• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

NSFW: The latest tranche of Epstein evidence – in pictures

Don2 (Don1 Revised)

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
14,570
Location
USA
Basic Beliefs
non-practicing agnostic

This isn't safe for work at all. Some of these photos are of toys and other things...

Steve Bannon seems pretty connected to Epstein. Dershowitz was pretty connected too and I wonder if this is how he ended up on Trump's defense team.
 
WHY DON'T LIBRULS EVER MENTION BILL CLINT- oh wait.

THIS IS JUST A POLITICAL HIT JOB ON DONALD TRUM- oh wait.
 
Last edited:
Dershowitz was Epstein's lawyer at one time, so its no surprise he would be in the pictures.

Is there something (or someone) in these photos we didn't know (or suspect) before? And the sex toys are a bit of a yawn. Not my thing, but whatever you stick up your butt or vag (or someone else's with their consent) is not my business.
 
Dershowitz was Epstein's lawyer at one time, so its no surprise he would be in the pictures.

Obviously, but Dershowitz was connected to Trump through Epstein's and other NY elites' parties.

Is there something (or someone) in these photos we didn't know (or suspect) before? And the sex toys are a bit of a yawn. Not my thing, but whatever you stick up your butt or vag (or someone else's with their consent) is not my business.

So you are claiming that Epstein was using the toys, handcuffs, and ball gags on consenting adults.
 
Dershowitz was Epstein's lawyer at one time, so its no surprise he would be in the pictures.

Obviously, but Dershowitz was connected to Trump through Epstein's and other NY elites' parties.

Is there something (or someone) in these photos we didn't know (or suspect) before? And the sex toys are a bit of a yawn. Not my thing, but whatever you stick up your butt or vag (or someone else's with their consent) is not my business.

So you are claiming that Epstein was using the toys, handcuffs, and ball gags on consenting adults.
I mean, he says that, but project 2026 just dropped, and it's targeting gay rights and Obgerfell.

That said... No. I bet you could probably pull some gross DNA off of them, still.
 
Dershowitz was Epstein's lawyer at one time, so its no surprise he would be in the pictures.

Obviously, but Dershowitz was connected to Trump through Epstein's and other NY elites' parties.

Is there something (or someone) in these photos we didn't know (or suspect) before? And the sex toys are a bit of a yawn. Not my thing, but whatever you stick up your butt or vag (or someone else's with their consent) is not my business.

So you are claiming that Epstein was using the toys, handcuffs, and ball gags on consenting adults.
I know one of my concerns about this case is... not kink shaming Jeffrey Epstein?
 
So you are claiming that Epstein was using the toys, handcuffs, and ball gags on consenting adults.
I'm not claiming anything about whether they were used on adults or minors or both. Is there evidence one way or another? I assumed it was the sight of the sex toys themselves that bothered you. There are MLM schemes where women throw parties selling these sex toys. Its all fairly mainstream and out in the open these days (unless you're Amish).
 
Dershowitz was Epstein's lawyer at one time, so its no surprise he would be in the pictures.

Obviously, but Dershowitz was connected to Trump through Epstein's and other NY elites' parties.

Is there something (or someone) in these photos we didn't know (or suspect) before? And the sex toys are a bit of a yawn. Not my thing, but whatever you stick up your butt or vag (or someone else's with their consent) is not my business.

So you are claiming that Epstein was using the toys, handcuffs, and ball gags on consenting adults.
I mean, he says that, but project 2026 just dropped, and it's targeting gay rights and Obgerfell.

That said... No. I bet you could probably pull some gross DNA off of them, still.
"Trump doesn't know anything about Project 2026!!!11"
 
Dershowitz was Epstein's lawyer at one time, so its no surprise he would be in the pictures.

Obviously, but Dershowitz was connected to Trump through Epstein's and other NY elites' parties.

Is there something (or someone) in these photos we didn't know (or suspect) before? And the sex toys are a bit of a yawn. Not my thing, but whatever you stick up your butt or vag (or someone else's with their consent) is not my business.

So you are claiming that Epstein was using the toys, handcuffs, and ball gags on consenting adults.
I mean, he says that, but project 2026 just dropped, and it's targeting gay rights and Obgerfell.

That said... No. I bet you could probably pull some gross DNA off of them, still.
"Trump doesn't know anything about Project 2026!!!11"
"It doesn't look like anything at all".
 
So you are claiming that Epstein was using the toys, handcuffs, and ball gags on consenting adults.
I'm not claiming anything about whether they were used on adults or minors or both. Is there evidence one way or another? I assumed it was the sight of the sex toys themselves that bothered you.

So you assumed I was bothered AND you assumed I was bothered by sex toys. You used an assumption to make an ad hom to what point? Defense of Epstein?

There are MLM schemes where women throw parties selling these sex toys. Its all fairly mainstream and out in the open these days (unless you're Amish).

Yes and there are penis cakes none of which has anything to do with the context of Epstein -- a man with a known predilection for teenage girls. Why are you removing the context?
 
So you assumed I was bothered AND you assumed I was bothered by sex toys. You used an assumption to make an ad hom to what point? Defense of Epstein?
It was the fact that you specifically cited "sex toys", i.e. to quote, "Some of these photos are of toys and other things...". The "non-sex toy" photos are just of fully clothed people (all of whom we already knew hung out with Epstein to some degree). I'm not sure pictures of sex toys count as NSFW...maybe. If there were nudity and sex scenes, you'd have a point. A funny looking black glove?...Meh.

ETA: Any sex toy experts here who can identify some of those items in the "erotic paraphenalia" picture? Like the chain with a couple of black tipped doohickies at the end? Or that bent piece of metal in front of the box? Or that thing with the pressure gauge? I'm starting to worry now that maybe I haven't really lived a fullfilling life?! :unsure:
 
Last edited:
So you are claiming that Epstein was using the toys, handcuffs, and ball gags on consenting adults.
I'm not claiming anything about whether they were used on adults or minors or both. Is there evidence one way or another? I assumed it was the sight of the sex toys themselves that bothered you.

So you assumed I was bothered AND you assumed I was bothered by sex toys. You used an assumption to make an ad hom to what point? Defense of Epstein?

There are MLM schemes where women throw parties selling these sex toys. Its all fairly mainstream and out in the open these days (unless you're Amish).

Yes and there are penis cakes none of which has anything to do with the context of Epstein -- a man with a known predilection for teenage girls. Why are you removing the context?
So you're suggesting he's defending Epstein and therefore he's probably a secret paedophile?

There's a lot of this horseshit going on around this place, little sideways hints that some posters are total scumbags in hiding. It's getting fucked up.
 
So you're suggesting he's defending Epstein and therefore he's probably a secret paedophile
Yes, actually, at this point I AM!

Instead of having concerns over the fact that it does look like the island was a place for secret and private sexual activities, some of which apparently involved a dental chair surrounded by masks of historic dictators, we are just told to think these are innocent sex toys.

You don't fly to a private island to have innocent normal orgies.

If I want to attend a "Bible study" I can just show up to the NYE party.

That said, there's a new picture of Epstein hanging with Trump and Clinton and Prince Andrew, and I hope they all fucking burn.
 
So you're suggesting he's defending Epstein and therefore he's probably a secret paedophile
Yes, actually, at this point I AM!

Instead of having concerns over the fact that it does look like the island was a place for secret and private sexual activities, some of which apparently involved a dental chair surrounded by masks of historic dictators, we are just told to think these are innocent sex toys.

You don't fly to a private island to have innocent normal orgies.

If I want to attend a "Bible study" I can just show up to the NYE party.

That said, there's a new picture of Epstein hanging with Trump and Clinton and Prince Andrew, and I hope they all fucking burn.
Jahryn, that is fucked up. You are one of the people I referred to, with your repeated suggestions and innuendos to the effect that certain members here are not what they seem or claim to be, but are hiding some awful degeneracy. So many of you are so upset about Trump, and with good reason, that any pushback, any questioning of the accepted narrative, is taken as some kind of admission to a hidden quality that is despicable. We even see the statement, "Every accusation is an admission". At first I thought that referred just to Trump and the GOP in general, but now I don't.

Some of you need to be able to discuss things rationally without jumping to conclusions and accusing others of terrible things based on a paranoid hunch. I long for the old days when that was possible. I get a suspicion of my own, which is probably paranoia, and that is that some have developed a habit of psychological sleuthing, of ferreting out the deplorables, and that the place is sometimes awash in self-congratulation and hyper moralistic arrogance. Like a left version of McCarthyism.

I'm logging out and taking a break. It's too hard for me to type on this little device, and I have so much to say but I've been reluctant to say it...
 
I'm occasionally (or often) skeptical of claims that people on the left are acting under "hyper-moralistic arrogance", because having basic compassion and concern for human rights is seen by many on the right as an example of hyper-moralistic arrogance. Many of the people you are defending do not seem have much or any concern for human rights, they have shown that with their comments about immigration and various other issues (they'll even go so far as to deny immigrants are being put in concentration camps, will constantly make excuses for police murders, etc). So I can't fully agree.
 
Last edited:
You are one of the people I referred to, with your repeated suggestions and innuendos to the effect that certain members here are not what they seem or claim to be, but are hiding some awful degeneracy
Yes, I do think that people who regularly defend awful people in the course of awful things they do, are likely awful people.

The whole "15 isn't a 'child'" 'defense' is chief among these.

It is "flocking together", commonly done by "birds of a feather".

I have not made any secret that I wish to do something very close to genocide with respect to ending long-term Solipsism and Nihilism and Fatalism entirely, forever, through education, opportunities, and family planning efforts: I wish to end the existence entirely of those who would place themselves above others, those who would burn the world, and those who would place others above the group, to free humanity forever of gods, masters, kings, and (jokers).

You don't have to be paranoid about that. I have very clearly stated that my version of heaven is one in which every tyrant and psychotic and sycophant eventually dies or is put in storage and it never really becomes a problem again.

Yes, I will actively identify such people today with the express purpose of either presenting them with every opportunity to reject their theism or to find joy in their own existence as an alternative to putting them in a padded room until they're dirt, but I will absolutely endorse putting them in a padded room until they are dirt!

I absolutely have weird interests of my own. I mean shit, I run a store for sex apparel and absolutely won't share some of the disgusting porn I generate... I just abide by ethical standards as I do it. In fact one of my interests in understanding ethics was to understand where those lines would be so I wouldn't cross them... But in seeing the line, I can see that many people don't even believe there is a line and many people insist on crossing it.

The problem here is that I don't need to engage in any extraordinary action to do any of that.

I don't need an island worth of privacy for that.

So what is different about what these people are doing? Why the secrecy? Why the lack of oversight? Why the coverup? Why not just a full and honest interest in investigating the irregularities and uncovering the truth, and why instead preemptive explanations?

If it looks bad, you should be capable at least if saying it looks bad.

Of course, assholes and shitty people and pedophiles make this whole song and dance and suspicion necessary because it's not like they're tripping over themselves to seek justice for the people they violate. The only way to detect them is then with extraordinary efforts and careful examination and paying attention to every bit and lead that drops: through sleuthing.

So what the fuck else are we supposed to do given the knowledge of how deep this rot runs?
 
Oh, and leftists aren't the ones currently trying to make Palantir a thing. There's your McCarthyism (not you specifically. General you).
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure pictures of sex toys count as NSFW
Do you work WITH sex toys?
If not, being caught with that picture on your computer will show that you are definatly NOT working. And probably earn you a trip to the HR office. It doesn't need to be discusting to be NSFW.
AD&D on your computer is NSFW.
 
I'm not sure pictures of sex toys count as NSFW
Do you work WITH sex toys?
If not, being caught with that picture on your computer will show that you are definatly NOT working. And probably earn you a trip to the HR office. It doesn't need to be discusting to be NSFW.
AD&D on your computer is NSFW.
No I don't work with sex toys. Whether something is NSFW is at the discretion of the employer. Some are more lax than others, which is why I used the word, Maybe (that you left off).

What is AD&D?
 
Back
Top Bottom