• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Emails - the gift that won't ^&%$$^$^&*! stop giving

Clinton wants to kill. Start and end with that. She can't wait to get control of the military so that she can kill. She has never seen a use of the military that she doesn't approve of, and was the driving force behind Obama being the first peace prize winner to give us eight years of war. As much as he EXPANDED the Bush wars, it was her pushing him to do so and he restrained her from going into even more war. Clinton wants to kill. She wants blood on her hands. That sums up everything about Clinton.

The difference between a psychopath and a psychotic is that one has no conscience and the other doesn't know what reality is. Both commit atrocities, but for different reasons.

Holy shit. The above is shocking! Please provide some links for the above so that I can tell all my friends!

http://www.theverge.com/2016/7/14/12193236/pokemon-go-hillary-clinton-campaign-event-pokestop
 
Clinton wants to kill. Start and end with that. She can't wait to get control of the military so that she can kill. She has never seen a use of the military that she doesn't approve of, and was the driving force behind Obama being the first peace prize winner to give us eight years of war. As much as he EXPANDED the Bush wars, it was her pushing him to do so and he restrained her from going into even more war. Clinton wants to kill. She wants blood on her hands. That sums up everything about Clinton.

The difference between a psychopath and a psychotic is that one has no conscience and the other doesn't know what reality is. Both commit atrocities, but for different reasons.

Holy shit. The above is shocking! Please provide some links for the above so that I can tell all my friends!

The scary thing is I think you are actually serious.

linky
 
NY Times said:
In a brief ruling issued on Friday afternoon, the judge, Emmet G. Sullivan of Federal District Court in Washington, approved a motion by the conservative advocacy organization Judicial Watch to pursue its vigorous campaign to expose Mrs. Clinton’s use of the private server. In addition to requiring her testimony in writing, the judge allowed the group to depose a senior State Department aide who had warned two subordinates not to question her email practices.

Only six weeks ago, the director of the F.B.I., James B. Comey Jr., declined to recommend prosecuting Mrs. Clinton, saying that while her actions had been careless, they did not amount to a crime. Yet the controversy refuses to dissipate. This week, the bureau turned over to Congress the documents it compiled in the case, including a three-and-a-half hour interview with Mrs. Clinton, even as Republicans in Congress pressed their public case for her to be charged with perjury.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/20/us/politics/hillary-clinton-judge-emails.html?_r=0
 
In this case it is like asking me to link to support the statement "the sky is blue."

But the sky isn't blue. It is a yellow-gray. I can take a picture. You accept a worldview, espouse it and refuse to support it.

It's interesting how people associate Obama and HRC with these great conquerors like Genghis Khan and Napoleon! Sure Obama and Clinton have been more aggressive (especially in the ME) than what I'd like. However, collectively, they have conquered and held zero lands. In military actions, fewer civilians have been accidently killed than any military action in the history of combat. While it can be argued that it's been incredibly fruitless, nonetheless, their military action in the ME has been geared to support allies and prevent civilian deaths - not to hold land or take booty.

Finally anyone who tries to make the case that US military action in Iraq has expanded in Iraq really shouldn't be taken seriously.
 
But the sky isn't blue. It is a yellow-gray. I can take a picture. You accept a worldview, espouse it and refuse to support it.

It's interesting how people associate Obama and HRC with these great conquerors like Genghis Khan and Napoleon! Sure Obama and Clinton have been more aggressive (especially in the ME) than what I'd like. However, collectively, they have conquered and held zero lands. In military actions, fewer civilians have been accidently killed than any military action in the history of combat. While it can be argued that it's been incredibly fruitless, nonetheless, their military action in the ME has been geared to support allies and prevent civilian deaths - not to hold land or take booty.

Finally anyone who tries to make the case that US military action in Iraq has expanded in Iraq really shouldn't be taken seriously.

New Republic did a good job of stating the problem https://newrepublic.com/article/136164/conservative-media-can-save-age-trump

Now whether their remedies can be implemented is another story. My personal take is that there will be no change positive change in my lifetime - the feedback loop is too strong. And the internet makes it too easy to find your echo chamber and stay securely wrapped in tin foil.
 
...the internet makes it too easy to find your echo chamber and stay securely wrapped in tin foil.

That is, IMO, a huge driver of polarization in the US. It is also one reason I like this site - there are a relatively large number of reasonable disagreements around here.
 
I found a very interesting discussion on Hillary's email trouble by a lawyer who did extensive research into both the law and it's use in convictions of others. It's a podcast but there's an accompanying blog post that covers the same material, although the podcast explains it better. It's episode #13.

http://openargs.com/
 
I heard that one too, did a good job on explaining why it shouldn't be prosecuted going by current standards.
 
Back
Top Bottom