steve_bank
Diabetic retinopathy and poor eyesight. Typos ...
I am sure boks have been written.
Given the gospels, what kind of personality might we deduce from modern psychology and experience.
I believe it is liey ther was a flesh and blood person, name unknon.
The name Jesus Christ itself is a yag, not an idenity.
I see multiple personalities. The angry manic Jesus upsetting the temple to the pacific passive Sermon on the Mount.
I looked up Aesop's Fabels. Over time a number of stories became called Aesop's Fables even though no direct connection.
I see the gosel Jesus as more of a composite character as the focal point of collections of oral tales.
In modern terms was he delusional? He claimed supernatural powers and being related to a deity.
As such a person he chose to chmnage water to e wine at a wedding. A bit frivolous.
He sad the poor you will always have, but me for a while. A bit self centered and egotistical.
He allegdlty went through torture and crucifixion without resistance. At the end he is said to say why god his father abandoned him at the end.
He complemented eunuchs.
From turn the oter cheek and meek shall inherit the Earth I deduce pacifism. He went to his death willingly.
If yiu are a slave be a good one and a c credit to your master. Not a champion of justice and liberty compared to Gandhi and MLK.
From give to Caesar what is Caesar's and what is god's to god says he was for the Roman-Hebrew status quo not for Hebrew liberation from Roman rule.
Given the gospels, what kind of personality might we deduce from modern psychology and experience.
I believe it is liey ther was a flesh and blood person, name unknon.
The name Jesus Christ itself is a yag, not an idenity.
I see multiple personalities. The angry manic Jesus upsetting the temple to the pacific passive Sermon on the Mount.
I looked up Aesop's Fabels. Over time a number of stories became called Aesop's Fables even though no direct connection.
I see the gosel Jesus as more of a composite character as the focal point of collections of oral tales.
In modern terms was he delusional? He claimed supernatural powers and being related to a deity.
As such a person he chose to chmnage water to e wine at a wedding. A bit frivolous.
He sad the poor you will always have, but me for a while. A bit self centered and egotistical.
He allegdlty went through torture and crucifixion without resistance. At the end he is said to say why god his father abandoned him at the end.
He complemented eunuchs.
From turn the oter cheek and meek shall inherit the Earth I deduce pacifism. He went to his death willingly.
If yiu are a slave be a good one and a c credit to your master. Not a champion of justice and liberty compared to Gandhi and MLK.
From give to Caesar what is Caesar's and what is god's to god says he was for the Roman-Hebrew status quo not for Hebrew liberation from Roman rule.