This claim has nothing to do with determinism.
Of course it does! If we saw instantly, causality would be violated in some frames with people judging from that frame that an effect preceded its cause. All this was explained to you back at FF and duly ignored by you.
It has nothing to do with cause/effect because the past does not cause the present when the present is all that exists. I know I know, you believe in a block universe, so there's no way you would ever accept that there is no such thing as the past or future, only RIGHT NOW.
For heavens sake!! That's not reality. You are talking about some sort of fantasy world.
'Right now' is shaped by all that went before.
No one is saying anything different DBT, but the past does not cause the present when the past is not here? That doesn't mean that right now isn't shaped by what came before. That is what our memories are for: to consolidate our experiences into a meaningful tapestry that makes sense of the world. This change in definition doesn't change the fact that will is not free; it just makes it more accurate in how it's expressed, which clarifies many things.
You say something different, then deny that you said something different.
It's all over the place.
No, you're just not getting it.
Because the claim doesn't relate to the way the world works, anybody who has even a basic understanding of physics can't accept it, or 'get it.'
It's impossible. There is no way for it to work. Physicists, biologists are not not going to scratch their heads in wonder at how they missed instant vision.
