Define God

[pood]

Fascists are Jews. Nazis are Jews. Communists are Jews. I guess Sikhs, Catholics, Buddhists, evengelical Christians. Muslims and nihilists are all Jews, too.

Who can argue with reasoning like that?

 

[No Robots]

^This quotation is from Waton's "A Program For The Jews And An Answer To All Anti Semites". I highly recommend this work.

​

 

[pood]

^This quotation is from Waton's "A Program For The Jews And An Answer To All Anti Semites". I highly recommend this work.

​

So everyone is Jew whether they know it or not? Even Nazis?

 

[pood]

Can you try to defend your claims without relying on the crutches of quotes from others?

 

[pood]

It appears Waton has simply redefined “human” as “Jew.”

 

[No Robots]

Can you try to defend your claims without relying on the crutches of quotes from others?

Can I get across the continent without relying on the crutches of cars built by others?

 

[pood]

Can you try to defend your claims without relying on the crutches of quotes from others?

Can I get across the continent without relying on the crutches of cars built by others?

Sure you can. But even if a car is the easiest way to go, you can explain what the car is and how and why it works.

It appears you can’t do that for what you claim. You simply parrot stuff … robotically.

How about addressing my previous posts that show the contradictions in your claims?

 

[No Robots]

^This quotation is from Waton's "A Program For The Jews And An Answer To All Anti Semites". I highly recommend this work.

​

So everyone is Jew whether they know it or not? Even Nazis?

Especially Nazis. I have previously quoted John Macmurray on this. Here is the quotation again:

Hitler’s declaration that the Jewish consciousness is poison to the Aryan races is the deepest insight that the Western world has yet achieved into its own nature; and his capacity to realize this is the proof of his genius as well as the secret of his power and of the curious fascination which his personality exerts. One has only to attend to the form of the statement to see that it is not the practical power or wealth of the Jews that he fears, but the character of the Jewish mind. It is the Jewish consciousness which is the enemy, not an organized Jewish army, not even an insurrection of the Jews in Germany. It is the hidden penetration of the Jewish spirit into the Gentile mind that is the danger; and it is a danger because the “Aryan” mind cannot resist it, but must succumb. The task is to extirpate the influence of the Jewish consciousness upon the world. At all costs the leaven must be got out of the lump, or very soon the whole will be leavened, and the result will be the final end of the “Aryan” (sc. pagan) tradition. Europe will be so false to itself that it will create a universal communism, which will destroy blood and race as the basis of civilization, destroy the beauties and the heroisms of the struggle for power, deny the natural superiority of the white races, and of Germans in particular, and produce universal equality and brotherhood. The Jewish spirit is not merely under the illusion of these ideas; it is the force, in the world, which creates them in idea and compels the rest of humanity to achieve them in practice.

The destiny of mankind is universal Marxism and Judaism. This is the inevitable conclusion of philosophy and this is why philosophy is rejected or distorted by almost everyone.

 

[No Robots]

Can you try to defend your claims without relying on the crutches of quotes from others?

Can I get across the continent without relying on the crutches of cars built by others?

Sure you can. But even if a car is the easiest way to go, you can explain what the car is and how and why it works.

It appears you can’t do that for what you claim. You simply parrot stuff … robotically.

How about addressing my previous posts that show the contradictions in your claims?

Your "contradictions" are chaff, idle quibbling. Read the works I reference.

 

[pood]

Can you try to defend your claims without relying on the crutches of quotes from others?

Can I get across the continent without relying on the crutches of cars built by others?

Sure you can. But even if a car is the easiest way to go, you can explain what the car is and how and why it works.

It appears you can’t do that for what you claim. You simply parrot stuff … robotically.

How about addressing my previous posts that show the contradictions in your claims?

Your "contradictions" are chaff, idle quibbling. Read the works I reference.

I don’t care about the works you reference. I want to hear from YOU.

 

[pood]

Can you try to defend your claims without relying on the crutches of quotes from others?

Can I get across the continent without relying on the crutches of cars built by others?

Sure you can. But even if a car is the easiest way to go, you can explain what the car is and how and why it works.

It appears you can’t do that for what you claim. You simply parrot stuff … robotically.

How about addressing my previous posts that show the contradictions in your claims?

Your "contradictions" are chaff, idle quibbling. Read the works I reference.

Quibbling? You reject pantheism yet invoke Spinoza who was a pantheist. You say especially Nazis are Jews. Why should anyone take this crap seriously? It would appear that you have your own private definition of Judaism which the rest of the world does not share.

 

[No Robots]

I don’t care about the works you reference. I want to hear from YOU.

For the purpose of defending my ideas, I'm nothing but a megaphone. I use my sources as aan interlocking network of mutually reinforcing arguments. That's it.

For the purpose of operationalizing these ideas, I might have something to say about myself. For example, why do I spend so much time using this forum? There are many reasons, but I doubt they would be of any real interest to anyone.

 

[pood]

Right. I think your hero Waton said that Nazism is an imitation of Judaism. With that reasoning of course mayonnaise is an imitation of Judaism. More twaddle like that.

 

[pood]

I don’t care about the works you reference. I want to hear from YOU.

For the purpose of defending my ideas, I'm nothing but a megaphone.

So you have no mind of your own. Got it.

 

[No Robots]

Can you try to defend your claims without relying on the crutches of quotes from others?

Can I get across the continent without relying on the crutches of cars built by others?

Sure you can. But even if a car is the easiest way to go, you can explain what the car is and how and why it works.

It appears you can’t do that for what you claim. You simply parrot stuff … robotically.

How about addressing my previous posts that show the contradictions in your claims?

Your "contradictions" are chaff, idle quibbling. Read the works I reference.

Quibbling? You reject pantheism yet invoke Spinoza who was a pantheist. You say especially Nazis are Jews. Why should anyone take this crap seriously? It would appear that you have your own private definition of Judaism which the rest of the world does not share.

I'm quite proud of the fact that I appear to be the only person advancing these ideas in an aggressive way. I'm so grateful to the thinkers I refer to for providing me with the key to a way of life that is perfectly satisfying. I offer my testimony here as an act of service, devotion and gratitude. Maybe I'll spare somebody the effort of having to search as I did.

Anyway, that's it for tonight, and tomorrow promises to be the start of a tough week. Again, thanks for the interaction.

 

[pood]

Can you try to defend your claims without relying on the crutches of quotes from others?

Can I get across the continent without relying on the crutches of cars built by others?

Sure you can. But even if a car is the easiest way to go, you can explain what the car is and how and why it works.

It appears you can’t do that for what you claim. You simply parrot stuff … robotically.

How about addressing my previous posts that show the contradictions in your claims?

Your "contradictions" are chaff, idle quibbling. Read the works I reference.

Quibbling? You reject pantheism yet invoke Spinoza who was a pantheist. You say especially Nazis are Jews. Why should anyone take this crap seriously? It would appear that you have your own private definition of Judaism which the rest of the world does not share.

I'm quite proud of the fact that I appear to be the only person advancing these ideas in an aggressive way.

What ideas? That Nazis are Jews?

I'm so grateful to the thinkers I refer to for providing me with the key to a way of life that is perfectly satisfying.

So the purpose of thinking is to find some bullshit that pumps feel-good chemicals into your brain? My view is quite the opposite — that thinking about stuff should challenge and even hurt you.

Please respond to this post.

You won’t, of course, not with your “tough week” ahead.

 

[steve_bank]

Sheesh ... I started a Marxism thread on social science so NR would not have to derail the forum..

It don't take a PHD in psychology. NR gets a positive self image and a purpose in life.