That's the thing. I'm a fucking shitheel when it comes to universes I create, half the time. And I acknowledge that something akin to a universe is possible without a shitheel like me doing it, with a shitheel that is "blind, random absurd circumstances of an infinite normal field".
As a final note, you are just a character in a fictional story trying to explain your existence.i think therefore I am.
Nope. The rest mas energy, the binding energy stored in the atom, is proportional to C and mass. You are putting the cart before the horse. Or the tail is wagging the dog.E=mc2My point is there is nothing realy new in what you say. You've added modern science to it without ubdestanding terms like energy. That combo is not new.Vedas are just the expression of our concepts of psychology religion philosophy.. all the different aspects of the experience of our existence.
That sounds very Hindu to me. Nothing new. Around 2500-3000 year old philosophy. Try reading Vedic writings it may calm you down.
They became popular in the 60s-70s with young people who rejected mainstream western-American culture.
Vedas - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Bhagavad Gita - Wikipedia
It’s is sad that we kill in the name of Jesus .. we call those who disagree with our opinion of what’s right satanic or evil. The rapture is coming when we will finally understand the golden rule which just says.. stop being selfish and look at things from the other points of view… LOVE YOUR ENEMIES…they have been raised under different circumstances and understanding.. but we can communicate and cooperate and concede to come to a mutually beneficial solution to our differences.
I call that New Age Mysticism.
A modern expert is Deepak Chopra. I have watched him on PBS. He is a degreed MD. He expertly weaves traditional Indian philosophy and mysticism with modern physics. Consiounesss explained as some etherall mix of the mystical and quantum mechanics. The audience is enthralled. In the 90s he claimed an earthquake was caused accidentally by his mediataing.
The difference between you and Chopra is that he actually knows science. You can learn what polished gobbledygook looks like by watching his videos. You are an amateur in comparison.
If you are going to publish you have a lot of conpetition for the New AGE market. Authors with academic credentials. Take a look at the Coast To Coast AM web site.
Mass is just the relationship between light and velocity… it’s not a physical thing…. Atoms protons leptons subatomic particles ARE NOT PHYSICAL.. they are a perception of electromagnetic forces. Vibrating energy angstroms decibels firing synapses.. vibrating energy perceived and labelled as mass that they are not….
Mass is a unit of measure or a dimension like meters and liters used to describe reality.
The number 2 is an abstraction with no physical reality. If I have some objects I can say I have two objects. Same with mass. I can't
get a box of kilograms but I can get a box containing 1 kilogram of potatoes.
You are mixing mysticism with simple ordinary weights and measures. The units of kilogram, meters, and seconds are te odern sytem ipof weights and measures. All civilizations had them. Time, distance, and mass/weight.
If you ar not quantifying what you are saying using established variables and units then you are doing metaohyscs and philophy or relgion. You are not talking science.
If aiss does not exist as a property of reality how do you calculate energy of a falling object vs rime? High school physics.
What conservation of energy means is this.
Fire a bullet from a gun. The total energy in Joils of te gunpowder = kniyec energy imparted to the bullet plus the heat henerated plus the mechanical losses in the gun frictions. COE says it must always add up. In any process starting energy must equall the sum of all the enrgies in the process.
It cane about with 19th century experiments with steam engines. It is not some philosophical abstraction.
You say science is all wrong but you invove comservation of energy, a foundation of science. That is called a cognitive dissonance.
As a final note, you are just a character in a fictional story trying to explain your existence.i think therefore I am.
No, I will not knock it off.
It's becoming increasingly apparent that you don't know the meaning of the word "physical".
If that were true, I sincerely doubt that I would have bothered to introduce a character as pointless and tedious as you.
As it is, any god I would be down with hanging out with would be hard to hang out with as god because they prefer a world of strong agnostic atheists who just try to be good because it's the best thing to do for everyone, god or no god, and the only way they get that is if they were to keep their head down.
Oh, hell. Write that sucker. Maybe the rejection letters will give you a little humility... or you would likely see the editorial rejections as proof of how much more brilliant you are than the publishers. But I would recommend that you first buy a good dictionary and learn the meanings of the words you have been using. Then maybe take some physics courses.
I have a far different perception of god. I see god as a singularity that experiences the lives of every consciousness.
If you read or were able to understand my messages you would know that my understanding of our existence as a consciousness does not allow for “particles “ quantum or otherwise… but I guess since people like you still can’t even read let alone understand what a concept is. And you suggest that I buy a good dictionary??? Guffaw.. I do not need physic courses because there is no physical reality to subatomic electromagnetic energy waves or “consciousness”
I can say categorically that this is NOT necessarily true in any way.
No problem. Think of yourself as the creator of an imaginary universe. Not only do you experience everything in your universe you create everything in your universe. Consider the implications of that.
Oh wait I see the miscommunication as usual you like most the world look at us as a CREATION OF the universe… instead of seeing the universe as a CREATION of our consciousness.. I think therefore I am.. not I am therefore I think…
Actually I have no need to explain my existence.Nope. The rest mas energy, the binding energy stored in the atom, is proportional to C and mass. You are putting the cart before the horse. Or the tail is wagging the dog.E=mc2My point is there is nothing realy new in what you say. You've added modern science to it without ubdestanding terms like energy. That combo is not new.Vedas are just the expression of our concepts of psychology religion philosophy.. all the different aspects of the experience of our existence.
That sounds very Hindu to me. Nothing new. Around 2500-3000 year old philosophy. Try reading Vedic writings it may calm you down.
They became popular in the 60s-70s with young people who rejected mainstream western-American culture.
Vedas - Wikipedia
Bhagavad Gita - Wikipedia
It’s is sad that we kill in the name of Jesus .. we call those who disagree with our opinion of what’s right satanic or evil. The rapture is coming when we will finally understand the golden rule which just says.. stop being selfish and look at things from the other points of view… LOVE YOUR ENEMIES…they have been raised under different circumstances and understanding.. but we can communicate and cooperate and concede to come to a mutually beneficial solution to our differences.
I call that New Age Mysticism.
A modern expert is Deepak Chopra. I have watched him on PBS. He is a degreed MD. He expertly weaves traditional Indian philosophy and mysticism with modern physics. Consiounesss explained as some etherall mix of the mystical and quantum mechanics. The audience is enthralled. In the 90s he claimed an earthquake was caused accidentally by his mediataing.
The difference between you and Chopra is that he actually knows science. You can learn what polished gobbledygook looks like by watching his videos. You are an amateur in comparison.
If you are going to publish you have a lot of conpetition for the New AGE market. Authors with academic credentials. Take a look at the Coast To Coast AM web site.
Mass is just the relationship between light and velocity… it’s not a physical thing…. Atoms protons leptons subatomic particles ARE NOT PHYSICAL.. they are a perception of electromagnetic forces. Vibrating energy angstroms decibels firing synapses.. vibrating energy perceived and labelled as mass that they are not….
Mass is a unit of measure or a dimension like meters and liters used to describe reality.
The number 2 is an abstraction with no physical reality. If I have some objects I can say I have two objects. Same with mass. I can't
get a box of kilograms but I can get a box containing 1 kilogram of potatoes.
You are mixing mysticism with simple ordinary weights and measures. The units of kilogram, meters, and seconds are te odern sytem ipof weights and measures. All civilizations had them. Time, distance, and mass/weight.
If you ar not quantifying what you are saying using established variables and units then you are doing metaohyscs and philophy or relgion. You are not talking science.
If aiss does not exist as a property of reality how do you calculate energy of a falling object vs rime? High school physics.
What conservation of energy means is this.
Fire a bullet from a gun. The total energy in Joils of te gunpowder = kniyec energy imparted to the bullet plus the heat henerated plus the mechanical losses in the gun frictions. COE says it must always add up. In any process starting energy must equall the sum of all the enrgies in the process.
It cane about with 19th century experiments with steam engines. It is not some philosophical abstraction.
You say science is all wrong but you invove comservation of energy, a foundation of science. That is called a cognitive dissonance.As a final note, you are just a character in a fictional story trying to explain your existence.i think therefore I am.
But that realization simply caused a BIG BANG explosion of unanswerable questions..
What am I? Where how when why?
Our existence began as an attempt to answer those questions.
Realizing there were no answers, we created answers to give our existence a purpose and meaning. To make our boring lonely existence as a singularity a more enjoyable experience.
Since only our consciousness existed we had to use it to create this universe.
(1) I exist in a universe of
(0) nothingness
100111000111 that’s all I needed to create this universe as a perception of vibrating energy
Color’s angstroms vibrating energy
Sounds decibels vibrating energy
Thoughts firing synapses vibrating energy
I think therefore I am.. everything else is a creation and communication of my conscious singularity vibrating.. 100111000111
If you can’t “get it” from that explanation you simply are not ready … You can’t handle the truth……yet….
It is "that is, therefore that thinks". And that says "that is, therefore that thinks" in relation to me. And then I can look at myself, even and say "that which is me is, therefore that which is me thinks".
Well, I study these things because I want to create more interesting games, and also create other interesting nonhuman things, perhaps people, that play games and perhaps to play games with us!
To me video games and virtual reality are the same forms of escape as religion. The Matrix in some form is already developing. Peole growing up in it will be unable to distinguish reality from illusion.
