So another "chemical" attack in Syria?

[blastula]

I was talking about the indicter links. I need to correct one thing, after further reading over there, that site is run by de Noli, who is the same guy who runs the doctors group, so it is a direct report. However, he turns out to be another ct nut and with a particular obsession with Assange.

I'm done clicking on your links.

 

[fromderinside]

So all this after Turkey confirmed autopsies concluded gas was used?

 

[tupac chopra]

PIPELINE

Bringing real muscle to bear against Syria. 13 September 1983 CIA document.

 

[barbos]

So all this after Turkey confirmed autopsies concluded gas was used?

Link?
And Turkey are not exactly unbiased.

 

[Will Wiley]

So all this after Turkey confirmed autopsies concluded gas was used?

Link?
And Turkey are not exactly unbiased.

Turkish autopsy results show chemical weapons were used in Syria attack

They don't appear to name the chemical. So I'd guess it was maybe chlorine, but that they want to keep it vague in order to not contradict Trump who claimed it was a nerve agent IIRC.

Postmortems carried out on the bodies of people who died in a suspected gas attack in Syria show the victims were exposed to chemical weapons, Turkey’s justice minister has said.

I'm curious as to how a post mortem can conclude that the chemicals were from weapons rather than from chemicals that were stored and bombed.

 

[barbos]

Link?
And Turkey are not exactly unbiased.

Turkish autopsy results show chemical weapons were used in Syria attack

They don't appear to name the chemical. So I'd guess it was maybe chlorine, but that they want to keep it vague in order to not contradict Trump who claimed it was a nerve agent IIRC.

Postmortems carried out on the bodies of people who died in a suspected gas attack in Syria show the victims were exposed to chemical weapons, Turkey’s justice minister has said.

I'm curious as to how a post mortem can conclude that the chemicals were from weapons rather than from chemicals that were stored and bombed.

So Turkish conducted no tests. I am not surprised.

 

[ZiprHead]

Turkish autopsy results show chemical weapons were used in Syria attack

They don't appear to name the chemical. So I'd guess it was maybe chlorine, but that they want to keep it vague in order to not contradict Trump who claimed it was a nerve agent IIRC.

Postmortems carried out on the bodies of people who died in a suspected gas attack in Syria show the victims were exposed to chemical weapons, Turkey’s justice minister has said.

I'm curious as to how a post mortem can conclude that the chemicals were from weapons rather than from chemicals that were stored and bombed.

So Turkish conducted no tests. I am not surprised.

Dude, that's not what it said. Try harder.

 

[laughing dog]

Yup, linking to a well-known russian propaganda organ with an article in Russian is certainly convincing evidence.

A well known bullshit poster with his post in english (!!!) is certainly debunking Swedish doctor human rights organization.

Coming from one of the most massive propagandists on this board, that is hilarious.

The Swedish NGO Doctors for Human Rights (SWEDHR) has accused the Syria Civil Defense, better known as the White Helmets, of falsifying information about its alleged work in Syria. According to the Swedish human rights activists, so-called "rescue" procedures captured in White Helmets videos had been staged; they were carried out on a dead child.

Thank you for providing an English translation.

Interestingly, that snippet actually works against the morally depraved arguments from the dupes and asswipes of Russian propagandist that support Assad and his atrocities.

 

[barbos]

Turkish autopsy results show chemical weapons were used in Syria attack

They don't appear to name the chemical. So I'd guess it was maybe chlorine, but that they want to keep it vague in order to not contradict Trump who claimed it was a nerve agent IIRC.

Postmortems carried out on the bodies of people who died in a suspected gas attack in Syria show the victims were exposed to chemical weapons, Turkey’s justice minister has said.

I'm curious as to how a post mortem can conclude that the chemicals were from weapons rather than from chemicals that were stored and bombed.

So Turkish conducted no tests. I am not surprised.

Dude, that's not what it said. Try harder.

If they can't say what it was then their "tests" are worthless. Even G7 seems to agree that investigation is needed. I have a feeling that it could turn into massive embarrassment for US/British and Canadian.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

If they cant say what it was then their "tests" are worthless.

*rolling eyes*

And if their tests concluded a specific weaponized gas, you'd say the Turks couldn't be trusted. So please stop pretending there is some tangible threshold of evidence that would make you change your mind.

 

[barbos]

If they cant say what it was then their "tests" are worthless.

*rolling eyes*

And if their tests concluded a specific weaponized gas, you'd say the Turks couldn't be trusted.

I certainly would, in fact I already did. But the fact is, there were no tests.

 

[Elixir]

*rolling eyes*

And if their tests concluded a specific weaponized gas, you'd say the Turks couldn't be trusted.

I certainly would, in fact I already did. But the fact is, there were no tests.

Barbie will say ANYTHING to try to excuse the Russian position.
Like a stopped clock, Trump happens to be right this time; Russia is either complicit or incompetent.

 

[barbos]

I certainly would, in fact I already did. But the fact is, there were no tests.

Barbie will say ANYTHING to try to excuse the Russian position.
Like a stopped clock, Trump happens to be right this time; Russia is either complicit or incompetent.

Who is Barbie? No, Trump is both wrong and incompetent regardless, he launched an attack without any investigation and/or confirmation. Bush Jr. at least manufactured the evidence before invading Iraq.
In this case Ivanka Trump watched TV, got upset and convinced Daddy to bomb these bad people TV said were bad.

 

[Elixir]

Barbie will say ANYTHING to try to excuse the Russian position.
Like a stopped clock, Trump happens to be right this time; Russia is either complicit or incompetent.

Trump is both wrong and incompetent regardless.

Nobody here (except maybe WP) is going to argue that Trump is anything like competent. But you are silly as an infant, trying to pretend that your hero Putin is anything but a lying murderer working with Assad to commit genocide.

 

[LordKiran]

Trump is both wrong and incompetent regardless.

Nobody here (except maybe WP) is going to argue that Trump is anything like competent. But you are silly as an infant, trying to pretend that your hero Putin is anything but a lying murderer working with Assad to commit genocide.

I think you'd agree that's a gross oversimplification of the facts.

At the risk of evoking trump, by this logic Putin is no more a genocidal madman than any of our presidents in the last 60-80 years.

 

[barbos]

Trump is both wrong and incompetent regardless.

Nobody here (except maybe WP) is gaoing to argue that Trump is anything like competent. But you are silly as an infant, trying to pretend that your hero Putin is anything but a lying murderer working with Assad to commit genocide.

First, he is not my hero. Second I realize that you truly believe that, but does it occur to you that you could be totally wrong about Putin?
What if you are wrong and Putin and Assad are not responsible? Do you not understand that if you are wrong then we are all fucked?
All russians are suggesting it to have investigation and trust me, Putin does not have unconditional love for Assad.

 

[Elixir]

Nobody here (except maybe WP) is going to argue that Trump is anything like competent. But you are silly as an infant, trying to pretend that your hero Putin is anything but a lying murderer working with Assad to commit genocide.

I think you'd agree that's a gross oversimplification of the facts.

At the risk of evoking trump, by this logic Putin is no more a genocidal madman than any of our presidents in the last 60-80 years.

There is a difference other than degrees. Our recent historical complicity is a result from tensions between a Democrat President and a Republican Congress whose stated mission was to keep the President from doing anything. Ever. Even if it was what they wanted. Putin's complicity has been continuously and autocratically dictated.

and trust me

Not likely. You're channeling El Cheato now?

 

[barbos]

and trust me

Not likely. You're channeling El Cheato now?

No, I am channeling Colin Powell in his Saddam&WMD presentation.

 

[KeepTalking]

Who is Barbie?

No one of consequence.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Not likely. You're channeling El Cheato now?

No, I am channeling Colin Powell in his Saddam&WMD presentation.

MSF says it is strongly likely two different weapons were used. They weren't exactly defending the call to war in '03.