• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Please educate me about Evangelical Christianity

Tammuz

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
522
Location
Sweden
Basic Beliefs
Scientific skepticism
So I vaguely know that Evangelical Christianity is a Protestant branch of Christianity (which in itself might not say much, Protestantism is huge) that is associated with support for Donald Trump, fervent support for Israel, and strong opposition to abortion. I have also read that it is associated with Christian nationalism in the US, but it might be unfair to generalize it that way.

So please educate me about Evangelical Christianity? What do they believe, and why? What are they like in real life? Why are Evangelical Christians a controversial group? How does Evangelical Christianity compare to other branches of Christianity? Etc.

In the US, Evangelical Christians are a significant demographic group. Over here, they are very much a fringe group in society. So that might why I am not very familiar with them and their beliefs.
 
I can only give you my own experience as a person who was raised by evangelical Christians. My parents became converts to evangelical Christianity when I was about 4. First my mother was suckered in and then she preached constantly to my father until he also adopted the religion. '

I was taught that one must believe that Jesus Christ was the only begotten son of God. He was sent by god to be sacrificed for our sins. ( just another version of the concept of a blood sacrifice imo ). I was told that if I didn't "ask Jesus into my heart to be my personal savior", when I died, I would spend eternity in an after life known as hell. I was taught that in hell, the unsaved ( ie, those who didn't accept Jesus as their savior ) would be tortured for all of eternity. I was heavily indoctrinated during my entire childhood.

I was also taught that I was supposed to "preach the gospel to every living creature". That's the evangelical part. I attended a very large, wealthy church in northern New Jersey as a child. All of the money was spent on foreign missionaries, as this was seen as vitally important to god. I was told to try and convert my Catholic friends or they would go to hell. They probably thought I was nuts, but they had their own crazy beliefs, so we still got along.

I was taught that the KJ version of the Bible was the only true translation, and. that the men who put it together were divinely inspired. I was taught to take everything in that version of the Bible to be literally true. This was in the 50s and 60s, so YECs were common back then. All the crazy stories in the OT were to be taken as absolute truth. That's a simple explanation.

Now, here's my opinion as to how this religion became so influential in American politics. My parents to their credit always believed in the separation of church and state, so they were actually pleased when the Bible reading and prayer were removed from the public schools. That is no longer the case among most evangelicals.

During the 1980s, the Republican Party seemed to realize that they could manipulate evangelicals by promising them certain things. For example, they would appoint very conservative judges, over turn Roe v Wade, etc. My mother never once told me that she was anti abortion, so I'm not sure how she personally felt about it. Both my parents always voted for Democrats so they seemed to see through what the Republican Party was trying to do. In fact, my mother told me she was very upset because some of her church friends told her not to vote for Obama. She knew I am an atheist yet she seemed comfortable venting to me.

As more Americans left religion and became more secular, the evangelicals started freaking out. They blamed every problem in the country on secularization. Imo, this is how Trump got elected. He pretends to be a Christian and promises evangelicals what they want. Of course, anyone with a working brain can easily see that Trump has no moral compass whatsoever and he's just using people to increase the power of the wealthy and corporations.

Of course, if an evangelical replies, he will probably see it very differently. There's a bunch of bullshit about Israel that has to happen before the return of Jesus. These people seriously believe that Jesus will come down out of the clouds and gather up the "saved". That's known as the "rapture". The "unsaved" will go t through what is commonly known as the "great tribulation". But, there are many variations on this, including the post trip rapture, v. the pre trip rapture. It gets really nutty. I'll spare you more details.

As to how I left this religion, I will try and give you a brief summary. I attended an evangelical college for one semester. Ironically, it was just a few miles from Salem, Ma. where the Salem witch trials were held. During my time there, I came to see that the other Christian students weren't any more moral than any of my other friends. It all came to a head when the Bible teacher and some boys on campus believed that a WeeGee board the boys were playing with, was being controlled by Satan. They went to the lake on campus, said a prayer and threw, "the wicked board" into the lake. Yes. I'm serious.

I immediately realized that I had been taught to believe crazy stuff that had no basis in reality. After several years of studying other religions, I eventually became an atheist. I'm sure there are others with similar experiences and there may be some evangelicals here who have a different take than mine. That was one of the things that I noticed when I attended the christian college. Even evangelicals couldn't agree on a lot of things. That's another thing that got me to start thinking more.

Obviously, most evangelicals can be easily manipulated by political promises. It wasn't that way when I was a child. They simply believed that their god would help them and avoided mixing their beliefs with their political views.
 
So I vaguely know that Evangelical Christianity is a Protestant branch of Christianity (which in itself might not say much, Protestantism is huge) that is associated with support for Donald Trump, fervent support for Israel, and strong opposition to abortion. I have also read that it is associated with Christian nationalism in the US, but it might be unfair to generalize it that way.

So please educate me about Evangelical Christianity? What do they believe, and why? What are they like in real life? Why are Evangelical Christians a controversial group? How does Evangelical Christianity compare to other branches of Christianity? Etc.

In the US, Evangelical Christians are a significant demographic group. Over here, they are very much a fringe group in society. So that might why I am not very familiar with them and their beliefs.

The evangelical part, as you probably know, means they focus on evangelizing, or "spreading the gospel." What that actually means is that Christianity in the U.S. is a social dominance cult. They don't actually spread the "personal relationship with Jesus" they claim to have. That's not possible, even if that were a real thing. They spread a group identity and they do it by hijacking people's fears, needs, prejudices, and ignorance.

Like almost all other strains of Christianity, evangelicals pick and choose what bits of the "holy" scripture of the Bible suit them. Their social structure is based on the dominance of white men and the subjugation of women and children. They claim to only answer to magical beings, so they are conveniently unaccountable for the abuses that flourish within their churches.

I could go on, but I think you get the idea. Evangelical Christianity is an authority worshiping, conscienceless, delusional ideological disease that is not conducive to the well being of a tribe of seven billion. The small group environment that allowed for such ideological disease to arise doesn't exist anymore and they have little or no tools or skills to adapt to the actual world we now live in.
 
So I vaguely know that Evangelical Christianity is a Protestant branch of Christianity (which in itself might not say much, Protestantism is huge) that is associated with support for Donald Trump, fervent support for Israel, and strong opposition to abortion. I have also read that it is associated with Christian nationalism in the US, but it might be unfair to generalize it that way.

So please educate me about Evangelical Christianity? What do they believe, and why? What are they like in real life? Why are Evangelical Christians a controversial group? How does Evangelical Christianity compare to other branches of Christianity? Etc.

In the US, Evangelical Christians are a significant demographic group. Over here, they are very much a fringe group in society. So that might why I am not very familiar with them and their beliefs.
It's slightly complicated, in part because "evangelical" is a term that has been claimed by or applied to in any number of different and functionally unconnected groups. "Evangelical" is derived from the Greek term ευαγγελιον, which means "good news" and can function both as a reference to the Gospels as literal books of the Bible, or to the act of "evangelizing", that is, proselytizing the faith. There have been numerous evangelical revivals throughout the history of Christianity from the Protestant Reformation onward. So "Evangelical Christianity" in U.S. political conversations is overtly different from, say, the Evangelische Kirche today dominant in the German cultural sphere. But not actually entirely unrelated, since the history of Protestant evangelical revivals definitely lends structure and weight to contemporary revivals, and they are often consciously on the mind of reformers who choose to use the term. Protestant Christianity in the U.S. specifically has a very boom-and-bust cycle; longish periods of secularization are followed by sudden revivals on a nearly regular generational basis, wherein a new movement of Christians will suddenly flare up and draw enormous crowds to a "new old way" of worship. A further complication with Evangelicalism is that not everyone labeled by this term accepts or encourages that label themselves. While in theory a reference to specific real groups, in practice "evangelical Christian" is also a employed as a popular stereotype, and it can be applied or not applied very indiscriminately.

While the roots go deep even within the US and you could point to a lot of inter-bellum writers and preachers as possible founders, the current Evangelicalism that is a topic of so much conversation usually refers to a swell of Christian conservativism that greatly expanded youth participation in church matters, with a zenith starting in the late 1960's and seeing continuous strong growth pretty much for the entire following decade and some. Evangelical Christianity in this sense was very much a parallel response to the many counter-cultural and social reform movements in the same time period; a strong Nativist push in reaction to a feeling of secular corruption within the church body as a whole. Evangelicals did and still do fall across a wide political spectrum in theory; the original movement spanned the whole distance between hippie-imitating "Jesus freaks" with guitars and celebrity folk singer endorsements, to rigidly conservative, deeply sexist and racist reform groups more akin to Al Qaeda than Haight Street. Over time, the more conservative branches swiftly became more dominant, at least numerically. They embraced the concept of the "Megachurch" in spades, and framed a heavy obligation to evangelize to friends and neighbors as very nearly integral to Christian identity. Today, while there exist relatively liberal and socially conscious Evangelicals, the stereotype of dogged conservativism and anti-intellectualism is generally justified by the numbers. Polls of evangelicals show a consistently socially conservative trend, to the delight of the Republican Party which gladly took advantage of implicit (and later explicit) Evangelical support the older and more politically active their original Baby Boomer seed population got. Most think of the Reagan Era as the time period in which this political alliance began to take unshakeable root. But it is worth remembering that this relationship is not formal, and since there is no central organization to the aging movement, no one who could agree to such an arrangement on behalf of the others. They are also only one half of the wider and even less clearly defined political alliance known as the Christian Right, as this also includes the Mormon churches and conservative Catholic branches despite there being an otherwise mutually contentious relationship between these three groups.

Some general features common to Evangelical Christianity:

- Extreme fidelity to the Bible. Discursively, it is treated as the only legitimate means of learning any knowledge about God. "Bible-believing Church" is a common code phrase marking a congregation. This is, with few exceptions, the Bible in English translation, and pastors and elders are likely considered the only legitimate interpreters of what it all means. Formal academic scholarship on the Bible is specifically targeted by many evangelical leaders as the internal source of the "corruption" the movement rescued the church from, so formal education of any kind is viewed with considerable suspicion, though Evangelical groups do maintain some independent "Bible Schools" of their own that for the most part pass internal muster.

- Decentralized to an extreme degree. Seldom organized above the level of an individual church. While there are confederations of Evangelical churches, they seldom have meaningful governing authority over their constituent churches. Within a church, which could be of almost any size, leadership is almost always by a male lead pastor, who is hired, advised, and disciplined by a council of "Elders", usually founding members of the church from the years of the first wave of expansion. No degree or qualification is necessarily required for any of these roles, though it has become more common over time for pastors at least to have some sort of degree, especially if from one of the aforementioned Bible Schools.

- Theologically conservative, if by conservative you mean conservative Protestant and very heavily reliant on the reform traditions of England and Germany specifically. While few Evangelicals would admit to treating the Roman Catholic Church as any sort of authority (gasp), the declarations of the early church councils like Nicaea tend to be accepted blindly as "traditional Christianity" by Evangelical groups, with contributions of non-Roman orthodoxies such as Greek Orthodoxy treated as specifically unwelcome foreign corruptions. So, for instance, generally Trinitarian and Augustinian concepts like Original Sin and Substitutionary Atonement dominate Evangelical dialogue.

- In popular dialogue, almost indistinguishable from "Fundamentalism"; though the latter is an older and broader term, in the current climate they are frequently used as though they were synonyms, especially by detractors of both.

- It is now growing much faster as a missionary-driven global movement, especially in Latin America, the Pacific Rim, and Latin America, than it is within the US herself.

- Evangelicalism continues to slightly grow domestically, but their demographics trend older by the year, sparking autochthonous concern about whether they will be able to lure in any significant interest in the youth population going forward. In a connected issue, they are facing pastor shortages in many regions.

- Started many trends, such as the popular revival of commercial "Christian Radio" and the "Contemporary Worship" style (usually a codeword for a "praise band" playing electrified 70s music), that not only last to this day but have quite gotten away from the Evangelical base, having been borrowed by many other groups and younger movements such as the Family Radio cult that made considerable headlines a few years back for wrongly predicting the end of the world.

- Severely anti-liturgical, and often anti-sacramental as well aside from the all important institution of Baptism.

- Faith life often begins with a public recitation of a semi-standardized creed called the "Sinner's Prayer".

- Calls for a "personal relationship" with Jesus are commonplace.

- More American atheists are escaped Evangelicals or children thereof than can be said of any other particular denomination..

- Politics: usually red as hell, though at times, Evangelicalism has strained against over-zealous attempts at Republican control, and you see periodic attempts to put "one of our own" in the White House, or Evangelical code words being used to great advantage in same-party races in the Bible Belt. This some-time autonomy utterly collapsed in the Trump era, and he currently employs seemingly unshakable Evangelical support, aside from some rumors that this support has been slipping among middle-aged suburban women of late.

- Economics: strongly supportive of capitalism and corporate personhood, which are both given distinctly Scriptural overtones in popular conversation.

- Crossovers and overlap with other popular American revival movements like Pentecostalism, Baptism or Methodism are commonplace, but again not very formal or safe to assume. On the other hand, relationships with more traditional denominations like Catholicism, Lutheranism, or Presbyterianism tend to be extremely strained at best, aside from mutual cultural borrowings of music, writing, political rhetoric, etc where the more conservative branches of the above groups are concerned. Praise band or no, though, an Evangelical baptism will not necessarily get you invited to the Communion table in a conservative denominational church.

- On the other hand, many of the pastors and writers these days referred to as "Progressive Christians" are of Evangelical descent, and up until about five years ago, it wasn't unusual for Prog-Christians to openly identify as Evangelical still. This trend is starting to look like another victim of the Trump Era, though. Popular progressive author Rachel Held Evans notoriously gave up on the label shortly before her untimely death, and it is becoming less common for new faces in the Progressive scene to openly identify as such, though many are frank about the complicated paradoxical role that Evangelical Christianity had played in their lives prior to defection.​
 
There is an evangelical wing in the RCC.

When we say Evangelial over here it generaly means somewhat independent Chtians with a very conservative interpotretion of the bible and Christianity.

From a passage in the NT they feel tey are mandated by god and Jesus to go out and convert the world.

A few years ago an Evangelical was killed by natives on an island where outsiders were forbidden, trying to bring them to Jesus.

They have been caught smuggling bibles into North Korea. To Evangelicals us atheist are Satan and evil in a very real sense to them. Their preachers are 'fire and brimstone'. They divide the world into them and everybody else.

Heavy into prophesy and end times.


I was once invited to a private metering. Singing, laying of hands for healing, visions and interpretation, spontaneous reading of scriptura with interpretation.
 
was once invited to a private metering. Singing, laying of hands for healing, visions and interpretation, spontaneous reading of scriptura with interpretation.

That isn't common in most sects of evangelical Christianity. I think it's mostly common among Pentacostals. The church I grew up attending wouldn't have approved os these practices. That's how divided Christianity can be. Each sect has its own practices and rituals.

While Charismatic Catholics and Charismatic Jews weren't common or even a thing when I was a child, they are now. Before I retired, a married couple of Charismatic Jews were my patients. They both wore crosses and the Star of David around their necks. These were converts to evangelical Christianity.

My childhood experience left me to believe that evangelicals use strong emotions to convert other people. These emotions are sometimes based on fear, but not always. They are often an attempt to draw people into an in-group that will protect them and make them feel important.

When I was about 7 or 8, Billy Graham was having one of his "Crusades" in New York City. My parents decided to be counselors and they took us to those Crusades nearly every night for the week that he was there. It was an extremely emotional experience to be in that audience as a child. Graham did have a lot of emotional appeal in the way that he preached. What I remember most vividly was that near the end of the sermon, the lights would be turned down low, and the choir would start to softly sing the hymn, "Just as I am". Graham then asked people to "come forward" to be "saved" with the promise of eternal life. Amazingly, people would suddenly leave their seats and walk down the aisle in response to this emotional plea.

Afterwards, they were invited to attend a session in the basement of the building, where the counselors would give them some religious propaganda and talk to them about starting their new lives among the "saved". My parents were two of the many counselors that provided this service. This was in the very early years following their conversion. Happily, they lost some of that initial zealousness as the years went by. They still believed but their activism slowed down.

I will say this. My parents, especially my mother, were very decent people. My father suffered from a mental illness, so I was able to forgive him for some of the cruel things that he did to us when we were children and I don't think he would have been any different with or without the influence of his religious beliefs. He was just very damaged by his genetic inheritance, his upbringing and by the four years he spent in brutal combat during WWII. He couldn't really help who he was.

My mother, on the other hand, always chose the nicer parts of the message of Jesus. She never had any negative feelings toward those who didn't believe like her. And, when it came to things outside of her religious beliefs, she was very open minded and thoughtful. I've never understood how she was drawn into such a narrow minded version of Christianity. I never felt any resentment for the indoctrination that I received. It helped me understand how easily people can be manipulated by fear and emotional appeals.

When I left my beliefs behind, I felt so happy and free of the cognitive dissonance that haunted me during much of my childhood. Perhaps, if I had not been indoctrinated, I might not have ever appreciated the life that I found later. It's easy for me to forgive since I don't think people have much if any control over how they respond to the influences in their lives. That's part of the beauty of realizing that humans are basically products of their environmental and genetic influences. Sometimes new influences can change a person for better or for worse. But, I digress and I'm getting too personal and I really don't like to argue about free will. :D
 
Partly from observation, partly from the literature:
- travel in packs; packs combine to form herds
-slavishly follow herd leaders
-herd 'spooks' easily, at the slightest provocation; stampede en masse and are very hard to turn
-besides normal vocalizations, sometimes raise forelimbs toward sky and emit long, impassioned ululations, the meaning of which is not presently understood
-obsessive parenting to instill herd mentality in offspring; parenting can be harsh, often resulting in maladapted, seemingly poleaxed young
-highly suspicious of, and hostile toward, non-pack members
-do not believe in their own evolution as a species, and will whinny and skirr in a fury at the notion
-more common in southern U.S., although enclaves are found in north and west. Large nesting grounds in Virginia Beach and Colorado Springs
 
When people come to the door trying to sell their superstitions I consider them evangelical without even knowing their actual denomination. They seem to be most interested in prophecy, saving my soul and end times. They're generally very polite, practiced and not pushy. They're looking for vulnerable individuals and if you tell them you're atheist that generally seals the deal. A couple blokes were at the door a couple days ago, I think they target this area because it is economically lower income.

A few of my former workmates belonged to a local evangelical and they seemed normal enough.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Great_Awakening

...
The First Great Awakening (sometimes Great Awakening) or the Evangelical Revival was a series of Christian revivals that swept Britain and its Thirteen Colonies between the 1730s and 1740s. The revival movement permanently affected Protestantism as adherents strove to renew individual piety and religious devotion. The Great Awakening marked the emergence of Anglo-American evangelicalism as a trans-denominational movement within the Protestant churches. In the United States, the term Great Awakening is most often used, while in the United Kingdom, it is referred to as the Evangelical Revival.
Building on the foundations of older traditions—Puritanism, pietism and Presbyterianism—major leaders of the revival such as George Whitefield, John Wesley and Jonathan Edwards articulated a theology of revival and salvation that transcended denominational boundaries and helped create a common evangelical identity.
....

Here are the roots of the Evangelical movement. There were later movements that arose within evangelicalism. Pentecostalism, Fundamentalism, right wing political movements such as Moral Majority.

To understand Evangelicalism in all its various forms, it is useful to understand its history. The sometimes bizarre antics of early America's Great Awakening revivals are echoed in today's sometimes bizarre TV evangelicals.
 
I'm seeing lots of confusion here between Pentecostalism and Evangelicalism. These are different things. Pentecostals are the ones with all the interesting low-key-magickal practices like speaking in tongues, becoming "stricken in the spirit", singing super loudly, and miraculously healing through the laying on of hands. Whole these groups at times might ally or even overlap, most Evangelicals firmly reject Pentecostal practices as extra-Biblical, "ritual", and inappropriately performative. They are similar in their general preference for a literal but heavily interpreted approach to Scripture, and in keeping relatively conservative social views. Indeed more so for Pentecostals, as I'm not aware of much of a significant liberal wing within their number.
 
Wow, thanks for the answers! Lots of stuff to read apparently.
 
I'm seeing lots of confusion here between Pentecostalism and Evangelicalism. These are different things. Pentecostals are the ones with all the interesting low-key-magickal practices like speaking in tongues, becoming "stricken in the spirit", singing super loudly, and miraculously healing through the laying on of hands. Whole these groups at times might ally or even overlap, most Evangelicals firmly reject Pentecostal practices as extra-Biblical, "ritual", and inappropriately performative. They are similar in their general preference for a literal but heavily interpreted approach to Scripture, and in keeping relatively conservative social views. Indeed more so for Pentecostals, as I'm not aware of much of a significant liberal wing within their number.

This is true. The charismatic denoms like Pentecostals are the "holy rollers" who practice ecstatic rituals like speaking in tongues and "slaying in the spirit" where people touch someone while praying and the person experiences ecstatic convulsions. (I grew up in this kind of church.)

Non charismatic evangelicals such as Southern Baptists regard these ecstatic practices as anything from satanic to merely misguided false teachings.
 
I'm seeing lots of confusion here between Pentecostalism and Evangelicalism. These are different things. Pentecostals are the ones with all the interesting low-key-magickal practices like speaking in tongues, becoming "stricken in the spirit", singing super loudly, and miraculously healing through the laying on of hands. Whole these groups at times might ally or even overlap, most Evangelicals firmly reject Pentecostal practices as extra-Biblical, "ritual", and inappropriately performative. They are similar in their general preference for a literal but heavily interpreted approach to Scripture, and in keeping relatively conservative social views. Indeed more so for Pentecostals, as I'm not aware of much of a significant liberal wing within their number.

This is true. The charismatic denoms like Pentecostals are the "holy rollers" who practice ecstatic rituals like speaking in tongues and "slaying in the spirit" where people touch someone while praying and the person experiences ecstatic convulsions. (I grew up in this kind of church.)

Non charismatic evangelicals such as Southern Baptists regard these ecstatic practices as anything from satanic to merely misguided false teachings.
Certainly not the most rational nor analytical behavior.
 
I'm seeing lots of confusion here between Pentecostalism and Evangelicalism. These are different things. Pentecostals are the ones with all the interesting low-key-magickal practices like speaking in tongues, becoming "stricken in the spirit", singing super loudly, and miraculously healing through the laying on of hands. Whole these groups at times might ally or even overlap, most Evangelicals firmly reject Pentecostal practices as extra-Biblical, "ritual", and inappropriately performative. They are similar in their general preference for a literal but heavily interpreted approach to Scripture, and in keeping relatively conservative social views. Indeed more so for Pentecostals, as I'm not aware of much of a significant liberal wing within their number.

Pentecostalism as we know it is a new religious movement that is actually fairly recent. It is another offshoot from withing Evangelical Christianity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentecostalism
...
Pentecostalism emerged in the early 20th century among radical adherents of the Holiness movement who were energized by revivalism and expectation for the imminent Second Coming of Christ.[3] Believing that they were living in the end times, they expected God to spiritually renew the Christian Church thereby bringing to pass the restoration of spiritual gifts and the evangelization of the world. In 1900, Charles Parham, an American evangelist and faith healer, began teaching that speaking in tongues was the Bible evidence of Spirit baptism and along with William J. Seymour, a Wesleyan-Holiness preacher, he taught that this was the third work of grace.[4] The three-year-long Azusa Street Revival, founded and led by Seymour in Los Angeles, California, resulted in the spread of Pentecostalism throughout the United States
...

While elements of Pentecostalism have bee around for a long time, that only became an organized movement in the early 20th century. It is about the same age as Fundamentalism as an organized movement. Oh yes, and about the same age as serpent handling churches.
 
As with every self identification label, there is a very wide spectrum of those who choose the label.

Your basic Christian evangelist is one who feels a need to tell others about Christianity, with the hope others will come to believe Jesus is their Savior. Generally, a lot of cultural baggage will come along with this. Evangelical religions are a contrast to those where one is born into the belief system, and later conversion is a fairly rare thing.

Back in the 90s, I had many friends who were in a small evangelical church. The land they owned was too small to build a conventional church, so they held worship services in the chapel of a nearby Episcopal School. They turned their land into a vegetable garden which gave all the produce to a local food bank. Their evangelism was very low key. Members were active in prison ministries, where they conducted religious services for inmates and scheduled visits with inmates who did not get visits from friends or family. This was not taken lightly. The drive to the state prison is 3 hours, one way. Their other projects were sponsoring refugees from Sudan and helping them settle in the area. I can honestly say, I've never met so many kind hearted and generous people in any church.

The church itself was supported mostly by a small group of well off parishioners whose monthly tithes covered the expenses, mainly the salary for the minister and a small staff. Since there was no actual church building, a youth program was not really practical and even the Sudanese families preferred churches which offered Sunday school classes. Eventually those supporting the church went to their reward, whatever it might have been and the church was no longer financially viable.
 
No confusion. Read the NT accounts of early believers. Speaking in tongues.
Holy Rollers'.

Some Christians refuse to see what their faith actually is in practice. Catholics Have Opus Dei. A secretive lay group that practices a mysticism. They wear a bracelet around the thigh ith pointssufficet to create a low feeling of pain and discomfort.

One of the recent popes had an apparatus for self whipping.

Listen to theology that comes out of the mouths of congressional Christians, at times quite bizarre.
 
Just to add a bit of levity to the thread, it was a Pentecostal Christian who told my neighbor that atheists have special powers given to us by Satan. Oh how I wish that was true. :D.

But they are not all that crazy. A former neighbor of mine was an atheist and his Pentecostal Christian mother lived with him for a few years. The two the them used to smoke weed together. She said it was okay because it was natural. She was a lovely woman who cared for frail older adults in their homes. Never judge a human by his or her label.
 
Back
Top Bottom