According to some people here the screenshots are just fake and they say abortion isn't that bad anyway. A related thing to a "morbid taste in entertainment" is that for a couple of years I've been working on a game where you have to chop up everything that breathes. I guess you can't find any reference to any of those pictures/videos being fake.
What you demonstrated by posting those pictures without a spoiler cover is that you're a disgusting person with morbid taste in entertainment.
Well I did notice my 8 year old nephew kept on wanting to look at my computer and I kept on having to hide the screenshots. I was sharing the photos in a clinical way focusing on the color of the bodies. I guess you can't find a single reference (compared to the 125 in the wiki) that agrees that they aren't real foetuses so you've got to find some other problem in my posts. Anyway I'll try and remember to use spoiler if I post (fake?) abortion screenshots again.
That's all I am asking.
Yeah, I think I'm done here.
Sorry sometimes I don't think straight. The intention was to compare the skin colour in a clinical way and make it easier to see it - so I was too focused on that than being mindful of whether it was appropriate.
You could have clarified more what you meant like I had to. Sometimes I don't fully get people's points and don't respond to them properly - sometimes repeatedly. I guess my mind is too messed up for you.
It wasn't just me. It was me, and Loren, and Tom, we all described that "fake" meant as much "misrepresented from the original context".
This shows a cartoon of a foetus being pulled into pieces:
I thought footage would be better evidence than stories. I mean people here don't even believe a Professor of Law when she talked about an abortion at 37 weeks. I can find more information about abortion footage but I wasn't able to find evidence that it was faked in the 1980s or 1990s etc.
I said earlier it could be third world footage. I never said any of it was from Western countries. Why does that cartoon showing a pile of body pieces look similar to some of the footage? Either it was a real abortion or they faked it to look like a real abortion? How did they know what the chopped up bits were supposed to look like?
Why would you think that trashy images with no demonstrable context would be better evidence than something like real evidence and statistics and studies and science and stuff?
Because that is how professional Christians and anyone who they have corrupted and anyone else who corrupts as they do encourage people to "reason" for themselves, with images and emotions rather than actual documentation.
In post #361 I referred to statistics from The Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity which a Professor of Law quoted. She seemed to be familiar with the case but was referring to the table as evidence. People here couldn't accept that the 37 week abortion was for "psychosocial indictions only" (like the table says) but somehow was actually for other reasons.
Are you saying that in abortions they NEVER chop up a foetus like that? So they created that cartoon based on something that never happens? BTW in university essays at least there are appeals to authority - you have to provide references. So in the case of abortion they ALWAYS are able to pull out the foetus in one piece? The footage also showed some chopped up foetuses. I guess you're saying it is just a myth that never happens but for some reason it is shown in the cartoon and some of the footage...
Post #361 is actual documentation
I wasn't talking about the already mentioned and discussed video. I mentioned another video from this lady.
What about the cartoon I shared? Do you think that ever happens in abortions?
The footage is what the critics focus on. What other evidence is there? Testimonies of astronauts? Footage of rockets going into the sky? The critics don't find that to be very persuasive.
She is a professor of Law and would be familiar with the idea of "truth". i.e. what's good evidence, etc. In post #518 a former PM also agrees that in NSW "you can have late term abortion right up until your due date" and he would also be an expert in what the law is.
No, it's not. The fact is that "psychosocial" can mean a lot of things, especially in Victoria in 2011. It also doesn't document those images to that event, which is the actual "goalpost" here.
