Is white genocide in our future?

[RVonse]

That's like saying, "the black race will improve when we get traits from other races in there."
That would sound like a plan to make blacks go extinct, would it not?

No, it does not.
You don't make anything 'go extinct' by successfully having offspring.
People having further generations of kids is NOT a path to or a plan for extinction, nor any form of genocide.
it IS a worry for racists who think that their race needs to be racially pure. Because racism.
But then again, genes flow downstream.

1) No amount of mixed-race heritage will ever flow back upstream to make you any less white than you already are.

2) This is only even tangentially a concern for people who will have offspring.

Most people in the know have already conceded that human evolution has been short circuited by technology. Where that takes us is anyones guess, without regards to skin color. The sci fiction writers who draw the grey skinned aliens are probably more correct than they know about where our skin color will be after all the mating of blacks and whites and the passage of time.

As a serious aside, it is MUCH more probable that the entirely of the human race goes extinct anyway. Throughout global history extinctions have been the rule and not the exception. We aren't going to be here much longer.

 

[Ford]

you are totally ignoring my actual question:

Hey Halfie, how do you define actual racism?

Blacks are 13% of the U.S. population and commit 50% of the murders. Wouldn't that qualify as more violent?

Exactly how was that %50 determined?

As an excuse.

See, the implicit argument is that blacks are inherently violent, and we could cut the number of murders in half if we just "did something" about them. Then the racists pat themselves on the back and say "but we're not advocating genocide...just saying that something needs to be done about those people."

But hey, changing demographics is white genocide, amiright?

 

[RVonse]

I am far from a white supremacist.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

EDIT: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

There have been a number of examples of people saying extremely racists things, and denying they are racist. I think that some (if they honestly don’t believe they are racist) maybe we’re exposed to racist propaganda/bullshit at a young age and it taints their thinking. Like they hear ‘blacks are more violent’, they never question it, or try to find out if it is true. It just sits in the back of their mind as a ‘fact’ that everyone knows is true. So when they repeat racist bullshit they think they are just telling the truth that some don’t like to hear. Maybe they think racism is actively hating some group, and since they don’t hate that group, they are just telling the ‘truth’ about them, therefore they are not racist.

Just a thought.

Hey Halfie, how do you define actual racism?

We are all racists, even you and everyone else on this forum. How do I know this?

Because 99% of all the porn on the world wide internet is WHITE porn. That means people from ALL races and nationalities throughout the world prefer white skinny women and only white skinny woman. The kind of looking woman that Trump married and everyone else is envious of.


And that is racist whether you admit you are or not.

 

[Keith&Co.]

How do I know this?

Because 99% of all the porn on the world wide internet is WHITE porn.

I would be interested in seeing the stats for this claim.
Because tge last time i was in an adult bookstore, the majority by a wide margin was interracial porn, followed by anal.
I suspect most of the power and effectiveness of porn comes from a tabboo. The more guilty the pleasure, the greater it pleases.
But i do not feel guilty about interracial sex, so maybe i am not racist?

Sitting here with my amputee dwarf porn....

That means people from ALL races and nationalities throughout the world prefer white skinny women and only white skinny woman.

I don't really think that follows.
Porn cycles thru fads like everything else, so unless racism is a fad, you can't really go by the market.
Twenty years ago, the stores I went in were full of Asian porn. Absolutely flooded. But was that the consumer's choice, or did it just become really easy to make and distribute porn in some Asian country?
You really would need a separate study to see what people want, to isolate how much of what is available is driven by ther reasons.

The kind of looking woman that Trump married and everyone else is envious of.

And that is racist whether you admit you are or not.

No, it is not. Favoring or disfavoring a sexual partner based on race is no more racism than it would be sexist to say you prefer to fuck women. That is not what racist means.

 

[RVonse]

Sitting here with my amputee dwarf porn....
I don't really think that follows.
Porn cycles thru fads like everything else, so unless racism is a fad, you can't really go by the market.

Sorry but nobody wants to fuck fat chicks....nobody. And like it or not being fat is highly influenced by race.
Yes, the fatty's do still get fucked but it is only when no better alternatives are available.

No, it is not. Favoring or disfavoring a sexual partner based on race is no more racism than it would be sexist to say you prefer to fuck women. That is not what racist means.

That is exactly what it is. Race is DNA. And DNA is fat, or white, or black, or anything else.

And like it or not 99% of the guys (any race) will gladly fuck any of the hotty girls from Norway or Switzerland. and pass on the fatty black one from the Congo. It isnt fair but it is the real preferences of men. It is racism.

This is where the liberals are complete hypocrites because they are just as racist with their preferences as anyone else. They just pretend like you do they arent.

 

[blastula]

Racism isn't about sexual attraction, but beauty tastes change over time and place.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Sitting here with my amputee dwarf porn....
I don't really think that follows.
Porn cycles thru fads like everything else, so unless racism is a fad, you can't really go by the market.

Sorry but nobody wants to fuck fat chicks....nobody.

wow. There are entire fetishes about Big Beautiful Women.
Silly, projecting your tastes onto the entire populatio .

And like it or not being fat is highly influenced by race.

'Influenced' is not an absolute.
And, still isn't racism...

Yes, the fatty's do still get fucked but it is only when no better alternatives are available.

Uh huh...sure.

No, it is not. Favoring or disfavoring a sexual partner based on race is no more racism than it would be sexist to say you prefer to fuck women. That is not what racist means.

That is exactly what it is. Race is DNA. And DNA is fat, or white, or black, or anything else.

Saying i like white chicks, or black chicks, or elves from Mirkwood is not racism because the statement describes ME. _I_ get a chubby for one or more different skin tones, describes my makeup. Not elves'.

Now, it isn't mutually exclusive to racism. I could say i prefer dwarf women because elves are all greedy, or they only bathe once a century. And that's describing an entire race, jot just me.

This is where the liberals are complete hypocrites because they are just as racist with their preferences as anyone else. They just pretend like you do they arent.

Nope.

This is where conservatives try to justify their racism by the misue of terms.

 

[RVonse]

Saying i like white chicks, or black chicks, or elves from Mirkwood is not racism because the statement describes ME.

Saying "you like white chicks or black chicks or elves from Mirkwood is not racism because the statement describes ME" is YOUR words and not mine. Yet that is EXACTLY the same statement as "I vote for Trump enforcing existing immegration laws and closing down our boarders because I prefer white people to brown people."

Either both statements are racist or they both are not. You simply can not have it both ways Keith. Please, lets have some honesty here.

And as far as a group being confused with the real meaning of terms and their explosive content of rhetoric, I would say that applies to liberal CNN far more than the conservatives.

 

[bilby]

If you want to know what the end result of a few hundred years of racial mixing will be, just look around you.

If you apply the 'one drop' rule, you discover that everyone is mixed race. White genocide isn't a risk for the future; It's something that started as soon as trade between widely separated regions became possible, and finished a few centuries after that.

If you instead apply a more relaxed criterion to separate black from white, then you discover that your criteria don't reflect the underlying genetic reality, and are therefore totally arbitrary and meaningless.

A lot of white supremacists have been very surprised and often quite upset at the results of their genetic testing. But then, they fucking deserve it, for being so strident about a subject that they didn't even know they didn't know shit about.

Humans mix. A lot. You only need to go back about four or five centuries to find that almost every person with living descendents is your ancestor.

It's a 'small world' network - just a small number of widely travelled and prolificly fertile men ensures that every human is genetically close to every other human.

Racism is based on abject ignorance of how genetics operates in the real world.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Saying i like white chicks, or black chicks, or elves from Mirkwood is not racism because the statement describes ME.

Saying "you like white chicks or black chicks or elves from Mirkwood is not racism because the statement describes ME" is YOUR words and not mine. Yet that is EXACTLY the same statement as "I vote for Trump enforcing existing immegration laws and closing down our boarders because I prefer white people to brown people."

no, that's not the same statement, unless you really want go limit immigration to people who make your dick hard.

But most people i see wearing the MAGA and trying to justify their ommigration stance do NOT phrase it as a personal preference. They try to make it about objective facts.
They insist that certain groups are predisposed to violence, crime, terrorism, drugs, and welfare.

They are basing their objections on how they describe the Other, not themselves.

Either both statements are racist or they both are not. You simply can not have it both ways Keith. Please, lets have some honesty here.

Sure. Honestly, the statements are not equivalent.
Except from maybe the 10,000 foot view... up close, they do not vompare.

And as far as a group being confused with the real meaning of terms and their explosive content of rhetoric, I would say that applies to liberal CNN far more than the conservatives.

sure. Of course.
It's CNN that developed 'alternative facts,' after all.
Fucking covefe basterds

 

[RVonse]

If you want to know what the end result of a few hundred years of racial mixing will be, just look around you.

If you apply the 'one drop' rule, you discover that everyone is mixed race. White genocide isn't a risk for the future; It's something that started as soon as trade between widely separated regions became possible, and finished a few centuries after that.

If you instead apply a more relaxed criterion to separate black from white, then you discover that your criteria don't reflect the underlying genetic reality, and are therefore totally arbitrary and meaningless.

A lot of white supremacists have been very surprised and often quite upset at the results of their genetic testing. But then, they fucking deserve it, for being so strident about a subject that they didn't even know they didn't know shit about.

Humans mix. A lot. You only need to go back about four or five centuries to find that almost every person with living descendents is your ancestor.

It's a 'small world' network - just a small number of widely travelled and prolificly fertile men ensures that every human is genetically close to every other human.

Racism is based on abject ignorance of how genetics operates in the real world.

Its not just genetics but culture. Sure, we are all

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Already addressed and went unrefuted in post #142

Blacks are 13% of the U.S. population and commit 50% of the murders. Wouldn't that qualify as more violent?

Obviously this doesn't mean I see a black person and go, "OMG! He's a murderer because blacks are 13% and commit 50%!"

But overall, that number is very scary.

The problem here is that you're focusing on the wrong attribute.

Yes, blacks commit about 50% of crime. It's not because they are black, though--the driving force here is the inner cities where crime is a normal way of life.

 

[RVonse]

If you want to know what the end result of a few hundred years of racial mixing will be, just look around you.

If you apply the 'one drop' rule, you discover that everyone is mixed race. White genocide isn't a risk for the future; It's something that started as soon as trade between widely separated regions became possible, and finished a few centuries after that.

If you instead apply a more relaxed criterion to separate black from white, then you discover that your criteria don't reflect the underlying genetic reality, and are therefore totally arbitrary and meaningless.

A lot of white supremacists have been very surprised and often quite upset at the results of their genetic testing. But then, they fucking deserve it, for being so strident about a subject that they didn't even know they didn't know shit about.

Humans mix. A lot. You only need to go back about four or five centuries to find that almost every person with living descendents is your ancestor.

It's a 'small world' network - just a small number of widely travelled and prolificly fertile men ensures that every human is genetically close to every other human.

Racism is based on abject ignorance of how genetics operates in the real world.

Its not just genetics or DNA though, its culture. What if one culture is better than another? IMHO, the successful culture should be teaching the unsuccessful culture and not the other way around. And if the people from the unsuccessful culture dont want to accept or learn from what has been proven successful then they should find a different tribe.

A lot of people would argue that US culture is shit but it has still gone further (in terms of technology, standard of living) then most all others with the possible exception of Russia or China. So with this known, why do the liberals insist (other than their own self interest) we immigrate people who have no desire to integrate into American culture?

The reason mankind went to the moon was because both the Russian culture and the US culture competed and wanted it. I think its a shame that this same type of culture that values technolgy and engineering is soon to be lost.....thanks to Nancy, Chuck, and the other Democrats with their dream to manufacture more leftist voters for themselves.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

We are all racists, even you and everyone else on this forum. How do I know this?

Because 99% of all the porn on the world wide internet is WHITE porn. That means people from ALL races and nationalities throughout the world prefer white skinny women and only white skinny woman. The kind of looking woman that Trump married and everyone else is envious of.


And that is racist whether you admit you are or not.

Just did a simple little research project. Local adult store, looking over their website. Select movies and I get 6 categories (things like "new releases"--nothing that implies anything about the race of any performer), 5 showing 4 featured titles each and the last with 5. There are a total of 49 people depicted clearly enough for me to be sure I'm looking at discrete individuals. Of these I see 4 that I believe are 1 Hispanic and 3 Asian and there's one that's black. The remainder appear to be white. (There are a couple that I'm not certain between well-tanned white and Hispanic.) That gives 90%, not 99%.

Examining the bestseller DVDs, page 1 I get a total of 99 performers. 9 Asian, 1 Hispanic and 8 black. That gives only 81% white.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Sorry but nobody wants to fuck fat chicks....nobody. And like it or not being fat is highly influenced by race.

Never hear of BBW porn?

 

[Loren Pechtel]

If you want to know what the end result of a few hundred years of racial mixing will be, just look around you.

If you apply the 'one drop' rule, you discover that everyone is mixed race. White genocide isn't a risk for the future; It's something that started as soon as trade between widely separated regions became possible, and finished a few centuries after that.

Yup--by the one-drop rule I'm Asian. Given the DNA results I would say 8 generations back.

 

[Jarhyn]

Already addressed and went unrefuted in post #142

Blacks are 13% of the U.S. population and commit 50% of the murders. Wouldn't that qualify as more violent?

Obviously this doesn't mean I see a black person and go, "OMG! He's a murderer because blacks are 13% and commit 50%!"

But overall, that number is very scary.

The problem here is that you're focusing on the wrong attribute.

Yes, blacks commit about 50% of crime. It's not because they are black, though--the driving force here is the inner cities where crime is a normal way of life.

The inner cities: where a perfect storm of lead toxicity, endemic racism, cultural bias, and underfunding of education drive a lack of opportunities to do little other than continue the "family business" of criminal enterprise.

Loren, how can you deny that something needs to be done to rectify the inequality present here, when we have a clear example of someone who would clearly use the existence of the effect to justify the very things that created the effect?

 

[Gun Nut]

Youtube comments? Again?

Jesus fuck, dude.

IKR? And seriously, I've detailed maybe 10-15 times now on these very forums the phenomena of how people predictably get indoctrinated into racism against their own race, not to mention others (particularly in the case of MAGA against people of Hispanic descent, though also other forms of non-race prejudice and intimidation).

It usually goes something along the lines of "the messages presented to society which create white racist thought against black people is also something black people are exposed, and as equally capable humans, certainly not immune to."

But Halfie has a pretty strong case of "political amnesia", where some may forget an argument after a matter of days, I suspect he could blank one out after a matter of seconds.

When you have hundreds of likes over a comment such as, "I'm a black Trump supporter" on right-wing channels, I can assure you it's not left-wing trolls swarming in by the hundreds just to like that post.

Russian Bots, then?

 

[Jarhyn]

When you have hundreds of likes over a comment such as, "I'm a black Trump supporter" on right-wing channels, I can assure you it's not left-wing trolls swarming in by the hundreds just to like that post.

Russian Bots, then?

More, rule of large numbers + confirmation bias; see also: "I have black/gay/Mexican friends"

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Already addressed and went unrefuted in post #142

Blacks are 13% of the U.S. population and commit 50% of the murders. Wouldn't that qualify as more violent?

Obviously this doesn't mean I see a black person and go, "OMG! He's a murderer because blacks are 13% and commit 50%!"

But overall, that number is very scary.

The problem here is that you're focusing on the wrong attribute.

Yes, blacks commit about 50% of crime. It's not because they are black, though--the driving force here is the inner cities where crime is a normal way of life.

The inner cities: where a perfect storm of lead toxicity, endemic racism, cultural bias, and underfunding of education drive a lack of opportunities to do little other than continue the "family business" of criminal enterprise.

Loren, how can you deny that something needs to be done to rectify the inequality present here, when we have a clear example of someone who would clearly use the existence of the effect to justify the very things that created the effect?

Where do you get the notion that I think nothing should be done?

What I'm saying is that you have to identify the actual issue before you have much of a hope of dealing with it. If you say it's due to discrimination against blacks your efforts won't be directed towards fixing the inner cities.

(And note that in most places the education isn't underfunded, it's that the money goes to things like security. There's also no point into putting it into good things in the classroom because they are either broken or stolen. You also have the issue that better teachers will refuse to work in the inner cities for safety reasons.)

It's just easy to blame discrimination because that doesn't have a cost other than to those you accuse of discriminating. Actually fixing the problem is neither easy nor cheap.