Emily Lake
Might be a replicant
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2014
- Messages
- 8,983
- Location
- It's a desert out there
- Gender
- Agenderist
- Basic Beliefs
- Atheist
Your entire argument rests upon your childhood experience of *someone else* meaning mexicans when they used the term illegal aliens. Therefore, because you have an association with what *someone else* meant, you cannot conceive that other people don't mean that. You have a bias in your own mind that associated the term illegal alien with mexicans, and now *you* automatically assume that the term always means something racist.Wow. Ignorant and not at all accurate.I didn't have a dumb interpretation - I picked up EXACTLY what Toni was laying down.No one said or even hinted at that.Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haI knew exactly what my father meant when he used the n word. Without it being explained to me.
He saw nothing wrong with his word choice, either.
Using a legal term for a non-citizen who is in the country without authorization is just as bad as the n-word now?
Are you well? Are you sober? I ask, because that is a very dumb interpretation which is rare from you in my experience.
Yeparooni. Legal terms with absolutely no reference to race or ethnicity are pretty much just as bad as racial slurs. All because Toni can't keep herself from thinking "mexicans" when she hears the term illegal alien.No, she got it. Kinda. It might not be technically as bad as the n word but that don’t make it good or ok.
You may be projecting but I ain’t receiving
It's a defined legal term that means a person who is not a citizen or national of the United States and is present without authorization. That's what it means.
There's been a lot of effort put into intentionally softening terms over the last couple of decades. It might have begun as some well-meaning effort to recognize the humanity of other people, but the reality is that the people being discussed are rarely offended by the terms. It's not homeless people getting bent out of shape about being referred to as homeless rather than "persons without housing" or whatever - it's guilt-ridden middle class people who feel obliged to be offended on their behalf and to insist that everyone else contort our language to avoid offending the guilt-ridden middle class person's feelings about homeless folks. It's not disabled people running point on demanding they be referred to as "differently abled" or "handicapable". It's not hispanics who insist on being referred to as "latinx".
Some of those advocated changes are relatively harmless, but some of them have the effect of obfuscating what's actually being talked about or making it less understandable. This is one of those situations. It seems very nice and compassionate to say "undocumented migrants", but it has the overall effect of masking what's being discussed. It makes it sound as if we're talking about people who are merely passing through on their nomadic route, and just don't happen to have their paperwork with them. Like driving across town and having forgotten to grab your wallet, so you don't have your license with you. But that's not the reality - the reality is that we're talking about non-citizens who have entered the US illegally, and who should not be here. You can feel sympathy for someone looking for a better life - by all means, that's a noble sentiment! But looking for a better life doesn't give anyone the right to violate immigration law and be excused from the consequences of that crime.