• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Berkeley "liberals" contra free speech

 
 
 
Derec said:
What is called "liberal" in the US is anything but. As we can see from their anti-free speech attitudes.
Click to expand...

How exactly has your speech been infringed by these evil demons?

Or perhaps it is ALL in your imagination?
 
ZiprHead said:
Remember when the right said Obama was dividing the nation?
Click to expand...

Yeah, that was terrible. But it's over now.
Chitolini is a UNITER. He even said so.
Today I saw a FB page where a Chinese-American, an Englishwoman, an Australian and several other diverse characters were expressing one solidly united opinion - that Il Douchebag needs to be impeached or meet an untimely demise (there wasn't total unity about exactly what mechanism would be optimal, but about the outcome, they were UNITED).
 
Elixir said:
ZiprHead said:
Remember when the right said Obama was dividing the nation?
Click to expand...

Yeah, that was terrible. But it's over now.
Chitolini is a UNITER. He even said so.
Today I saw a FB page where a Chinese-American, an Englishwoman, an Australian and several other diverse characters were expressing one solidly united opinion - that Il Douchebag needs to be impeached or meet an untimely demise (there wasn't total unity about exactly what mechanism would be optimal, but about the outcome, they were UNITED).
Click to expand...

My dear Drama Queen, you can't impeach anyone if you don't have any logical reason to do so. Opinion means nothing. :)
 
whichphilosophy said:
Elixir said:
Yeah, that was terrible. But it's over now.
Chitolini is a UNITER. He even said so.
Today I saw a FB page where a Chinese-American, an Englishwoman, an Australian and several other diverse characters were expressing one solidly united opinion - that Il Douchebag needs to be impeached or meet an untimely demise (there wasn't total unity about exactly what mechanism would be optimal, but about the outcome, they were UNITED).
Click to expand...

My dear Drama Queen, you can't impeach anyone if you don't have any logical reason to do so. Opinion means nothing. :)
Click to expand...

Of course a president can be impeached by mere opinion.

Ask Bill Clinton.
 
untermensche said:
whichphilosophy said:
My dear Drama Queen, you can't impeach anyone if you don't have any logical reason to do so. Opinion means nothing. :)
Click to expand...

Of course a president can be impeached by mere opinion.

Ask Bill Clinton.
Click to expand...
He was a naughty boy but people liked him so it didn't matter.

Monika Lewinski spoke up in favour of Trump recently. Is there a place in the Oval office for her?
 
whichphilosophy said:
untermensche said:
Of course a president can be impeached by mere opinion.

Ask Bill Clinton.
Click to expand...
He was a naughty boy but people liked him so it didn't matter.

Monika Lewinski spoke up in favour of Trump recently. Is there a place in the Oval office for her?
Click to expand...

It didn't matter because "being a naughty boy" is merely a matter of opinion.
 
untermensche said:
whichphilosophy said:
He was a naughty boy but people liked him so it didn't matter.

Monika Lewinski spoke up in favour of Trump recently. Is there a place in the Oval office for her?
Click to expand...

It didn't matter because "being a naughty boy" is merely a matter of opinion.
Click to expand...
It's male nature. Risk everything for a quickie. I think his voters agreed on this.
 
FWIW, I know someone who lives quite near campus. According to her, the violence was perpetrated by a small number of anarchists. Most of the demonstrators were quiet and peaceable.

Which brings up the question of just who those violent anarchists were. Lots of reports of small groups of infiltrators in all kinds of protests, whose sole purpose is to try to invite violence and bring disrepute to the cause--whatever the cause. It's an old tactic. I'd expect the news media--and law enforcement to be a bit more hip to that bag of tricks,
 
Nice Squirrel said:
whichphilosophy said:
It's male nature. Risk everything for a quickie. I think his voters agreed on this.
Click to expand...

its not male nature
Click to expand...

The WPs have made comments in the past about how wog science hasn't uncovered any useful knowledge about ourselves. The cult of scientology teaches that we are non-corporeal, god-like beings, that our bodies are just "MEST" and not important, and that you can get another one if the body you're using isn't suitable for carrying out your cult's social dominance activities in this sector of the gaLAXy. This life, all personal things, are almost as unimportant as your body, and less important if you're Sea Org. All major research and literature on human behavior is, to a scientologist, a delusional waste of time.

For most humans, learning something new in behavior sciences like the Milgram experiments, for example, changes how you see authority figures and how you see your own behaviors and beliefs in regard to authority figures. Any one of us could have been the subjects who kept upping the electric shocks, but almost none of us would respond the same way in any new, similar situations after learning the premise of the experiments.

So that research not only taught us something significant and useful about ourselves in general, but it's knowledge that to some extent forces self-reflection in the individuals who learn about it. It's like a tiny drop of enlightenment in the world every time someone learns about the Milgram experiments and who is also not a complete moron incapable of making the connection between the research and their own programmed assumptions and reactions.

That's just one example. Of course you already know all this, but I like posting these comments for anyone else who might be reading. :)
 
Toni said:
FWIW, I know someone who lives quite near campus. According to her, the violence was perpetrated by a small number of anarchists. Most of the demonstrators were quiet and peaceable.

Which brings up the question of just who those violent anarchists were. Lots of reports of small groups of infiltrators in all kinds of protests, whose sole purpose is to try to invite violence and bring disrepute to the cause--whatever the cause. It's an old tactic. I'd expect the news media--and law enforcement to be a bit more hip to that bag of tricks,
Click to expand...

That was also the case in DC during the Women's March. People who live there and see protests all the time said that the march was overwhelmingly peaceful and that a small number of people just ran around trying to fuck everything up.

There is no doubt the neo-Nazi regime would hire people to do just that.
 
Toni said:
FWIW, I know someone who lives quite near campus. According to her, the violence was perpetrated by a small number of anarchists. Most of the demonstrators were quiet and peaceable.
Click to expand...

I heard the same thing and it sounds about right.

Which brings up the question of just who those violent anarchists were. Lots of reports of small groups of infiltrators in all kinds of protests, whose sole purpose is to try to invite violence and bring disrepute to the cause--whatever the cause. It's an old tactic. I'd expect the news media--and law enforcement to be a bit more hip to that bag of tricks,
Click to expand...

Putin put them up to it ?!! Joking aside I think it's probably no more sinister than violent assholes doing what they do.
 
Toni said:
FWIW, I know someone who lives quite near campus. According to her, the violence was perpetrated by a small number of anarchists. Most of the demonstrators were quiet and peaceable.

Which brings up the question of just who those violent anarchists were. Lots of reports of small groups of infiltrators in all kinds of protests, whose sole purpose is to try to invite violence and bring disrepute to the cause--whatever the cause. It's an old tactic. I'd expect the news media--and law enforcement to be a bit more hip to that bag of tricks,
Click to expand...

It's certainly a possibility. Supporters of Milo could have done it themselves. I doubt we could ever be sure either way.
 
Angry Floof said:
Toni said:
FWIW, I know someone who lives quite near campus. According to her, the violence was perpetrated by a small number of anarchists. Most of the demonstrators were quiet and peaceable.

Which brings up the question of just who those violent anarchists were. Lots of reports of small groups of infiltrators in all kinds of protests, whose sole purpose is to try to invite violence and bring disrepute to the cause--whatever the cause. It's an old tactic. I'd expect the news media--and law enforcement to be a bit more hip to that bag of tricks,
Click to expand...

That was also the case in DC during the Women's March. People who live there and see protests all the time said that the march was overwhelmingly peaceful and that a small number of people just ran around trying to fuck everything up.

There is no doubt the neo-Nazi regime would hire people to do just that.
Click to expand...

Most of it wasn't even during the women's march, but the day before.

They're just the usual Black Bloc idiots that show up at nearly every protest in the Berkeley/Oakland area - I've been hearing about them doing things there since the Sean Bell protests back in 2009.

As for Milo - I don't care. He's one of those Gamergate guys that organize mass troll attacks (he got kicked off of Twitter after he sicced his fans on Leslie Jones last year, if anyone recalls that one), who say that they hate being PC, and nobody should have a safe space. So, now that he's taking his little troll-fest to real life (he also outed a trans student at one of his recent speeches), he's discovering that a few thousand people are a lot more intimidating in the physical world than on Twitter.

Good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom