• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

What TV are you watching and how would you rate it? [Revive from FRDB]

Been watching Barney Miller, which began in 1975. Amazingly, Abe Vigoda was only 54 at the time, but he plays a crotchety old fart with numerous maladies who's constantly running to the bathroom and fears intimacy with his wife. He was 54, playing a 62 year old - but could have passed for 70 easily!
 
Last edited:
I'm watching Star Trek DS9 start to finish for the second time this and last month. I've decided when it's done I'll rewatch Star Trek TNG. I haven't watched that from start to finish in maybe 15 years.
 
I watch the same thing over and over.

The Waltons
The Harry Potter 8 movies
Star Trek DS9, TNG, VOY, ENT and TOS
Stargate SG1
Stagate Atlantis
Roots TV Movies
World at War 26 episode Documentary on WWII
The 9 Star Wars


A while ago a got the DVDs for MASH and All In The Family. Haven't watching them though yet

I generally don't watch one-off movies. Sometimes. But usually I like to watch the same characters for a while. Or it could be that I don't like to make a decision and would prefer to just take the disc out and put in the next in a series.

I don't stream. I prefer to flip discs. Streaming means looking for it and risking that it won't be free anymore. I don't pay for things unless I can own them and that means physical discs.
 
Mandalorian Season One - It isn't bad... but it isn't that good. It is The Incredible Hulk (TV show) in space mixed in a blender with 1950s superhero serials. It is far from compelling.
 
Mandalorian Season One - It isn't bad... but it isn't that good. It is The Incredible Hulk (TV show) in space mixed in a blender with 1950s superhero serials. It is far from compelling.
Remarkably though it’s one of the very best Star Wars offerings by Disney. That and Andor; the rest are hot garbage.
 
Mandalorian Season One - It isn't bad... but it isn't that good. It is The Incredible Hulk (TV show) in space mixed in a blender with 1950s superhero serials. It is far from compelling.
Remarkably though it’s one of the very best Star Wars offerings by Disney. That and Andor; the rest are hot garbage.
Well, that is unfortunate. Not surprising, but unfortunate. I'm struggling with wanting to watch Mandalorian any more than I have. Andor had continuity issues, but it had characters and plots that, while a bit convoluted at points, helped develop a story arc for the film that felt entirely without a soul despite being an otherwise decent film. Mandalorian is just tropes, cliches, and overly simple writing with no growth. If Andor is DS9, Mandalorian is Voyager.
 
I liked Andor. The first season anyway. I haven't picked up the second season yet.
 
I'm watching Star Trek TNG through for the first time in many years. But I am skipping a few episodes along the way. Still on season 1. It gets better. I know. I've watched them over and over. :)
 
Something new I started watching this week and will probably get hooked on because most anything about dogs is addictive to me. Sadly there was only one season.

https://www.paramountplus.com/shows/dogs-with-extraordinary-jobs/

Dogs With Extraordinary Jobs
Dogs. They aren't simply man's best friend. They are rescuers, protectors, partners, and even detectives, often putting their lives on the line to make our world a safer, better place. Join us we span the globe to meet extraordinary dogs with extraordinary jobs, doing everything from saving lives to helping us conquer our greatest fears. We detail how these dogs' natural abilities -- from their powerful sense of smell to their strength and stamina to their desire to play -- are being harnessed to help people in remarkable ways.
Genre Documentary
Year 2019
Seasons 1
Rating TV-PG
Brand Smithsonian Channel
Episode Guide
 
Netflix has produced a new big budget dinosaur documentary series, with Steve Spielberg producing. I went into it with high hopes, as it LOOKS absolutely gorgeous. But the history and biology presented are... well, it's clear they had paleontologists write the initial scripts, but then film directors took over the task of adapting everything in a way that could be shown visually, and in so doing wrapped in just about every trope imaginable of how the public tends to misunderstand evolution. Often the animal on the screen is described as the "first" or the "last" whatever they are, "trying to adapt", or if they failed to adapt, just sort of wandering sadly about burned forests waiting to go extinct. I realize its supposed to be a poetic metaphor or something, but as it corresponds to a common and popular way of imagining evolution wrong, it really started to bug me by episode three. There's a few other gripes, too; I think they are in such a hurry to cover the while 170 million year time span, they don't always get all the way through explaining things. Like, they make a big deal of the splitting of the ornithischians and saurischians, but then don't really explain what the difference actually is. The effect of this and other similar fast forwards is that I think the documentary probably makes a lot more sense to someone who already knows quite a bit about dinosaurs than it would to someone whose knowledge is minimal or out of date. And of course there's lots of anthropomorphization, as in most nature docos. The writeres seem very confused throughout about what is or isn't a "reptile". Lots of rather speculative or creative etiology.

Still, the animations are lovely, and its nice to see some screen time given to some geological events that aren't often depicted on screen, such as the Carnian-Pluvial episode which was so important in the development of life but often gets ignored in favor of the period-ending extinctions. Great also to see some animals, like Yutyrannus and Rhynchosaurus, that are pretty neat but rarely seen in documentaries. And correct depictions of some of the creatures previous media have gotten wrong, it is especially lovely to see dilophosaurus in her full size and glorious violence - feeling a bit guilty, there, Steven? Overall, I think the series would make for a fantastic ambience video to have on in the background, but if you want to learn some stuff about dinosaurs, it might be best to have Wikipedia spooled up so you can fill in the gaps of what's presented. It's no Prehistoric Planet or Your Inner Fish, but it looks better than either, and despite my gripes, the narration is still better than your average nature documentary.
 
Last edited:
Netflix has produced a new big budget dinosaur documentary series, with Steve Spielberg producing. I went into it with high hopes, as it LOOKS absolutely gorgeous. But the history and biology presented are... well, it's clear they had paleontologists write the initial scripts, but then film directors took over the task of adapting everything in a way that could be shown visually, and in so doing wrapped in just about every trope imaginable of how the public tends to misunderstand evolution. Often the animal on the screen is described as the "first" or the "last" whatever they are, "trying to adapt", or if they failed to adapt, just sort of wandering sadly about burned forests waiting to go extinct. I realize its supposed to be a poetic metaphor or something, but as it corresponds to a common and popular way of imagining evolution wrong, it really started to bug me by episode three. There's a few other gripes, too; I think they are in such a hurry to cover the while 170 million year time span, they don't always get all the way through explaining things. Like, they make a big deal of the splitting of the ornithischians and saurischians, but then don't really explain what the difference actually is. The effect of this and other similar fast forwards is that I think the documentary probably makes a lot more sense to someone who already knows quite a bit about dinosaurs than it would to someone whose knowledge is minimal or out of date. And of course there's lots of anthropomorphization, as in most nature docos. The writeres seem very confused throughout about what is or isn't a "reptile". Lots of rather speculative or creative etiology.

Still, the animations are lovely, and its nice to see some screen time given to some geological events that aren't often depicted on screen, such as the Carnian-Pluvial episode which was so important in the development of life but often gets ignored in favor of the period-ending extinctions. Great also to see some animals, like Yutyrannus and Rhynchosaurus, that are pretty neat but rarely seen in documentaries. And correct depictions of some of the creatures previous media have gotten wrong, it is especially lovely to see dilophosaurus in her full size and glorious violence - feeling a bit guilty, there, Steven? Overall, I think the series would make for a fantastic ambience video to have on in the background, but if you want to learn some stuff about dinosaurs, it might be best to have Wikipedia spooled up so you can fill in the gaps of what's presented. It's no Prehistoric Planet or Your Inner Fish, but it looks better than either, and despite my gripes, the narration is still better than your average nature documentary.
The ROM in Toronto has (had?) an insanely remarkable evolution exhibit.
 
Daredevil Season 2 - I'm enjoying it. Obviously, my one gripe about Daredevil is that he heals way too fast.
I'm watching Star Trek TNG through for the first time in many years. But I am skipping a few episodes along the way. Still on season 1. It gets better. I know. I've watched them over and over. :)
I tried rewatching TNG, but I think I've just watched it too many times. Really liked the show for so long, but at this point, the lack of an underlying season arc makes it less interesting than B5 or DS9.
 
Daredevil Season 2 - I'm enjoying it. Obviously, my one gripe about Daredevil is that he heals way too fast.
I'm watching Star Trek TNG through for the first time in many years. But I am skipping a few episodes along the way. Still on season 1. It gets better. I know. I've watched them over and over. :)
I tried rewatching TNG, but I think I've just watched it too many times. Really liked the show for so long, but at this point, the lack of an underlying season arc makes it less interesting than B5 or DS9.

Ya I like DS9 better but I just watched it through twice. It's been maybe 10-15 years since I've watched TNG through so I'm enjoying it.

Besides, I don't just sit and watch the TV. I'm always doing other stuff. I just have it on and follow along. Like right now.
 
Besides, I don't just sit and watch the TV. I'm always doing other stuff. I just have it on and follow along. Like right now.
The same here. I'm always doing something else, reading this or other boards I am on. Or playing Microsoft Solitaire.
 
https://dogshowtv.com/barking-up-the-right-tree-the-ultimate-guide-to-the-dog-house-tv-show/

I've become so addicted to watching "Dog House" that I sometimes walk around imitating a British accent, since it's a British show. It's so nice to watch people adopt dogs from such a fantastic place as the one in the show. Since dogs are better than people, I give credit to all the people who help provide our best friends find good homes. I'm on Season 3 now.



Welcome to our ultimate guide to the beloved Dog House TV show! If you are a canine enthusiast or simply love heartwarming stories about dogs finding their forever homes, this is the perfect place for you. The Dog House TV show has captured the hearts of viewers worldwide with its touching tales of rescue dogs and the dedicated staff who work tirelessly to match them with loving families. In this blog, we will delve into the behind-the-scenes of the show, explore the heartwarming moments that have left viewers in tears, and provide you with everything you need to know about this heartwarming and inspiring series. Get ready to bark up the right tree with our comprehensive guide!
 
Back
Top Bottom