some people in Deep State are behind all of this, not just the Orange.
But I wish Denmark does all of that.

 

[zorq]

US must be well informed about EU critters phone conversations among themselves. So EU will not go against US.
Some people in Deep State are behind all of this, not just the Orange.
But I wish Denmark does all of that.

One need not eaves drop on telephone conversations to understand treaties and the text of alliance agreements. If Trump attacks Greenland then Nato's Article 5 kicks in.

Of course I wouldn't expect YOU to understand the concept of a country being expected to uphold their signed written agreements.

 

[Learner]

I think Canada should be annexed, after all they all speak american. "English" is close to "american"
so Great Britain is next.
Then some in Canada speak french so France should be annexed. Spanish is used in US so Spain belongs to US. Amish speak german, so........

US has all these connections to Europe, so you all belongs to US. And you all were captured by US in WW2.

Julius Caesar was killed and had at least 60 Roman senators involved, led by Marcus Junius Brutus, Gaius Cassius Longinus, and Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus, stabbing Caesar 23 times. As the human psyche goes throughout history: I wouldn't be surprised your current leader, in a manner of speaking,,"gets stabbed in the back" by his own, when allegiances suddenly change because a deep nagging thought of the future may not turn out so good for them in the end. Noting also the disappointment within the movement... MAGA dividing... many separating themselves from Trump.

The "EU critters" will have many allies within the US.

 

[DrZoidberg]

US must be well informed about EU critters phone conversations among themselves. So EU will not go against US.
Some people in Deep State are behind all of this, not just the Orange.
But I wish Denmark does all of that.

One need not eaves drop on telephone conversations to understand treaties and the text of alliance agreements. If Trump attacks Greenland then Nato's Article 5 kicks in.

Of course I wouldn't expect YOU to understand the concept of a country being expected to uphold their signed written agreements.

I think Trump is testing whether or not NATO has any resolve. It's clear that Trump has no respect for the EU or NATO. And there's nothing the European navies have that can stop USA. Trump knows it and Denmark knows it. If there's a fight it'll be the kind of fight Putin hoped Russia would have in Ukraine, but didn't. The biggest price will be that USA will be a pariah state and joins the Axis of Evil countries. But Trump may not care about that.

If there's a land war on European soil the European countries will most likely win against USA. But in the arctic... nope. Not a chance.

 

[Elixir]

This is the reason El Pedo wants to attack a NATO Country.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

US must be well informed about EU critters phone conversations among themselves. So EU will not go against US.
Some people in Deep State are behind all of this, not just the Orange.
But I wish Denmark does all of that.

One need not eaves drop on telephone conversations to understand treaties and the text of alliance agreements. If Trump attacks Greenland then Nato's Article 5 kicks in.

Of course I wouldn't expect YOU to understand the concept of a country being expected to uphold their signed written agreements.

I think Trump is testing whether or not NATO has any resolve. It's clear that Trump has no respect for the EU or NATO. And there's nothing the European navies have that can stop USA. Trump knows it and Denmark knows it. If there's a fight it'll be the kind of fight Putin hoped Russia would have in Ukraine, but didn't. The biggest price will be that USA will be a pariah state and joins the Axis of Evil countries. But Trump may not care about that.

If there's a land war on European soil the European countries will most likely win against USA. But in the arctic... nope. Not a chance.

Land war in Europe? The US military isn't set up for a land war in Europe. It'd take a while to even mobilize the fight. And last time we did, the coastal areas were on the same side.

The US easily can take Greenland. But I imagine it'll be a scorched Earth maneuver. It'd be costly, deploying troops to occupy a small area isn't cheap, even if there is no violence. Losing health care will make the locals angry, something would happen. And in Congress, there would be a need to authorize spending for the occupation. That won't happen in the Senate. It'll be filibustered to the ground.

Trade relations will evaporate, Europe will turn to China. It'll isolate the US, which is exactly what Russia would love. Of course, if Europe turns to China, that isn't exactly in Russia's favor either, but unlike China, Russia doesn't have much of a forward focus. It is the only nation that looks to the future in the past.

Finally, just because the US military takes Greenland doesn't mean the US has Greenland. International law would get really weird if the part of the Government doesn't recognize the US owns Greenland.

 

[Toni]

I think it’s cute someone believes Trump secretly wants to help the Inuit people of Greenland.

No. It’s not cute at all. It’s not even delusional. It’s just as completely wrong headed as it is possible to be, without the excusable level of delusion required.

 

[Toni]

US must be well informed about EU critters phone conversations among themselves. So EU will not go against US.
Some people in Deep State are behind all of this, not just the Orange.
But I wish Denmark does all of that.

One need not eaves drop on telephone conversations to understand treaties and the text of alliance agreements. If Trump attacks Greenland then Nato's Article 5 kicks in.

Of course I wouldn't expect YOU to understand the concept of a country being expected to uphold their signed written agreements.

I think Trump is testing whether or not NATO has any resolve. It's clear that Trump has no respect for the EU or NATO. And there's nothing the European navies have that can stop USA. Trump knows it and Denmark knows it. If there's a fight it'll be the kind of fight Putin hoped Russia would have in Ukraine, but didn't. The biggest price will be that USA will be a pariah state and joins the Axis of Evil countries. But Trump may not care about that.

If there's a land war on European soil the European countries will most likely win against USA. But in the arctic... nope. Not a chance.

Land war in Europe? The US military isn't set up for a land war in Europe. It'd take a while to even mobilize the fight. And last time we did, the coastal areas were on the same side.

The US easily can take Greenland. But I imagine it'll be a scorched Earth maneuver. It'd be costly, deploying troops to occupy a small area isn't cheap, even if there is no violence. Losing health care will make the locals angry, something would happen. And in Congress, there would be a need to authorize spending for the occupation. That won't happen in the Senate. It'll be filibustered to the ground.

Trade relations will evaporate, Europe will turn to China. It'll isolate the US, which is exactly what Russia would love. Of course, if Europe turns to China, that isn't exactly in Russia's favor either, but unlike China, Russia doesn't have much of a forward focus. It is the only nation that looks to the future in the past.

Finally, just because the US military takes Greenland doesn't mean the US has Greenland. International law would get really weird if the part of the Government doesn't recognize the US owns Greenland.

If Trump decided to ‘take’ Greenland, it would be the start of WW III.

 

[Elixir]

We (NATO) should send our best operatives to neutralize the orange scourge that is threatening to attack us.

 

[WAB]

Four nations sending military personnel to Greenland:

MSN

 

[crazyfingers]

Will the idiot scumbag step back from starting a war with NATO? I'm not sure he will.

 

[Elixir]

Will the idiot scumbag step back from starting a war with NATO? I'm not sure he will.

WHY SHOULD HE?
If anything in America returns to “normal” he goes to jail and/ or is put to death.
Attacking a NATO country, obligating the rest of NATO to fight against us and putting us on the side of Putin (a fellow perv), invoking the insurrection act and canceling the midterms, is OBVIOUSLY the way to stay out of jail.
He will make however big a shitstorm it takes, for people to say “Jeffrey WHO?” and forget about elections and incarcerating the fraudster, because there will be more urgent emergency conditions that he is currently fabricating.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Land war in Europe? The US military isn't set up for a land war in Europe. It'd take a while to even mobilize the fight. And last time we did, the coastal areas were on the same side.

The US easily can take Greenland. But I imagine it'll be a scorched Earth maneuver. It'd be costly, deploying troops to occupy a small area isn't cheap, even if there is no violence. Losing health care will make the locals angry, something would happen. And in Congress, there would be a need to authorize spending for the occupation. That won't happen in the Senate. It'll be filibustered to the ground.

Trade relations will evaporate, Europe will turn to China. It'll isolate the US, which is exactly what Russia would love. Of course, if Europe turns to China, that isn't exactly in Russia's favor either, but unlike China, Russia doesn't have much of a forward focus. It is the only nation that looks to the future in the past.

Finally, just because the US military takes Greenland doesn't mean the US has Greenland. International law would get really weird if the part of the Government doesn't recognize the US owns Greenland.

If Trump decided to ‘take’ Greenland, it would be the start of WW III.

Maybe down the road. But I can't see Europe going to war over Greenland. It would effectively end NATO and put the UN at risk as well. The cost of taking Greenland would far supercede any "benefits" of doing so.

I think the better thing to consider is whether the US military would actually follow such orders, as invading Greenland would be against treaty law. I'm uncertain if that would be considered an "illegal order".

 

[lostone]

Will the idiot scumbag step back from starting a war with NATO? I'm not sure he will.

WHY SHOULD HE?
If anything in America returns to “normal” he goes to jail and/ or is put to death.
Attacking a NATO country, obligating the rest of NATO to fight against us and putting us on the side of Putin (a fellow perv), invoking the insurrection act and canceling the midterms, is OBVIOUSLY the way to stay out of jail.
He will make however big a shitstorm it takes, for people to say “Jeffrey WHO?” and forget about elections and incarcerating the fraudster, because there will be more urgent emergency conditions that he is currently fabricating.

A real insurrection, or a low level civil war, both possible, given his incitement, both that he is sure to win, would save his sorry ass for the rest of his life.

 

[Shadowy Man]

I think the better thing to consider is whether the US military would actually follow such orders, as invading Greenland would be against treaty law. I'm uncertain if that would be considered an "illegal order".

They have already demonstrated a willingness to obey illegal orders so I don’t see why they wouldn’t here. I’m sure there will be an internal justification as to why this would be legal.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I think the better thing to consider is whether the US military would actually follow such orders, as invading Greenland would be against treaty law. I'm uncertain if that would be considered an "illegal order".

They have already demonstrated a willingness to obey illegal orders so I don’t see why they wouldn’t here. I’m sure there will be an internal justification as to why this would be legal.

Firing on a "drug boat" is not invading NATO territory.

 

[crazyfingers]

The evil mother fucker is bent on destroying our relations with Europe and destroying NATO - exactly what Putin wants.

The mother fucker will isolate the US on the world state except for putting the in league with the worst tyrants.

Meanwhile, CNN is reporting on a new poll.

​

75% of Americans oppose US attempting to take control of Greenland, CNN poll finds​

Three-quarters of Americans say they oppose the United States attempting to take control of Greenland, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS, indicating that President Donald Trump’s push to expand America’s territory faces stiff headwinds with the public.


The survey finds just 25% of Americans favor the US attempting to take control of the Danish territory. Even the president’s partisans are about evenly divided, with 50% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents saying they support it and 50% opposed. Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents are deeply against the move, with 94% opposed overall, including 80% who say they strongly oppose it. About 8 in 10 independents who don’t lean toward either party are also opposed.

What will it take to get Congress to act and stop his madness?

 

[crazyfingers]

The URL https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/15/politics/greenland-cnn-poll

 

[Tigers!]

The evil mother fucker is bent on destroying our relations with Europe and destroying NATO - exactly what Putin wants.

The mother fucker will isolate the US on the world state except for putting the in league with the worst tyrants.

Meanwhile, CNN is reporting on a new poll.

​

75% of Americans oppose US attempting to take control of Greenland, CNN poll finds​

Three-quarters of Americans say they oppose the United States attempting to take control of Greenland, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS, indicating that President Donald Trump’s push to expand America’s territory faces stiff headwinds with the public.


The survey finds just 25% of Americans favor the US attempting to take control of the Danish territory. Even the president’s partisans are about evenly divided, with 50% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents saying they support it and 50% opposed. Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents are deeply against the move, with 94% opposed overall, including 80% who say they strongly oppose it. About 8 in 10 independents who don’t lean toward either party are also opposed.

What will it take to get Congress to act and stop his madness?

Only 75% opposed!