• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

So another "chemical" attack in Syria?

Yes, these were Syrian jets, but "bombs" did not contain chemical weapons, it was an ordinary bomb raid.
Hmm... you wouldn't happen to have evidence of that? Because the people dying and being treated for chemical weapon exposure (chlorine and sarin) is evidence in contrary to your unbased statement.
Evidence of what? That it were ordinary bombs?
Suggesting ISIS has access to Sarin gas would be of extraordinary importance and require immediate actions to absolutely quell that, but I don't hear Syria and Russia suggesting any such immediate action. So that pretty much means someone with jets dropped chemical weapons on a rebel held area in Syria. Turkey and the US are unlikely, Russia denies having a jet in the area. That leaves Syria.
Some of the rebels say it were russian planes with definitely russian chemical weapons. So basically these people believe that Putin gased them.
Seeing we aren't basing the Syrian origin on testimony from the Rebels, this is a red herring.

No, it is not, it is an evidence that some (at least) of the rebels distribute lies.
My theory is that, SA or Qatari intelligence is responsible for this attack. Someone waited for the air raid and then released the gas.
 
Yes, these were Syrian jets, but "bombs" did not contain chemical weapons, it was an ordinary bomb raid.

What happened to "I skipped because there were no definite proof of it."
Such a hypocrite.
You need to FAIL better, troll.
 
What happened to "I skipped because there were no definite proof of it."
Such a hypocrite.
You need to FAIL better, troll.

You need to be less stupid.

Oh wow. What a rejoinder.
Your blatant hypocrisy remains. Why not skip all your assertions for which there is no definite proof?
Because you hypocritical trolls have no consistency.
 
Let me repeat undeniable and known facts
1. Assad is winning and not stupid (not super smart though)
2. Trump is stupid
3. Saudis&Co just hate Assad.
4. Saudis had enough chutzpah and disconnection to reality to try to bribe Putin into selling Assad out.

Combine 2,3 and 4 and think.
 
Let me repeat undeniable and known facts
1. Assad is winning and not stupid (not super smart though)
2. Trump is stupid
3. Saudis&Co just hate Assad.
4. Saudis had enough chutzpah and disconnection to reality to try to bribe Putin into selling Assad out.

Combine 2,3 and 4 and think.

You forgot: "Putin is corrupt and cunning, and has no regard for the value of human life."
And: "Barbos is hypocritical Putin apologist"
 
Yes, these were Syrian jets, but "bombs" did not contain chemical weapons, it was an ordinary bomb raid.

What happened to "I skipped because there were no definite proof of it."
Such a hypocrite.
You need to FAIL better, troll.

Not only is accusing someone of being a troll ostensibly against the rules, it is also extremely unclassy. Despite what you may think, not everyone who disagrees with you is automatically a troll. You may use the internet to only hear the opinions you already hold echoed back at you, but I like internet forums, especially this forum, precisely because it is a place where I can hear other perspectives.
 
Let me repeat undeniable and known facts
1. Assad is winning and not stupid (not super smart though)
2. Trump is stupid
3. Saudis&Co just hate Assad.
4. Saudis had enough chutzpah and disconnection to reality to try to bribe Putin into selling Assad out.

Combine 2,3 and 4 and think.

You forgot: "Putin is corrupt and cunning, and has no regard for the value of human life."
And: "Barbos is hypocritical Putin apologist"

Neither Putin nor Assad are in to wanton murder. They are Bad Hombres, for sure, but both of them are fundamentally rational: they kill for a *reason*, not just to get their jollies. One can only speculate, but it is certainly undeniable that using chemical weapons is not in Assad's interest, especially when he has been perfectly free to simply use artillery and bombs indiscriminately, which achieve the same effect.

And, I've got to say, calling Barbos hypocritical in a thread where a bunch of Americans are decrying the use of chemical weapons is extremely... hypocritical.
 
Obama called in the strike and personally delivered the chemical munitions on the back of a big-ass lifted 4X4 painted in Soviet red and yellow. Susan Rice drove the forklift that put the munitions in the building, and Hillary, being the evil genius that she is, attached a bomb with one of those digital countdown timers to the munitions. Then they flew off to CNN's secret hideout in South America to laugh.

Don't believe me? Prove it isn't true.
 
Also few forgotten facts:
1. Previous gas attack happened shortly after Red Line proclamation, someone just could not wait to cross said red line?
2. Obama eventually did not bite.
3. Sunni intelligence boss who was extremely active before the attack fell into oblivion shortly after that for no apparent reasons, coincidence?
 
Let me repeat undeniable and known facts
1. Assad is winning and not stupid (not super smart though)
2. Trump is stupid
3. Saudis&Co just hate Assad.
4. Saudis had enough chutzpah and disconnection to reality to try to bribe Putin into selling Assad out.

Combine 2,3 and 4 and think.

You forgot: "Putin is corrupt and cunning, and has no regard for the value of human life."
And: "Barbos is hypocritical Putin apologist"
I am not a Putin apologist. I am an apologist for a thing called "thinking".
 
Last edited:
You know the one odd thing is how the "terrorists" have all of these WMDs, but aren't using them against Assad forces.

Right. Our Russian troll is reaching again.
Obviously Assad decided to quell a little uprising with his usual tactic, and co-ordinated with the Russians to make sure that as few as possible victims of his war crime received treatment.
But Barbosovich and WP will invent ANY scenario, no matter how far-fetched, to try to paint their murderous uncle as an innocent kitten.

Innocent until proven guilty.
An investigation has not even been started yet.
Nothing far fetched about an evidence based logic vs. the bottom feeders of the press who write half baked reports to sell copy.

Do you agree there should be an impartial investigation?
 
Another Dangerous Rush to Judgment in Syria
With the latest hasty judgment about Tuesday’s poison-gas deaths in a rebel-held area of northern Syria, the mainstream U.S. news media once more reveals itself to be a threat to responsible journalism and to the future of humanity. Again, we see the troubling pattern of verdict first, investigation later, even when that behavior can lead to a dangerous war escalation and many more deaths.


Map of Syria.
Before a careful evaluation of the evidence about Tuesday’s tragedy was possible, The New York Times and other major U.S. news outlets had pinned the blame for the scores of dead on the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad. That revived demands that the U.S. and other nations establish a “no-fly zone” over Syria, which would amount to launching another “regime change” war and would put America into a likely hot war with nuclear-armed Russia.

Even as basic facts were still being assembled about Tuesday’s incident, we, the public, were prepped to disbelieve the Syrian government’s response that the poison gas may have come from rebel stockpiles that could have been released either accidentally or intentionally causing the civilian deaths in a town in Idlib Province.
 
You forgot: "Putin is corrupt and cunning, and has no regard for the value of human life."
And: "Barbos is hypocritical Putin apologist"
I am not a Putin apologist. I am an apologist for a thing called "thinking".

The people that accuse you of those sorts of things tend to be the people who sit comfortable in America cheering on the numerous wars and the slaughter of thousands of innocents by their own government.
Now without any evidence at all they will be cheering on another war.
They naively believe anything their government or press tell them, even if the story later gets changed.

NYT Retreats on 2013 Syria-Sarin Claims
 
Do you agree there should be an impartial investigation?

Yeah, right after the impartial investigation of Trump's pals colluding with Putin's pals...
Anyone who thinks Asshat is not a murdering thug is in denial, or asleep.
 
Do you agree there should be an impartial investigation?

Yeah, right after the impartial investigation of Trump's pals colluding with Putin's pals...
Anyone who thinks Asshat is not a murdering thug is in denial, or asleep.

Do you have any evidence about this latest incident?

We were loudly assured that Assad was behind the 2013 Sarin attack, yet this again proved to be lies.

In the following paper a former UN weapons inspector and a professor of science debunk the American bullshit, that almost started a war


Possible Implications of Faulty US Technical Intelligence in the Damascus Nerve Agent Attack,
 
No matter how many times their government or press lies to them there are always a worrying number of Americans who continue to believe anything they are told, and who can't wait to start another war
 
No matter how many times their government or press lies to them there are always a worrying number of Americans who continue to believe anything they are told, and who can't wait to start another war

Well at least you are finally criticizing Dear Leader.
 
Back
Top Bottom