It was a question I put to you based on what you yourself claimed. It was not my turn to explain, it was yours. You made an attempt, but your attempt fell short, as pointed out. Hence my last remark; you need to do better.
It was a question I put to you based on what you yourself claimed. It was not my turn to explain, it was yours. You made an attempt, but your attempt fell short, as pointed out. Hence my last remark; you need to do better.
It was a question I put to you based on what you yourself claimed. It was not my turn to explain, it was yours. You made an attempt, but your attempt fell short, as pointed out. Hence my last remark; you need to do better.
That doesn't relate to what I said. I pointed out that quantum substructure and activity is common to all types and species of brain....but the behavioural output is different between species and individuals, based not on quantum substructure or what that happens to be doing, but the neural architecture of the brain.....
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.