Climate Change(d)?

[DBT]

The new religion, it appears that some folk tend to favour political ideology over science.

Climate catastrophe is all about politics.

It's physics, not politics, that determines climate.

Your reading comprehension is poor.

You didn't understand what I said.

Your reading comprehension is actually shit.

Maybe it's your biased comprehension of the issue of climate change and unwillingness to consider that you may be wrong that is the problem?

Have you considered that possibility?

 

[steve_bank]

Maybe we are being too subtle with TSwizzle.

Maybe he does not realize we think he is a joke, and we do not tale him seriously.

 

[TSwizzle]

The new religion, it appears that some folk tend to favour political ideology over science.

Climate catastrophe is all about politics.

It's physics, not politics, that determines climate.

Your reading comprehension is poor.

You didn't understand what I said.

Your reading comprehension is actually shit.

Maybe it's your biased comprehension of the issue of climate change and unwillingness to consider that you may be wrong that is the problem?

Have you considered that possibility?

The issue is your reading comprehension is shit, fella.

 

[TSwizzle]

Maybe we are being too subtle with TSwizzle.

Maybe he does not realize we think he is a joke, and we do not tale him seriously.

I certainly don't take this bs thread seriously. But for whatever reason, you lot keep posting garbage to it.

The thread has gone around in circles for five years now. It's not a serious subject.

It is a catastrophic 78f in Santa Monica today.

 

[DBT]

The new religion, it appears that some folk tend to favour political ideology over science.

Climate catastrophe is all about politics.

It's physics, not politics, that determines climate.

Your reading comprehension is poor.

You didn't understand what I said.

Your reading comprehension is actually shit.

Maybe it's your biased comprehension of the issue of climate change and unwillingness to consider that you may be wrong that is the problem?

Have you considered that possibility?

The issue is your reading comprehension is shit, fella.

I think that what you need is a nice shiny mirror to gaze into. It's doubtful, but who knows, it may help.

 

[TSwizzle]

The new religion, it appears that some folk tend to favour political ideology over science.

Climate catastrophe is all about politics.

It's physics, not politics, that determines climate.

Your reading comprehension is poor.

You didn't understand what I said.

Your reading comprehension is actually shit.

Maybe it's your biased comprehension of the issue of climate change and unwillingness to consider that you may be wrong that is the problem?

Have you considered that possibility?

The issue is your reading comprehension is shit, fella.

I think that what you need is a nice shiny mirror to gaze into. It's doubtful, but who knows, it may help.

What you need is a lesson in reading comprehension.

 

[DBT]

The new religion, it appears that some folk tend to favour political ideology over science.

Climate catastrophe is all about politics.

It's physics, not politics, that determines climate.

Your reading comprehension is poor.

You didn't understand what I said.

Your reading comprehension is actually shit.

Maybe it's your biased comprehension of the issue of climate change and unwillingness to consider that you may be wrong that is the problem?

Have you considered that possibility?

The issue is your reading comprehension is shit, fella.

I think that what you need is a nice shiny mirror to gaze into. It's doubtful, but who knows, it may help.

What you need is a lesson in reading comprehension.

Where's your mirror? Have you tossed it away? The physical process of climate change has nothing to do with politics. Climate is a matter of physics, the gasses we pump into the atmosphere in addition to natural processes. That is the issue.

Your denial of the issue and the science behind it is where politics comes into it, where your position on the matter is political rather than scientific.

Are you able to grasp the distinction?

 

[bilby]

The thread has gone around in circles for five years now. It's not a serious subject.

Today I learned that @TSwizzle knows so little about climate science that he thinks five years is a long time.

Even YECs are able to think in terms of centuries (even millennia as long as there are no more than half a dozen of them). But this fella reckons that if it hasn't dramatically affected Santa Monica within half a decade, it cannot be serious.

To quote well known social commentator K. T. Frog, "It's not easy being green".