DNC Leaks

[untermensche]

If you can't move forward you at least try not to move backward.

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

 

[fast]

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

Trump will win anyway.

 

[Will Wiley]

I think that it's a pretty big story. Could be the first time that a foreign goverment was caught trying to influence US election. Of course, this probably happens all the time.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...release/ar-BBuL5BK?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

Agreed. If I were Russian, if want a complete idiot for US President too.

I think they just would like someone who tries to restore US/Russian relations. I don't want war. I don't believe Putin wants war. It's clear that the American establishment likes war though.
Someone could get nuked. And it wont be the fuckwit politicians who suffer. It will be you and I and the young men and women put in harms way

Some Russians, including Putin make it very clear that they consider the build up of NATO forces near their border a threat. A threat some of them compare to the threat from the Germans in WW2.
[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/aQm8L8d8uDc[/YOUTUBE]

“The more NATO soldiers in your territory, the faster you are going to die. To the last man. Remove NATO from your territory!”

We need someone to de-escalate this situation. It is becoming serious.

 

[braces_for_impact]

Well, Clinton picked up Schultz quick enough. I guessed she doesn't mind handing Trump taking points. Sheesh. Debbie could blow this whole thing, and the new DNC chair doesn't have any kind of winning record. Fuck.

 

[Will Wiley]

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

You vote for war then.

 

[untermensche]

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

You vote for war then.

It's a vote for war either way.

The US is now at perpetual war.

Who will lead it?

Somebody not that different from Obama?

Or a deranged asshole who thinks he possesses special knowledge?

 

[Harry Bosch]

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

BTW: I think that Obama will go down in history as a great president. He returned the economy to normal, reduced our military footprint in the ME somewhat, started the pivot to Asia, and just brought calmness to the country.

 

[Harry Bosch]

Agreed. If I were Russian, if want a complete idiot for US President too.

I think they just would like someone who tries to restore US/Russian relations. I don't want war. I don't believe Putin wants war. It's clear that the American establishment likes war though.
Someone could get nuked. And it wont be the fuckwit politicians who suffer. It will be you and I and the young men and women put in harms way

Some Russians, including Putin make it very clear that they consider the build up of NATO forces near their border a threat. A threat some of them compare to the threat from the Germans in WW2.
[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/aQm8L8d8uDc[/YOUTUBE]

“The more NATO soldiers in your territory, the faster you are going to die. To the last man. Remove NATO from your territory!”

We need someone to de-escalate this situation. It is becoming serious.

The purpose of the NATO buildup is simply to encourage Russia to not expand where they are not wanted. The eastern European states are sovereign countries that do not want to be gobbled up by mother Russia.

 

[Will Wiley]

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

You vote for war then.

It's a vote for war either way.

What evidence do you have that trump will be a warmonger like recent Presidents. Indications i have seen are he will be the least of the warmongers.

So I'm curious what evidence you rely on?

 

[Will Wiley]

I think they just would like someone who tries to restore US/Russian relations. I don't want war. I don't believe Putin wants war. It's clear that the American establishment likes war though.
Someone could get nuked. And it wont be the fuckwit politicians who suffer. It will be you and I and the young men and women put in harms way

Some Russians, including Putin make it very clear that they consider the build up of NATO forces near their border a threat. A threat some of them compare to the threat from the Germans in WW2.
[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/aQm8L8d8uDc[/YOUTUBE]

“The more NATO soldiers in your territory, the faster you are going to die. To the last man. Remove NATO from your territory!”

We need someone to de-escalate this situation. It is becoming serious.

The purpose of the NATO buildup is simply to encourage Russia to not expand where they are not wanted. The eastern European states are sovereign countries that do not want to be gobbled up by mother Russia.

So if nuclear war breaks out all the imbeciles will say...."D'uh...that wasn't our intention."
Have you got even the foggiest idea, the faintest notion that Russia might not see things that way?

Do you know anything about history?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

You vote for war then.

It's a vote for war either way.

What evidence do you have that trump will be a warmonger like recent Presidents.

Incredible that after W, Obama can be considered a "war monger".

Indications i have seen are he will be the least of the warmongers.

Maybe you haven't noticed, but he has mentioned a lot about ISIS, in fact, that has been generally his only foreign policy plank.

- - - Updated - - -

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

BTW: I think that Obama will go down in history as a great president. He returned the economy to normal, reduced our military footprint in the ME somewhat, started the pivot to Asia, and just brought calmness to the country.

Didnt you hear Trump, we are all going to die!

- - - Updated - - -

Well, Clinton picked up Schultz quick enough. I guessed she doesn't mind handing Trump taking points. Sheesh. Debbie could blow this whole thing, and the new DNC chair doesn't have any kind of winning record. Fuck.

How? The RNC very publicly tried to prevent Trump from winning the nomination, going as far as requiring oaths and pledges of allegiance to the party. Heck, Kasich and Cruz had a temporary pact to fix the results in two primaries!

Meanwhile, the DNC didn't like the idea of a guy who isn't a Democrat being their nominee. OMFG! Alert the presses!

 

[braces_for_impact]

Trump calls for increased Military response after Orlando shooting

Trump wants war declared on ISIS.

But besides these, disallowing Muslims into the country, Killing the family members of suspected terrorists, torture, and other suggestions by Trump aren't going to exactly provoke a peace accord.

 

[untermensche]

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

You vote for war then.

It's a vote for war either way.

What evidence do you have that trump will be a warmonger like recent Presidents. Indications i have seen are he will be the least of the warmongers.

So I'm curious what evidence you rely on?

Who do you think Trump is?

Captain America? He's an old fat man that can barely walk.

And my evidence is the things he has promised. Things like increased action against ISIS.

That is war, not tea parties.

 

[Will Wiley]

Incredible that after W, Obama can be considered a "war monger".

Whether W was a warmonger is irrelevant. Obama clearly is one. That you don't see it shows how desensitised you are. You think it is normal to bomb countries and civilians. Is that something peacemakers do?
What is wrong with you?

Nobel Peace Prize-Winning Obama Has Been At War LONGER THAN ANY OTHER American President

Obama, the Warmonger

 

[untermensche]

Incredible that after W, Obama can be considered a "war monger".

Whether W was a warmonger is irrelevant. Obama clearly is one. That you don't see it shows how desensitised you are. You think it is normal to bomb countries and civilians. Is that something peacemakers do?
What is wrong with you?

Nobel Peace Prize-Winning Obama Has Been At War LONGER THAN ANY OTHER American President

Obama, the Warmonger

What war has Trump promised to end?

 

[Will Wiley]

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

You vote for war then.

It's a vote for war either way.

What evidence do you have that trump will be a warmonger like recent Presidents. Indications i have seen are he will be the least of the warmongers.

So I'm curious what evidence you rely on?

Who do you think Trump is?

Captain America? He's an old fat man that can barely walk.

And my evidence is the things he has promised. Things like increased action against ISIS.

That is war, not tea parties.

I asked you for evidence, and all you have is that he threatened ISIS who first threatened America.
You lose.
You fail. You can't compare that to all recent Presidents.
Trump is awful , but the warmonger you support is worse!

 

[braces_for_impact]

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

You vote for war then.

It's a vote for war either way.

What evidence do you have that trump will be a warmonger like recent Presidents.

Incredible that after W, Obama can be considered a "war monger".

Indications i have seen are he will be the least of the warmongers.

Maybe you haven't noticed, but he has mentioned a lot about ISIS, in fact, that has been generally his only foreign policy plank.

- - - Updated - - -

I think you mean "move backward slower than faster", and that's a matter of opinion in the first place.

You don't vote for some dangerous insane jerk because the only other choice is not much different from Obama.

Is that why you're refusing to vote for Stein?

My vote is a vote AGAINST Trump, a sick monstrosity of a human being, and it is a vote to best defeat Trump.

That means it is a vote for Hillary, who is not a digression from Obama in any significant way.

BTW: I think that Obama will go down in history as a great president. He returned the economy to normal, reduced our military footprint in the ME somewhat, started the pivot to Asia, and just brought calmness to the country.

Didnt you hear Trump, we are all going to die!

- - - Updated - - -

Well, Clinton picked up Schultz quick enough. I guessed she doesn't mind handing Trump taking points. Sheesh. Debbie could blow this whole thing, and the new DNC chair doesn't have any kind of winning record. Fuck.

How? The RNC very publicly tried to prevent Trump from winning the nomination, going as far as requiring oaths and pledges of allegiance to the party. Heck, Kasich and Cruz had a temporary pact to fix the results in two primaries!

Meanwhile, the DNC didn't like the idea of a guy who isn't a Democrat being their nominee. OMFG! Alert the presses!

If I start judging Democrats by the same yardstick I judge Republicans, this will permit the Democrats quite the leeway. I don't let their opposition dictate their ethics. No thanks, I'll judge the democrats on their own merits.

I understand the party exists first and foremost to protect itself. I get that. Then why allow Bernie into the party to run in the first place? The DNC wants the Bernie movement, and the Bernie votes, but they don't want his political revolution. Fine, but you can't have both. Also, The DNC has made of pledge of neutrality, and by their own admission, broken this pledge and apologized to Bernie for it. If the party honestly felt that Bernie being an Independent before this whole thing started was a problem and that they could not maintain neutrality, they should have said as much. The fact that they did this on the down low shows that they knew what they were doing was wrong. There were people that quit various positions to join Bernie's campaign because they couldn't maintain that neutrality. That was the right thing to do.

 

[Will Wiley]

Whether W was a warmonger is irrelevant. Obama clearly is one. That you don't see it shows how desensitised you are. You think it is normal to bomb countries and civilians. Is that something peacemakers do?
What is wrong with you?

Nobel Peace Prize-Winning Obama Has Been At War LONGER THAN ANY OTHER American President

Obama, the Warmonger

What war has Trump promised to end?

As I said, the indications are he will be less of a warmonger.

1. He indicates he will be more isolationist.
2. He wants to restore relations with Russia.
3. He indicates he will not blindly support NATO.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I asked you for evidence, and all you have is that he threatened ISIS who first threatened America.

Well he threatened the families of those who are in ISIS, ISIS, wants to ban immigration from Islamic nations.

In order to fight ISIS, more so that Obama, that may take boots in Syria and Iraq. A battle against ISIS isn't going to work. Been there, done that. Remember Iraq between 2003 and 2006? We had over 100,000 troops in Iraq and they were powerless to cause the defeat of al Qaeda militarily.

Trump is awful , but the warmonger you support is worse!

Haw!

 

[untermensche]

I asked you for evidence, and all you have is that he threatened ISIS who first threatened America.
You lose.
You fail. You can't compare that to all recent Presidents.
Trump is awful , but the warmonger you support is worse!

I lose what?

To convince you?

Who gives a shit?

Trump is a despicable monstrosity of a human being.

Nothing he says can be trusted and most of it is provable lies.

He is by far the worst and most dangerous presidential candidate in 100 years.

The US should be ashamed that some of it's people have nominated him.

The world is laughing at them.