Religion of peace protestors try to burn people to protest what someone else said

[hinduwoman]

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...lda-tense-as-anti-tiwari-rally-turns-violent/



This Tiwari was not even from that area, but some hundreds of miles away.
And then Muslims would get upset when Hindus will say this RSS (Hindu nationalist organization) guys were right after all!

A massive Muslim protest rally against Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha leader Kamlesh Tiwari for his alleged derogatory remarks against Prophet Mohammed turned violent in Malda district on Sunday, leading to arson and gunfire in which two persons reportedly sustained bullet injuries. The protesters set on fire about two dozen vehicles and attacked the Kaliachak Police Station.
The violence broke out when the protesters, who were taking out the rally on National Highway 34, came across a bus that was trying to negotiate past them. A group of protesters got into an argument with the driver of the bus and soon the situation spiralled out of control. As the passengers got off the bus, the protesters burnt it down.
A little later, a BSF vehicle, which was coming from Malda, was also set ablaze. The mob then turned towards the nearby Kaliachak Police Station. Eyewitnesses said the protesters drove out the policemen and set on fire part of the police station, including the barracks.

-

 

[untermensche]

Mob violence.

What does it prove beyond the ape-like character of humans?

 

[Terrell]

#NotAllMuslims

 

[Trausti]

 

[Terrell]

The people who burned that Jordanian pilot alive are responsible for their actions. Muslims, or people in general, who had nothing to do with those actions aren't responsible for burning that pilot alive.

 

[Tom Sawyer]

The people who burned that Jordanian pilot alive are responsible for their actions. Muslims, or people in general, who had nothing to do with those actions aren't responsible for burning that pilot alive.

Right, just like the KKK isn't responsible for lynching anybody. While some individual people who just happened to be KKK members went and personally decided to lynch some coloured folk for reasons that just happened to be the result of following the philosophy of the KKK, those people are the ones responsible. The KKK, or people in general, who had nothing to do with those actions aren't responsible for those people getting lynched.

 

[Terrell]

The people who burned that Jordanian pilot alive are responsible for their actions. Muslims, or people in general, who had nothing to do with those actions aren't responsible for burning that pilot alive.

Right, just like the KKK isn't responsible for lynching anybody. While some individual people who just happened to be KKK members went and personally decided to lynch some coloured folk for reasons that just happened to be the result of following the philosophy of the KKK, those people are the ones responsible. The KKK, or people in general, who had nothing to do with those actions aren't responsible for those people getting lynched.

I can't always tell if you're joking or not. I suspect you are but I'm not sure.

Anyway, to better word what I'm trying to say, just in case you're not joking. IMO the KKK in and of itself is a terrorist organization. I don't see Islam as a terrorist organization in and of itself. If a Muslim doesn't willingly contribute (fund or participate), directly or indirectly to terrorist organizations, I don't think they are responsible for the actions of those who do.

 

[fromderinside]

Whoa doggie. How many flavors of KKK are there versus the number of flavors of Muslims. As I understand it KKK comes in social wanna get along and lets do it flavors. If one is a social get along maybe a pass if one can prove it. There's a great debate among people as to whether terrorist Islamist flavor are Muslims at all.

I claim too broad a brush.

 

[dismal]

Whoa doggie. How many flavors of KKK are there versus the number of flavors of Muslims.

Well, there's the flavor where being a Klan Exalted Cyclops doesn't prevent you being a long term Democrat Senator and third in line to the Presidency.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

Whoa doggie. How many flavors of KKK are there versus the number of flavors of Muslims.

Well, there's the flavor where being a Klan Exalted Cyclops doesn't prevent you being a long term Democrat Senator and third in line to the Presidency.

That was yesterday. Now the dang Democrats are too politically correct.

 

[Cheerful Charlie]

Mob violence.

What does it prove beyond the ape-like character of humans?

Apes don't practice arson though....

 

[Arctish]

Mob violence.

What does it prove beyond the ape-like character of humans?

Apes don't practice arson though....

They would if King Louie had learned the secret of Man's Red Flower from Mowgli.

 

[Warpoet]

I can't always tell if you're joking or not. I suspect you are but I'm not sure.

Anyway, to better word what I'm trying to say, just in case you're not joking. IMO the KKK in and of itself is a terrorist organization. I don't see Islam as a terrorist organization in and of itself. If a Muslim doesn't willingly contribute (fund or participate), directly or indirectly to terrorist organizations, I don't think they are responsible for the actions of those who do.

It's unclear to me as well if it's serious or not. Perhaps he's trying to argue that people of the same ideology as the actual murderers (ISIS and its supporters) bear some responsibility, which is a fair enough of a point. If he's comparing Muslims generally to the KKK, he's talking out of his ass, but I doubt that's what he's doing.

Of course, Trausti is obviously trying to smear Muslims in general, since he and a few others on this board recognize no distinction between ISIS and normal Muslims, and are pretty much guaranteed to be talking out of their asses any time they post in a thread relating to Islam.

 

[untermensche]

Mob violence.

What does it prove beyond the ape-like character of humans?

Apes don't practice arson though....

What apes?

Humans are apes.

 

[hinduwoman]

Mob violence.

What does it prove beyond the ape-like character of humans?

Quiet simply it is the duty of administration to stop such things not ignore it because election season is coming around and party in power is relying on muslim votes delivered en bloc but hiding under the banner of not being cruel towards minorities.

Secondly this is exactly what is fuelling fundamentalist Hindu violence; everytime such behaviour is treated indulgently specially by so called 'seculars' in their desperate attempts not be called Islamaphobes, the more violent Hindu organizations get stronger support among ordinary people. We are a nation that has been divided already on lines of religion --a demand started by muslims -- and so a fear is growing that there will be a second partition.

 

[untermensche]

Mob violence.

What does it prove beyond the ape-like character of humans?

Quiet simply it is the duty of administration to stop such things not ignore it because election season is coming around and party in power is relying on muslim votes delivered en bloc but hiding under the banner of not being cruel towards minorities.

Secondly this is exactly what is fuelling fundamentalist Hindu violence; everytime such behaviour is treated indulgently specially by so called 'seculars' in their desperate attempts not be called Islamaphobes, the more violent Hindu organizations get stronger support among ordinary people. We are a nation that has been divided already on lines of religion --a demand started by muslims -- and so a fear is growing that there will be a second partition.

Nobody says violence should be ignored.

But it is more the nature of humans rather than the nature of what they believe that is the cause of it.