Republicans embarrass themselves with bias arguments at Google hearings

[Underseer]

https://slate.com/technology/2018/12/google-hearing-sundar-pichai-republicans-conservative-bias.html

Dear conservatives (and libertarians),
Failing to have a pro-right wing bias is not evidence of anti-right wing bias. You lot have been making this argument since Reagan if not sooner, and at no point were these arguments compelling to anyone other than your fellow rightists. You look ridiculous every single time you make one of these arguments.

 

[Never]

I just saw some excerpts from that hearing. They even asked him why their Wikipedia edits were being changed the next day, showing a total lack of understanding of the internet.

 

[ZiprHead]

I just saw some excerpts from that hearing. They even asked him why their Wikipedia edits were being changed the next day, showing a total lack of understanding of the internet.

Yeah, that one was pretty funny. And the doofus that asked about iPhones.

 

[Mumbles]

https://slate.com/technology/2018/12/google-hearing-sundar-pichai-republicans-conservative-bias.html

Dear conservatives (and libertarians),
Failing to have a pro-right wing bias is not evidence of anti-right wing bias. You lot have been making this argument since Reagan if not sooner, and at no point were these arguments compelling to anyone other than your fellow rightists. You look ridiculous every single time you make one of these arguments.

Even stranger, Google does seem to have a right-wing bias. Why would I want to see commentary from some white nationalist site like Breitbart, instead of just watching news clips and judging for myself?

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

 

[lpetrich]

It seems to me that they completely believe in their victimhood, complete with believing that anything that gets in their way can only be persecution of them. Like negative coverage being bias against them.