• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Epstein, Kiddies, And Trump. Oh, My

She was a victim of circumstances.
That's not what the article was implying, and you know it.

IMHO, it is sleazy for men of Gaetz’s age snd higher to buy sex from teenagers. Certainly without such sleazes, the demand for teenage prostitues would be much less,
She claimed to be an adult. Is it "sleazy" to seek out adult sex workers?
What if this chick had given a false age of 20? Would Gaetz not have been "sleazy" any more? Or would you still find some reason to condemn him?

I find it quite hypocritical that Gaetz is mercilessly attacked for this while we are told on this forum that a Democratic state legislator getting child porn of 5 year olds (!) is not a big deal because New Hampshire is a small state.
 
She was a victim of circumstances.
That's not what the article was implying, and you know it.
I know she was a victim of circumstances.
IMHO, it is sleazy for men of Gaetz’s age snd higher to buy sex from teenagers. Certainly without such sleazes, the demand for teenage prostitues would be much less,
She claimed to be an adult. Is it "sleazy" to seek out adult sex workers?
I wrote “teenagers”. She claimed to be 18. I stand by my statement.
What if this chick had given a false age of 20? Would Gaetz not have been "sleazy" any more? Or would you still find some reason to condemn him?
There are plenty of reasons to think Matt Gaetz is sleazy. Do you need a list?

I find it quite hypocritical that Gaetz is mercilessly attacked for this while we are told on this forum that a Democratic state legislator getting child porn of 5 year olds (!) is not a big deal because New Hampshire is a small state.
I know I didn’t say anything like that because I have no idea about your “whataboutism”.
 
She claimed to be an adult. Is it "sleazy" to seek out adult sex workers who look like children?
Added the bit you "forgot" to include in your rhetorical question.

With that clause restored, the answer is clearly "yes".

It's perhaps, in some circumstances, not immoral. In some jurisdictions, it's not illegal. But yes, it's absolutely and unquestionably sleazy.
 
I find it quite hypocritical that Gaetz is mercilessly attacked for this while we are told on this forum that a Democratic state legislator getting child porn of 5 year olds (!) is not a big deal because New Hampshire is a small state.
Are these things both being done by the same poster, or do you just not know what "hypocritical" even means?
 
She claimed to be an adult. Is it "sleazy" to seek out adult sex workers who look like children?
Added the bit you "forgot" to include in your rhetorical question.
Why do you say that she looked like a "child" - to the point of falsifying my comment? Does she have Hutchinson-Gilford or something?
'
Be specific. Or are you simply assuming?
 
Are these things both being done by the same poster, or do you just not know what "hypocritical" even means?
To use the term so beloved by that particular poster, you are part of his "Ilk".

But let me ask you specifically, do you agree with him that Stacie-Marie Laughton is not a big deal, but that Matt Gaetz is?
 
She claimed to be an adult. Is it "sleazy" to seek out adult sex workers who look like children?
Added the bit you "forgot" to include in your rhetorical question.

With that clause restored, the answer is clearly "yes".

It's perhaps, in some circumstances, not immoral. In some jurisdictions, it's not illegal. But yes, it's absolutely and unquestionably sleazy.
So, I'm going to say it's not sleezy for adults to have sex with people who look, act, and/or dress like children, assuming those people are adults with meaningful choices of other things to do with their time for money.

When those people lack meaningful choices over what to do with their time for money, it is among the most sleezy of sleezy things they can do.

Pretty much any use of leverage to get anyone to do anything when they have a lack of meaningful choices over what to do with their time for money is sleazy.

Doing so while wishing they actually were a child, and wishing for an opportunity to do so, that IS the sleaziest thing you can do short of actually looking at CSAM or molesting a child.

But JUST looking at porn that's like that, especially with the gladness that those who made or participated in it wanted to and were of age and capable of consenting to it? Honestly, I find it sleazy when people denigrate that.

This firmly puts any activity of booking such a sex worker in the US strongly in "sleaze" territory.
 
Why do you say that she looked like a "child" -
Because she was very young. Are you suggesting that she could pass for a similar age as Matt Gaetz
to the point of falsifying my comment?
Oh fucking spare me. Your comment started life as an attempt to conceal the facts, and I made it less untrue, not more so.
Does she have Hutchinson-Gilford or something?
She has something. It's called "youth", and Matt Gaetz clearly lacks it.
'
Be specific. Or are you simply assuming?
Specifically, you are being disgusting, and your pedantry and hair splitting is worsening, not improving, your image.

Stop digging.
 
But let me ask you specifically, do you agree with him that Stacie-Marie Laughton is not a big deal, but that Matt Gaetz is?
Given that I have no fucking clue who Stacie-Marie Laughton is, and that even I know who Matt Gaetz is, I am going to say that anything the former does is far less of a big deal to me than anything the latter does.

In the spirit of your lawyerly nit-picking horseshit, I will point out that I say this without prejudice to the question of whether "he" (still a person unspecified) actually held the opinion you allege.

Given your clear inability to recognise that your opponents are not interchangeable clones, I strongly suspect that your assertion is false.
 
Because she was very young. Are you suggesting that she could pass for a similar age as Matt Gaetz
You claimed that she looked like a child. Which is a very different claim.
Nobody claimed that she looked like she was in her 30s.
Do you think people should be only be allowed to have sex with people who are or look to be of similar age as them?
Oh fucking spare me. Your comment started life as an attempt to conceal the facts, and I made it less untrue, not more so.
I did not conceal anything. She advertised as being 18, an adult. That is a fact, not concealment of it.
Your fictitious claim that she looked "like a child" because she did not look like she was in her 30s is concealing facts.
She has something. It's called "youth", and Matt Gaetz clearly lacks it.
Irrelevant to the fact that she advertised as being a young adult. I.e. Gaetz was not seeking out minors.
Specifically, you are being disgusting, and your pedantry and hair splitting is worsening, not improving, your image.
Stop digging.
It is not pedantry to make truthful claims. What is disgusting is your insistence that anybody who looks younger than 30s "looks like a child".

But thanks to you and the Hound for proving my point that the moral panic your Ilk is inciting has the goal of expanding age of adulthood well beyond 18.
 
I mean, the reason nobody on the left is still talking about the New Hampshire pedo because we already said our piece, and it was such an easy piece because we don't want to fuck children: we celebrate his capture and inevitable path to justice.

It's really that easy.

If Republicans could push justice on Gaetz or Trump or any of the other myriad of powerful pedophiles among them, we wouldn't be in this position, though, of them not being on a clearly inevitable path to justice.
 
Do you think people should be only be allowed to have sex with people who are or look to be of similar age as them?
No, I think people should only be allowed to have sex with people who are not in a position to abuse the power relationship between them to coerce that sex.

Rich old men should not be fucking poor young women, for the same reason that a Colonel should not be fucking a Sargeant.

This is not rocket science.
 
Back
Top Bottom