March for women. A message from Conservatives

[Rhea]

Newsflash: most of the signs and sentiments at the march were NOT for removal or impeachment. It was to advocate that particular issues not be dismissed or catered to a minority. It was to show how many people feel about the executive and legislative actions about particular issues.

It was not to remove by undemocratic processes (even though those non-ballot-box methods are certainly part of our system, just like executive orders are) and it was not to remove by unAmerican processes, either.

Please keep up.

Is there anything specific that you would march for?

Are you for real?

Post 301, 303, asks you why you are making up reasons
307 predicts you
308 tells you why I did not march for hijabs
In 316 you claim, “I would agree with a person's statement why they went and that is up to them.” But then you proceed in eviscerating this promise throughout the rest of the thread.
Post 336 explains how annoying are your repeated assertions that you know why people went to the march
373 talks of my reasons and reminds you, “I don't actually care one iota what you think we "should have" marched about, since you can't even figure out what we _did_ march about. Your kind of thinking is part of the problem.”
374 reminds you that this has been about all women’s rights for a very long time.
379 gives more details to add to those given in 373
380 tries to put it in crayon for you
386 addresses your derail into trade unions where you claim they are who _really_ advocates for women!
394 points out how little you reveal you know of the speeches, and explicitly states how much they meant to me on my march (NOTHING, since again, I didn’t hear them until two weeks later)
400 reminds you _again_ that 5 million people had 5 million reasons to go. And reminds you again that the speeches you keep harping on were not what drove me to go.
409 from LordKiran points out how tedious and transparent is your game of trying to get people to say _your_ answer. Obvious that you are not actually trying to find out why women went, you’re trying to tell them why they went.
419 answers you _again_ why I went, why I went on Jan 21
430 is Ravensky predicting you to a tee.
438 I point out to you _again_ that what you call the meaning of the march turns out to not be true for people at the march. So, you’re wrong. You’re just flat wrong.
448 I remind you that Angela Davis and Hylton and whoever CANNOT be the reasons for the march because of the 5 million people there, NONE of them even knew those people would be there, let alone who they were and what their history is or what they’d say. I CANNOT be true that they were the reason for anyone to go because we decided to go _before_they_did_.


So then in post 451, you lose your memory again and repeat, “Why did you go?”


I roll my eyes. Go re-read the thread. I have no expectation that my telling you a tenth time will obviate the need for an eleventh, so I am moving on without you. So sorry you couldn’t keep up.

I cannot decide if you are deceitful, stupid, deluded or trolling.
I just can't tell why you keep asking me the same question again and again no matter how many times I answer you.

I have no expectation that my telling you a twelfth time will obviate the need for a thirteenth.

 

[blastula]

The evidence includes an admission by the perp himself, which you try to spin as "off color remarks."

Get real, nobody but the delusional takes that shit seriously.

Be specific, this is just a handwave.

The evidence also include the multiple, credible and inter-consistent testimony of the multiple women he attacked.

He made a pass a few women, it's hardly an attack.

Are you really this ignorant of the testimony? Unwanted sexual contact is sexual assault, including grabbing someone on their genitals. If he was just accused of making a pass, he wouldn't have to deny it.

This has been done multiple times in this thread. If you don't consider their concerns legitimate, then that's your failing.

I guess I never got to hear the concerns, all I saw was a foul mouthed tirade from Madonna who grabbed her crotch a bunch of times.

In any event, I did visit their website, it was incoherent rambling about nothing in particular.

Since you are also ignorant about what the marchers have said, your opinion can be rightly dismissed.

 

[Rhea]

Well, pro Life organisations were not permitted to march,

Not true. Anyone was "permitted" to march. A prolife group was not invited to be a _sponsor_.
I saw quite a few pro-lifers marching. They had electric microphones with speakers and six-foot high signs in black about how abortion is murder and we're all going to hell for consorting with teh gays. I saw three of these, each two blocks apart from the other. I'm sure they were on the other side of the mall, too.

that is except one Muslim organisation who of course are anti pro life. Double standards again. I personally think the current laws are sufficient and a woman has a right to choose.

So no double standard, you are just wrong about what went on there.
Again.

Do you not care about that? How very odd.

You can disprove something by refuting it with indefeasible evidence Facts, Incidents, Reasons, Examples, and Statistics

I've just disproved your statement. If you are an honest human, you'll stop repeating the falsehood now.

 

[TSwizzle]

Get real, nobody but the delusional takes that shit seriously.

Be specific, this is just a handwave.

Don't be coy, you know full well.

Are you really this ignorant of the testimony? Grabbing someone on their genitals is sexual assault. If he was just accused of making a pass, he wouldn't have to deny it.

Bullshit, nobody was grabbed by the pussy.

Since you are also ignorant about what the marchers have said, your opinion can be rightly dismissed.

Fine by me.

 

[PyramidHead]

Wtf is 'anti pro life'?!

 

[RavenSky]

that is except one Muslim organisation who of course are anti pro life. Double standards again.

And to refute the other part of your claim, one of the sponsors of the DC march:

Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ

Nope. No "double-standards"

 

[blastula]

Be specific, this is just a handwave.

Don't be coy, you know full well.

Are you really this ignorant of the testimony? Grabbing someone on their genitals is sexual assault. If he was just accused of making a pass, he wouldn't have to deny it.

Bullshit, nobody was grabbed by the pussy.

Since you are also ignorant about what the marchers have said, your opinion can be rightly dismissed.

Fine by me.

More handwaves. If you can support anything you said, then you should do it. It's telling that you don't.

 

[Rhea]

Bullshit, nobody was grabbed by the pussy.

It's fascinating to watch people approve this assault method. To pretend it didn't happen, to pretend it doesn't matter, to pretend it's not a crime.
Fascinating. Ugly.

1 More Woman Accuses Trump Of Inappropriate Sexual Conduct. Here's The Full List

from the article - each bullet a different woman

• and "started putting his hand up [her] skirt."
• He tore off her clothes and unzipped his pants. " 'Then he jams his penis inside her for the first time in more than sixteen months. Ivana is terrified... It is a violent assault,'
• put his hand up her skirt, and "touched her vagina through her underwear,"
• Trump put his hands up her skirt, touching her crotch.
• "This was a pretty good nudge. More of a grab. It was pretty close to the center of my butt. I was startled. I jumped."
• She tried to push him away, and he "began thrusting his genitals."
• "He probably doesn't want me telling the story about that time he continually grabbed my ass and invited me to his hotel room,"

I know you don't care and you think this is all right, but don't lie that it didn't happen.

 

[RavenSky]

Bullshit, nobody was grabbed by the pussy.

It's fascinating to watch people approve this assault method. To pretend it didn't happen, to pretend it doesn't matter, to pretend it's not a crime.
Fascinating. Ugly.

1 More Woman Accuses Trump Of Inappropriate Sexual Conduct. Here's The Full List

And guess who is the first to jeer when anyone comments on 'rape culture'

 

[TSwizzle]

More handwaves.

Not at all.

 

[Rhea]

It's fascinating to watch people approve this assault method. To pretend it didn't happen, to pretend it doesn't matter, to pretend it's not a crime.
Fascinating. Ugly.

1 More Woman Accuses Trump Of Inappropriate Sexual Conduct. Here's The Full List

And guess who is the first to jeer when anyone comments on 'rape culture'

Indeed. They need to just be honest. It absolutely happens and happened. They just don't _care_. Be honest, twizzle.

 

[TSwizzle]

Bullshit, nobody was grabbed by the pussy.

It's fascinating to watch people approve this assault method.

Male bovine excrement.

To pretend it didn't happen, to pretend it doesn't matter, to pretend it's not a crime.
Fascinating. Ugly.

LOL, you're so full of it.

- - - Updated - - -

And guess who is the first to jeer when anyone comments on 'rape culture'

Indeed. They need to just be honest. It absolutely happens and happened. They just don't _care_. Be honest, twizzle.

#Trolling.

 

[blastula]

It's fascinating to watch people approve this assault method. To pretend it didn't happen, to pretend it doesn't matter, to pretend it's not a crime.
Fascinating. Ugly.

1 More Woman Accuses Trump Of Inappropriate Sexual Conduct. Here's The Full List

And guess who is the first to jeer when anyone comments on 'rape culture'

Trump is the living embodiment of rape culture. A great reason to march against him and to get him out of office.

 

[RavenSky]

And guess who is the first to jeer when anyone comments on 'rape culture'

Trump is the living embodiment of rape culture. A great reason to march against him and to get him out of office.

One of so very very many great reasons...

 

[whichphilosophy]

And guess who is the first to jeer when anyone comments on 'rape culture'

Trump is the living embodiment of rape culture. A great reason to march against him and to get him out of office.

As in........ unsubstantiated,,,, false etc.

He got elected and that is what the protest is about. I don't think however democratic system will not be overturned on this occasion.

 

[whichphilosophy]

And guess who is the first to jeer when anyone comments on 'rape culture'

Indeed. They need to just be honest. It absolutely happens and happened. They just don't _care_. Be honest, twizzle.

So no proof is needed, all one has to do is accuse. Welcome to the new USA.

 

[blastula]

Trump is the living embodiment of rape culture. A great reason to march against him and to get him out of office.

As in........ unsubstantiated,,,, false etc.

He got elected and that is what the protest is about. I don't think however democratic system will not be overturned on this occasion.

Is there a word you're having a problem with? Should I translate to Russian?

- - - Updated - - -

Indeed. They need to just be honest. It absolutely happens and happened. They just don't _care_. Be honest, twizzle.

So no proof is needed, all one has to do is accuse. Welcome to the new USA.

There is proof. There are accusations and testimony. Testimony is evidence.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Is there anything specific that you would march for?

Are you for real?

Post 301, 303, asks you why you are making up reasons
307 predicts you
308 tells you why I did not march for hijabs
In 316 you claim, “I would agree with a person's statement why they went and that is up to them.” But then you proceed in eviscerating this promise throughout the rest of the thread.
Post 336 explains how annoying are your repeated assertions that you know why people went to the march
373 talks of my reasons and reminds you, “I don't actually care one iota what you think we "should have" marched about, since you can't even figure out what we _did_ march about. Your kind of thinking is part of the problem.”
374 reminds you that this has been about all women’s rights for a very long time.
379 gives more details to add to those given in 373
380 tries to put it in crayon for you
386 addresses your derail into trade unions where you claim they are who _really_ advocates for women!
394 points out how little you reveal you know of the speeches, and explicitly states how much they meant to me on my march (NOTHING, since again, I didn’t hear them until two weeks later)
400 reminds you _again_ that 5 million people had 5 million reasons to go. And reminds you again that the speeches you keep harping on were not what drove me to go.
409 from LordKiran points out how tedious and transparent is your game of trying to get people to say _your_ answer. Obvious that you are not actually trying to find out why women went, you’re trying to tell them why they went.
419 answers you _again_ why I went, why I went on Jan 21
430 is Ravensky predicting you to a tee.
438 I point out to you _again_ that what you call the meaning of the march turns out to not be true for people at the march. So, you’re wrong. You’re just flat wrong.
448 I remind you that Angela Davis and Hylton and whoever CANNOT be the reasons for the march because of the 5 million people there, NONE of them even knew those people would be there, let alone who they were and what their history is or what they’d say. I CANNOT be true that they were the reason for anyone to go because we decided to go _before_they_did_.


So then in post 451, you lose your memory again and repeat, “Why did you go?”


I roll my eyes. Go re-read the thread. I have no expectation that my telling you a tenth time will obviate the need for an eleventh, so I am moving on without you. So sorry you couldn’t keep up.

I cannot decide if you are deceitful, stupid, deluded or trolling.
I just can't tell why you keep asking me the same question again and again no matter how many times I answer you.

I have no expectation that my telling you a twelfth time will obviate the need for a thirteenth.

You mentioned

Your really can't figure that out from the information available? Really?

Some are policies that the new government (President, House, Senate) have vowed to pursue.
There's a story about a straw and a camel's back.

That could be anything.

I assume on abortion laws which I think should not get changed.
Immigration?
?
?

As it was a global march on world issues did anyone protesting about human rights violations against women in the Middle East?

 

[Rhea]

He got elected and that is what the protest is about.

Just out of curiosity, why do you think you are qualified to state, "what this protest is about"?

Specifically, what makes you think you have an accurate handle on what it was "about" for the 5 million people who participated in it?
You, a person who can't even figure out why _I_ went when I told you, in writing, multiple times?

Why do you think you should be a credible source?

- - - Updated - - -

Are you for real?

Post 301, 303, asks you why you are making up reasons
307 predicts you
308 tells you why I did not march for hijabs
In 316 you claim, “I would agree with a person's statement why they went and that is up to them.” But then you proceed in eviscerating this promise throughout the rest of the thread.
Post 336 explains how annoying are your repeated assertions that you know why people went to the march
373 talks of my reasons and reminds you, “I don't actually care one iota what you think we "should have" marched about, since you can't even figure out what we _did_ march about. Your kind of thinking is part of the problem.”
374 reminds you that this has been about all women’s rights for a very long time.
379 gives more details to add to those given in 373
380 tries to put it in crayon for you
386 addresses your derail into trade unions where you claim they are who _really_ advocates for women!
394 points out how little you reveal you know of the speeches, and explicitly states how much they meant to me on my march (NOTHING, since again, I didn’t hear them until two weeks later)
400 reminds you _again_ that 5 million people had 5 million reasons to go. And reminds you again that the speeches you keep harping on were not what drove me to go.
409 from LordKiran points out how tedious and transparent is your game of trying to get people to say _your_ answer. Obvious that you are not actually trying to find out why women went, you’re trying to tell them why they went.
419 answers you _again_ why I went, why I went on Jan 21
430 is Ravensky predicting you to a tee.
438 I point out to you _again_ that what you call the meaning of the march turns out to not be true for people at the march. So, you’re wrong. You’re just flat wrong.
448 I remind you that Angela Davis and Hylton and whoever CANNOT be the reasons for the march because of the 5 million people there, NONE of them even knew those people would be there, let alone who they were and what their history is or what they’d say. I CANNOT be true that they were the reason for anyone to go because we decided to go _before_they_did_.


So then in post 451, you lose your memory again and repeat, “Why did you go?”


I roll my eyes. Go re-read the thread. I have no expectation that my telling you a tenth time will obviate the need for an eleventh, so I am moving on without you. So sorry you couldn’t keep up.

I cannot decide if you are deceitful, stupid, deluded or trolling.
I just can't tell why you keep asking me the same question again and again no matter how many times I answer you.

I have no expectation that my telling you a twelfth time will obviate the need for a thirteenth.

You mentioned

Your really can't figure that out from the information available? Really?

Some are policies that the new government (President, House, Senate) have vowed to pursue.
There's a story about a straw and a camel's back.

That could be anything.

I assume on abortion laws which I think should not get changed.
Immigration?
?
?

As it was a global march on world issues did anyone protesting about human rights violations against women in the Middle East?

Out of all the things I wrote, that bolded one is the only one that made it through your reading comprehension filter?
Fascinating. No wonder you have no idea.

 

[Shadowy Man]

From: https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/b...orters-really-care-about-middle-eastern-women

But despite the worldwide demonstration of collective resistance to racism, to Islamophobia and to misogyny, some people remained undeterred.

On Twitter, there was an abundance of right-wing men suddenly showing concern for the rights of women in the Middle East.

As well as failing to grasp the concept of mutual exclusivity, they attempted to discredit the massive popularity of what could be an enduring movement at home.