• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

What are the differences in fiscal policy between replublicans and democrats?

Also this.

R's: I'm going to take as much as I can for me and my family

D's: I'm going to attempt to not be an asshole to people outside of my family

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katie...es-to-oppose-voter-identifation-laws-n1811436

Pennsylvania Democrats have been caught red handed allegedly accepting bribes in return for their opposition to voter identification law in the Keystone State.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/27/4...ted-or-raided-by-the-fbi-in-quick-succession/

Three Democratic lawmakers were either arrested or had their office raided Wednesday by the FBI.

Two of the Democrats, including Charlotte, N.C. Mayor Patrick Cannon, were charged in connection with FBI stings that caught them allegedly taking bribes from undercover agents...

https://hotair.com/archives/2015/06...-party-is-caught-up-in-major-bribery-scandal/

In a plea agreement that was unsealed today (PDF), a former chief executive officer of red-light camera company Redflex has pleaded guilty to bribing Columbus and Cincinnati elected officials. Karen Finley, the former CEO, was pressed by Democratic officials in both cities to make campaign contributions in exchange for giving Redflex the contract to install and maintain red-light cameras in the cities.



https://worldpoliticus.com/2017/09/...-cash-donations-senator-convicted-corruption/

There have been reports that a number of Democratic Senators have now been found to have received campaign donations from a man that is currently on trial for corruption charges. This proves that the democrats are the truly fraudulent party as they are the ones that are in this deep.
Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez (N.J.) is facing 12 charges of corruption. These allegations include bribery charges.

Apparently many Democrats went a little further than just avoiding being assholes to people outside their families.
 
The republicans sell policy to corporations and rich people, the democrats don't do that.
Uhm, I'd say that the Dums also sell policy to corporations and WS...they just are more fussy about it, and not so obscene about it.

<random anecdotal events>

Apparently many Democrats went a little further than just avoiding being assholes to people outside their families.
Nothing like picking a few anecdotal events to paint with a yuuge brush. That must make Repugs pussy grabbing sexual predators...

Guard your cute teenage daughters carefully, cuz the Repugs are on the cruz...and feeling emboldened.
 
Nothing like picking a few anecdotal events to paint with a yuuge brush. That must make Repugs pussy grabbing sexual predators...

Brush not yuuge enough! "That makes politicians pussy grabbing sexual predators..."
FIFY :D
 
Republicans want to privatize everything and ensure that capitalism in the US is replaced with feudalism. They want to bankrupt the government and put businesses in charge of the US.

Democrats are generally beholden to corporate interests, though occasionally change something that benefits the common man. They like the existing power structure and safety nets.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
4) Are democrats typical more interested in economic equality? 5) If yes, is this a necessary intrinsic "left" element to keep there from being a present day French-type revolution?

I bring up the French Revolution because the king's councel to his left seemed to be in a little more support for equality after the revolution. 6) Was this left counsel installed mostly due to a lesson learnt from the revolution?

The French revolution was practically a copy of the American experiment, and was a total fiasco when it ended with an emperor: Napoleon.
The American experiment was about making the redcoats sail back to England. The French revolution was about cutting off the head of anybody the Committee of Public Safety defined as an enemy of the people -- and that was long before Napoleon took control. In what way do you see the one revolution as a copy of the other?

The problem with Democrats is that behind the outside cover of their package, they always include programs which are against nature, like abortion, homosexuality, the novelty called "transgender", etc.
Nature is overrated; besides which, everything the Republicans do is against nature too. When humans don't go against nature we live by hunting and gathering, and if there are more than 3 million people in America the extras starve.

On the other hand, Republicans conserve the original idealism found since the creation of the Roman Republic.
The original idealism of Republicans was to abolish slavery. The original idealism of the creation of the Roman Republic was to ensure that wives of slave-owning noblemen would never again be raped by horny sons of above-the-law kings. In what way do you see the one conserving the idealism of the other?
 
The American experiment was about making the redcoats sail back to England. The French revolution was about cutting off the head of anybody the Committee of Public Safety defined as an enemy of the people -- and that was long before Napoleon took control. In what way do you see the one revolution as a copy of the other?

And note that a drive-the-colonial-power-out revolution tends to be a lot less bloody than an overthrow-the-government revolution. In the former you merely need to convince them it's not worthwhile. In the latter they will generally fight until the troops revolt.
 
You read Plutarch and governments greater in justice than democracy at work are found in his writings.

The world history was ruled by empires and kingdoms.

Noble people have roots with sanguinary ancestors who imposed their will over the rest until became authority, and once established their families became the successors.

Other rich families tried to take part of the cake, here is when in Rome the Republic was created. Rich dudes electing their leader. In Rome, the poor and slave didn't vote for a leader, only the rich and powerful had the privilege. Later, other men were included, representing the masses. However, regular people had no access to elect them.

The American revolution, when the Independence was declared, when the Constitution was written, the same, only the rich were able to elect the presidents. It was later when other men could vote but no women were accepted for electing leaders and authorities. Years later women had the right to vote.

However, the rich have had always control of politics. No matter if the government in the US is under Republicans or Democrats, the rich and powerful will take their slice of the cake anyway.

Just look Mr. Obama's administration. It practically gave money straight to the hands of rich people, with the so called "incentives" to the private sector to improve the economy.

Rich people sucks money like crazy from the government, and this won't change.

You are dreaming if you think that Democrats care for you. Just check what Mr. Obama did for black people: nothing. Look what Mr. Obama did for other peoples: Nothing. Look what Mr. Obama did for college and university students: a lot, because he wanted their votes. But Mr. Obama did nothing for elementary, middle and high school students simply because they don't vote.

The national debt with Mr. Obama increased like the belly of a pregnant woman after the fifth month. He gave to the rich more than any other president in the US history, and you protest because president Trump is doing the same.

Look, all the presidents have been servants of the rich, because the rich are the owners, the debt is what make all politicians slaves of rich people. The trap is the debt, and politicians can't go against rich people. Period.

In front of you, they play they are on your side, but under the table they just submit themselves to the rich.

This is what is happening with all democratic governments: politicians work for the rich and for themselves.

Conservatives want to maintain some decency in society.

On the other hand, liberals want chaos in society.

This is an example of the difference: Going against abortion is an action corroborated by nature. Nature didn't support abortion. You don't see other species causing abortions in purpose. Then, liberals are dead wrong with their defense and promotion of abortion.

See it?

The French revolution was to take the king to be replaced by rich people in power, until Napoleon came and create the empire. Such is a historical joke, if you don't see it that way, then how do you explain it? France ended worst because to have the empire required of sending men to be killed in action, to increase their national debt... hmmm... it sounds like our current America...

My position is at least to preserve decency in our society, because the economy -even if fake- provides wealth to the ones who find the way to reach up. Then, politics is sold to the rich, economy is shared to everybody in the US, the social part is the trouble, because Liberals are messing it up.
 
Conservatives want to maintain some decency in society.

On the other hand, liberals want chaos in society.

This is an example of the difference: Going against abortion is an action corroborated by nature. Nature didn't support abortion. You don't see other species causing abortions in purpose. Then, liberals are dead wrong with their defense and promotion of abortion.

See it?

The French revolution was to take the king to be replaced by rich people in power, until Napoleon came and create the empire. Such is a historical joke, if you don't see it that way, then how do you explain it? France ended worst because to have the empire required of sending men to be killed in action, to increase their national debt... hmmm... it sounds like our current America...

My position is at least to preserve decency in our society, because the economy -even if fake- provides wealth to the ones who find the way to reach up. Then, politics is sold to the rich, economy is shared to everybody in the US, the social part is the trouble, because Liberals are messing it up.

The problem is that you are assuming that the past is decency.

Just because something was done historically doesn't make it right.

To a large degree the conservatives want to maintain the society that favors them over others. Liberals want equality.
 
Conservatives want to maintain some decency in society.

On the other hand, liberals want chaos in society.

This is an example of the difference: Going against abortion is an action corroborated by nature. Nature didn't support abortion. You don't see other species causing abortions in purpose. Then, liberals are dead wrong with their defense and promotion of abortion.

See it?

The French revolution was to take the king to be replaced by rich people in power, until Napoleon came and create the empire. Such is a historical joke, if you don't see it that way, then how do you explain it? France ended worst because to have the empire required of sending men to be killed in action, to increase their national debt... hmmm... it sounds like our current America...

My position is at least to preserve decency in our society, because the economy -even if fake- provides wealth to the ones who find the way to reach up. Then, politics is sold to the rich, economy is shared to everybody in the US, the social part is the trouble, because Liberals are messing it up.

The problem is that you are assuming that the past is decency.

Just because something was done historically doesn't make it right.

To a large degree the conservatives want to maintain the society that favors them over others. Liberals want equality.
Conservative wish to be the chief benefactors of their selfishness.

Liberals are asking if it's possible that we can all be selfish together.
 
Republicans - Accept Supply Side economics
Democrats - Do not accept Supply Side economics
Republicans - Want small government
Democrats - Want adequate sized Government
Republicans - Wreck economies
Democrats - Try to fix economies the Republicans have wrecked.
Republicans - Cut taxes to levels that cause problems for good government
Democrats - Oppose tax cuts that will cause problems for future good government
 
Republicans - Accept Supply Side economics
Democrats - Do not accept Supply Side economics
Republicans - Want small government
Democrats - Want adequate sized Government
Republicans - Wreck economies
Democrats - Try to fix economies the Republicans have wrecked.
Republicans - Cut taxes to levels that cause problems for good government
Democrats - Oppose tax cuts that will cause problems for future good government

Sung to the tune of My Dick by Mickey Avalon
 
Back
Top Bottom