• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Another Fucking Mass Shooting At US School

I get Derec's ironic point. After all, it is people like Derec and the NRA because they support maniacal SCOTUS decisions that expand 2nd amendment rights which make easy to legally obtain a fire arms and fight against reasonable Constitutional restrictions.
I have been consistent in supporting common sense restrictions on gun ownership.

What I disagree with are those who want to (effectively) ban private gun ownership, and/or those who want to make it illegal to use firearms for self-defense, including in your home.
 
I need to know my username and password (typical). And then I need to own a cell phone, have it on me, to receive a text message code to get into my account.

You can just get a weapon on the street. It isn't legal, but so isn't murder.
It's easier to get drugs than pay a utility bill. It's easier to get laid than pay a utility bill.
 
One thing is certain: that firearm, no matter how many hands it passed through, ultimately traces back to a legal point of origin.
Most of the time. But with ghost guns and the like, that is not true.
Edit: Let’s stop pussyfooting around this. As long as firearms are being manufactured and remain legal, there’s no realistic way to keep them entirely out of criminal hands. If you’re comfortable with them being legal, then you’re also accepting the reality that some will end up in the wrong hands. The two go hand in hand.
It's not all or nothing. We can reduce the danger of illegal guns without banning them for law-abiding citizens. Could the Shreveport shooting have been prevented, and how? We would need to know more details, including how he got the gun(s). Hence my non-rhetorical question.

Mass/school shootings happen even in countries with very strict gun laws. You can never eliminate the residual risk.

At Least 9 Dead in Second School Shooting in Turkey in Two Days
 
As though this hasn't been responded to ad nauseum.
Indeed, but my reply was in direct response to Gospel.
Specifically, this:
As long as firearms are being manufactured and remain legal, there’s no realistic way to keep them entirely out of criminal hands. If you’re comfortable with them being legal, then you’re also accepting the reality that some will end up in the wrong hands. The two go hand in hand.
Even where guns are mostly illegal for private use, some firearms end up in the wrong hands.
 
I get Derec's ironic point. After all, it is people like Derec and the NRA because they support maniacal SCOTUS decisions that expand 2nd amendment rights which make easy to legally obtain a fire arms and fight against reasonable Constitutional restrictions.
I have been consistent in supporting common sense restrictions on gun ownership.
So you support banning the private ownership of automatic or semi-automatic weapons?
 
I get Derec's ironic point. After all, it is people like Derec and the NRA because they support maniacal SCOTUS decisions that expand 2nd amendment rights which make easy to legally obtain a fire arms and fight against reasonable Constitutional restrictions.
I have been consistent in supporting common sense restrictions on gun ownership.
So you support banning the private ownership of automatic or semi-automatic weapons?
And the carrying handguns in public.
 
One thing is certain: that firearm, no matter how many hands it passed through, ultimately traces back to a legal point of origin.


Mass/school shootings happen even in countries with very strict gun laws. You can never eliminate the residual risk.

At Least 9 Dead in Second School Shooting in Turkey in Two Days
Since 2000 there have been 642 school shootings in USA. 24.7 shootings/pa. One every 2 weeks.
Since 1978 there have been 60 school shootings in Türkiye. 1.27 shootings/pa. One every year.

Türkiye has a problem. USA has a cataclysm.

As noted you can never eliminate the residual risk but the USA doesn't even appear to be trying.
 
Back
Top Bottom