• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Another Trump Rape Surfaces

 
 
 
Don2 (Don1 Revised) said:
We discuss these stats once per year. Been going on for several years now. Each time Derec's claims get debunked. For some reason Loren still supports the debunked claims. Then another year. Round and round we go.
Click to expand...

You are correct that we keep going over these things again and again - usually when an unsubstantiated rape claim appears and the usual suspects rush in to believe the accuser.
Example: Yet another bombastic rape claim bites the dust

u are very much wrong saying that my claims were debunked though.
 
Derec said:
Don2 (Don1 Revised) said:
We discuss these stats once per year. Been going on for several years now. Each time Derec's claims get debunked. For some reason Loren still supports the debunked claims. Then another year. Round and round we go.
Click to expand...

You are correct that we keep going over these things again and again - usually when an unsubstantiated rape claim appears and the usual suspects rush in to believe the accuser.
Example: Yet another bombastic rape claim bites the dust

u are very much wrong saying that my claims were debunked though.
Click to expand...

Nah, I'm with Don here.
 
Toni said:
Derec said:
Don2 (Don1 Revised) said:
We discuss these stats once per year. Been going on for several years now. Each time Derec's claims get debunked. For some reason Loren still supports the debunked claims. Then another year. Round and round we go.
Click to expand...

You are correct that we keep going over these things again and again - usually when an unsubstantiated rape claim appears and the usual suspects rush in to believe the accuser.
Example: Yet another bombastic rape claim bites the dust

u are very much wrong saying that my claims were debunked though.
Click to expand...

Nah, I'm with Don here.
Click to expand...

Everyone is, except for the usual handful, with their zombie misogyny.
 
Arctish said:
Loren Pechtel said:
Toni said:
So you have no evidence or any links demonstrating that your personal definitions are in accordance with FBI standards. Got it.
Click to expand...

You have a very selective interpretation of what the FBI said.

And note that the FBI is going to be a substantial undercount as it's not going to see the cases that are quickly discredited by law enforcement. The very high false report rates include those quickly-discredited cases.
Click to expand...

You're bullshitting, Loren. Just like you did in the thread I linked to, and in the thread that one was linked to.

You haven't the slightest clue about the quality of the data the FBI collected or how it was organized because you never followed the links and read their report. You have no idea how many cases were "quickly discounted by law enforcement" after an initial investigation or how many weren't investigated at all, although one of the quotes I provided upthread would have given you a clue had you bothered to read it.

If you ever get around to actually reading the FBI and Harvard reports, let me know.
Click to expand...

I read the FBI stuff long ago.
 
Derec said:
Don2 (Don1 Revised) said:
We discuss these stats once per year. Been going on for several years now. Each time Derec's claims get debunked. For some reason Loren still supports the debunked claims. Then another year. Round and round we go.
Click to expand...

You are correct that we keep going over these things again and again - usually when an unsubstantiated rape claim appears and the usual suspects rush in to believe the accuser.
Example: Yet another bombastic rape claim bites the dust

u are very much wrong saying that my claims were debunked though.
Click to expand...

What is the point discussing this with you if every time your claim gets debunked you just bring it up in another year?
 
Loren Pechtel said:
Arctish said:
You're bullshitting, Loren. Just like you did in the thread I linked to, and in the thread that one was linked to.

You haven't the slightest clue about the quality of the data the FBI collected or how it was organized because you never followed the links and read their report. You have no idea how many cases were "quickly discounted by law enforcement" after an initial investigation or how many weren't investigated at all, although one of the quotes I provided upthread would have given you a clue had you bothered to read it.

If you ever get around to actually reading the FBI and Harvard reports, let me know.
Click to expand...

I read the FBI stuff long ago.
Click to expand...

Well you must have promptly forgotten it because there's no indication you understood anything about the data, where it came from, or the definitions being used in this or the previous two discussions.

Perhaps it would help if you quoted the part about 'unfounded' claims that you think supports your argument. Then I can show you the little symbol indicating a footnote and the footnote containing the definition being used. Perhaps you read a different footnote, and that's where the confusion is coming from.
 
Trump may soon have to answer rape allegations under oath

(Reuters) - During a December visit to New York City, writer E. Jean Carroll says she went shopping with a fashion consultant to find the “best outfit” for one of the most important days of her life - when she’ll sit face-to-face with the man she accuses of raping her decades ago, former President Donald Trump.

The author and journalist hopes that day will come this year. Her lawyers are seeking to depose Trump in a defamation lawsuit that Carroll filed against the former president in November 2019 after he denied her accusation that he raped her at a Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s. Trump said he never knew Carroll and accused her of lying to sell her new book, adding: “She’s not my type.”

She plans to be there if Trump is deposed.

“I am living for the moment to walk into that room to sit across the table from him,” Carroll told Reuters in an interview. “I think of it everyday.”
Click to expand...
 
ZiprHead said:
Trump may soon have to answer rape allegations under oath

(Reuters) - During a December visit to New York City, writer E. Jean Carroll says she went shopping with a fashion consultant to find the “best outfit” for one of the most important days of her life - when she’ll sit face-to-face with the man she accuses of raping her decades ago, former President Donald Trump.

The author and journalist hopes that day will come this year. Her lawyers are seeking to depose Trump in a defamation lawsuit that Carroll filed against the former president in November 2019 after he denied her accusation that he raped her at a Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s. Trump said he never knew Carroll and accused her of lying to sell her new book, adding: “She’s not my type.”

She plans to be there if Trump is deposed.

“I am living for the moment to walk into that room to sit across the table from him,” Carroll told Reuters in an interview. “I think of it everyday.”
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Supposedly, she still has "The Dress".
What are the chances of getting a DNA test out of him?

It's only fitting that that instead simply being the party of pillage, the GOP should be known as the party of rape and pillage.
 
What are the chances of getting a DNA test out of him?
Click to expand...

Pretty good I think.

Rape investigations and DNA evidence have become far more sophisticated since the 90s. So, any low level employee from the last 20 years, with a personal article carrying Trump's DNA, can deliver evidence. It's not "the good old days", when a sexual miscreant could bank on a "he said, she said" benefit of the doubt.

It's entirely possible that some maid from 10 years ago has a DNA sample worth $100K in the modern media world.

Tom
 
Longstanding accusations from the 2017-21 time frame, but yet-to-be investigated by DOJ:

Accuser #1: forced sodomy with phallic surrogates (cucumber, turkey baster, rolled-up copy of the Washington Spectator); sexual battery, including frottage, toe-sucking, an act of 'heinous licking'; vernacular offenses, including Dirty Sanchez and Tea Bagging; grabbing by the pussy (accuser identified as Lady Justice)

Accuser #2: forced sodomy with Trump-correct phallic surrogates (roll of dimes, baby carrots, frozen asparagus tips); sexual battery, including spreading a Double Quarter Pounder Meal on victim and eating it with 'vuluptuous sound effects', vernacular offenses, including Golden Showers, Showers with Thunder, and Mar-a-Lago Shitstorm; leering while waiting for Cialis to take effect; an act of 'heinous face-sitting'; grabbing by the pussy (accuser identified as Lady Liberty)
 
ideologyhunter said:
Longstanding accusations from the 2017-21 time frame, but yet-to-be investigated by DOJ:

Accuser #1: forced sodomy with phallic surrogates (cucumber, turkey baster, rolled-up copy of the Washington Spectator); sexual battery, including frottage, toe-sucking, an act of 'heinous licking'; vernacular offenses, including Dirty Sanchez and Tea Bagging; grabbing by the pussy (accuser identified as Lady Justice)

Accuser #2: forced sodomy with Trump-correct phallic surrogates (roll of dimes, baby carrots, frozen asparagus tips); sexual battery, including spreading a Double Quarter Pounder Meal on victim and eating it with 'vuluptuous sound effects', vernacular offenses, including Golden Showers, Showers with Thunder, and Mar-a-Lago Shitstorm; leering while waiting for Cialis to take effect; an act of 'heinous face-sitting'; grabbing by the pussy (accuser identified as Lady Liberty)
Click to expand...

As much as I'd like to see Trump's misdeeds brought out into the light,

What I'm seeing here(in this post) are a bunch of emotive allegations brought by anonymous sources.

I don't see them as much different from the allegations that the Clintons were running a sex slavery ring out of a suburban pizzeria.
Tom
 
TomC said:
ideologyhunter said:
Longstanding accusations from the 2017-21 time frame, but yet-to-be investigated by DOJ:

Accuser #1: forced sodomy with phallic surrogates (cucumber, turkey baster, rolled-up copy of the Washington Spectator); sexual battery, including frottage, toe-sucking, an act of 'heinous licking'; vernacular offenses, including Dirty Sanchez and Tea Bagging; grabbing by the pussy (accuser identified as Lady Justice)

Accuser #2: forced sodomy with Trump-correct phallic surrogates (roll of dimes, baby carrots, frozen asparagus tips); sexual battery, including spreading a Double Quarter Pounder Meal on victim and eating it with 'vuluptuous sound effects', vernacular offenses, including Golden Showers, Showers with Thunder, and Mar-a-Lago Shitstorm; leering while waiting for Cialis to take effect; an act of 'heinous face-sitting'; grabbing by the pussy (accuser identified as Lady Liberty)
Click to expand...

As much as I'd like to see Trump's misdeeds brought out into the light,

What I'm seeing here(in this post) are a bunch of emotive allegations brought by anonymous sources.

I don't see them as much different from the allegations that the Clintons were running a sex slavery ring out of a suburban pizzeria.
Tom
Click to expand...
Did the Clintons ever brag about "grabbin' 'em by the pussy", or did they brag about walking into changing rooms at beauty pageants?
 
Worldtraveller said:
TomC said:
ideologyhunter said:
Longstanding accusations from the 2017-21 time frame, but yet-to-be investigated by DOJ:

Accuser #1: forced sodomy with phallic surrogates (cucumber, turkey baster, rolled-up copy of the Washington Spectator); sexual battery, including frottage, toe-sucking, an act of 'heinous licking'; vernacular offenses, including Dirty Sanchez and Tea Bagging; grabbing by the pussy (accuser identified as Lady Justice)

Accuser #2: forced sodomy with Trump-correct phallic surrogates (roll of dimes, baby carrots, frozen asparagus tips); sexual battery, including spreading a Double Quarter Pounder Meal on victim and eating it with 'vuluptuous sound effects', vernacular offenses, including Golden Showers, Showers with Thunder, and Mar-a-Lago Shitstorm; leering while waiting for Cialis to take effect; an act of 'heinous face-sitting'; grabbing by the pussy (accuser identified as Lady Liberty)
Click to expand...

As much as I'd like to see Trump's misdeeds brought out into the light,

What I'm seeing here(in this post) are a bunch of emotive allegations brought by anonymous sources.

I don't see them as much different from the allegations that the Clintons were running a sex slavery ring out of a suburban pizzeria.
Tom
Click to expand...
Did the Clintons ever brag about "grabbin' 'em by the pussy", or did they brag about walking into changing rooms at beauty pageants?
Click to expand...

Is that in any way relevant to my post?
To me it isn't. People can make any kind of unsubstantiated claims they want. That's what I'm talking about.
Tom
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom