• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

News sucks

the equivalent of giving a user a motorbike in a bicycle race,
My view is more like steroids in a bike race. If it's use causes problems, Yes it is the falt of the user, But you still forbid it's use.
The 'optics' may be that I am blaming AI, But in reality I blame users and would take their toy away. AI may be a tool for you. For users I see on the internet, it's a misused toy.
 
But that's not a problem with AI. That's a problem with the person using it.
Maybe, but it's a problem for everyone.

AI is pissing in the Internet punchbowl.

Whether that's a problem with piss, or a problem with the guy who pisses, it's a problem for everyone who wants to be able to consume the Internet's content.

AI is bad because it generates pollution - misinformation - but AI pollution is worse than most, because there is a huge amount of it, and it is extremely hard to detect.

There are lots of flags that indicate that a text was written by a person who doesn't know what he is talking about. AI is extremely good at avoiding those red flags; It is a confident and convincing liar.

It doesn't know it's lying; It consequently doesn't give itself away by subconsciously providing defensive clues that a human liar would find hard to avoid, nor by trying to hedge its bets in anticipation of being called out.

Such effective liars are rare amongst humans, but are dangerous nonetheless, despite the very small contribution they can make to our total store of information.

AI can (and is) generating vast torrents of highly confident and plausible sounding falsehoods. This is not going to end well.
 
But that's not a problem with AI. That's a problem with the person using it.
Maybe, but it's a problem for everyone.

AI is pissing in the Internet punchbowl.

Whether that's a problem with piss, or a problem with the guy who pisses, it's a problem for everyone who wants to be able to consume the Internet's content.

AI is bad because it generates pollution - misinformation - but AI pollution is worse than most, because there is a huge amount of it, and it is extremely hard to detect.

There are lots of flags that indicate that a text was written by a person who doesn't know what he is talking about. AI is extremely good at avoiding those red flags; It is a confident and convincing liar.

It doesn't know it's lying; It consequently doesn't give itself away by subconsciously providing defensive clues that a human liar would find hard to avoid, nor by trying to hedge its bets in anticipation of being called out.

Such effective liars are rare amongst humans, but are dangerous nonetheless, despite the very small contribution they can make to our total store of information.

AI can (and is) generating vast torrents of highly confident and plausible sounding falsehoods. This is not going to end well.

I get it. You don't like new stuff. Things were better in the good old days. You spent your life understanding the world and now you need to learn new stuff. Wtf.

I was young when the Internet came. You sound exactly like those old curmudgeon's annoyed by any change.

Dude, your criticisms have no substance. You might as well be railing against the decadence of rock'n'roll music
 
Back
Top Bottom