pood
Contributor
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2021
- Messages
- 8,010
- Basic Beliefs
- agnostic
This thread was inspired by a light derail in the thread about famous classic movies you have never seen.
It involves the movie Close Encounters of the Third Kind, in which string-bean aliens manage to communicate with humans via music. The claim was made that this is because the mathematical structure of music will be intelligible to all technological aliens regardless of their evolutionary background.
These claims are strongly contested here, in chapter five of a book by Norman Swartz, a professor emeritus of philosophy at Simon Fraser University. He argues that it is highly unlikely that intelligent aliens would share our taste or comprehension of music, but even more important, it is quite possible that maths are not universal and that their maths and ours might be utterly incomprehensible to each other. He specifically addresses Close Encounters.
He makes a number of other intriguing points, including that own particular brands of maths, science, music, and the arts in general were hardly inevitable. Note his discussion about Newton and the concept of mass.
This chapter of the book and indeed the entire book is a master class in advanced analytic philosophy, which guarantees that @steve_bank will find it useless.
It involves the movie Close Encounters of the Third Kind, in which string-bean aliens manage to communicate with humans via music. The claim was made that this is because the mathematical structure of music will be intelligible to all technological aliens regardless of their evolutionary background.
These claims are strongly contested here, in chapter five of a book by Norman Swartz, a professor emeritus of philosophy at Simon Fraser University. He argues that it is highly unlikely that intelligent aliens would share our taste or comprehension of music, but even more important, it is quite possible that maths are not universal and that their maths and ours might be utterly incomprehensible to each other. He specifically addresses Close Encounters.
He makes a number of other intriguing points, including that own particular brands of maths, science, music, and the arts in general were hardly inevitable. Note his discussion about Newton and the concept of mass.
This chapter of the book and indeed the entire book is a master class in advanced analytic philosophy, which guarantees that @steve_bank will find it useless.