• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Cancelled results of elections in Romania, it's way worse than we thought.

 
 
 
barbos

barbos

Contributor
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
21,530
Location
Mlky Way galaxy
Basic Beliefs
atheist
Long story short. The guy who opposes western support of Ukrainian regime wins.
Ruling pro-war regime accuses russian and chinese interference via TikTok and cancels results,
....
The leak from tax office or something reveals that it was all BS. And in fact the opposite is true. I was the ruling regime who used TikTok, not the anti-russophobe guy (Georgiescu). Current regime party paid tik tok influencers to draw other parties toward Georgiescu in the hope that it will help them to win over them, instead the guy who was a joke in their opinion won.

Basically Deep State motherfuckers did a boo-boo and blamed the other guy for that
Remind you of anything? Starts with H and ends with illary.
Deep State scum has no shame.

 
Last edited:
 2024 Romanian presidential election

Presidential elections were held in Romania on 24 November 2024. A second round was due to be held on 8 December 2024 as no candidate achieved an absolute majority in the first round. However, on 6 December 2024 the Constitutional Court annulled the results of the first round, alleging that a Russian influence operation had impacted the vote. This was the ninth presidential election held in post-revolution Romania. The incumbent Klaus Iohannis, first elected in 2014 and then re-elected in 2019, must vacate the office at the end of his term, as the Romanian Constitution allows a president to be re-elected only once.
Click to expand...
 
So Georgiescu who would have easily won is banned from running becasue, wait for it ..... he expressed extremist views.
This is after they failed to stick to him TikTok nonsense and attempt to to conduct a coup with a help from 101 year old general. Democracy my ass.
 
Crickets?

So they banned Georgescu from running and have another elections and the guy who is going to win promised to make ..... Georgescu a Prime Minister. So clearly new guy is no bueno for EU ukro-nazi loving rats, but he is an established politician and the plan I think is to giorgia-meloni him into submission, whereas Georgescu was absolutely unworkable.
But we will see if he makes good on his promise to make Georgescu a Prime Minister.
 
So the Pro-EU guy went from 20% in the first tour of elections to 54% in the second.
The guy who lost went from 40 to 46 :)
And Durov says french have asked him to interfere in Romanian elections.
 
barbos said:
So the Pro-EU guy went from 20% in the first tour of elections to 54% in the second.
The guy who lost went from 40 to 46
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's how run offs work.

In the seat of Ryan, at the recent Australian election, Liberal got 34.6%, with the Greens on 29.0% and Labor on 28.2% in the first round; The commentators immediately knew that the winner would be whichever candidate was in second place, after the distribution of preferences from the remaining five candidates.

A plurality of voters wanted the Liberal for their MP; But a majority preferred literally anyone else.

It's how run-off voting is supposed to go. And it works that way whether the run-off is via a distribution of preferences expressed on a single ballot (Instant Run-off Voting), or whether there's just a second round of voting once the original votes have been counted.

Your propaganda is designed to confuse the ignorant and misinformed, so even if it works on you, you should not expect it to work on anyone else here.
 
barbos said:
bilby said:
Yeah, that's how run offs work.
Click to expand...
Yeah, loser gets 2-3x in the second tour
Winner, gets 1x.
bilby said:
Liberal got 34.6%, with the Greens on 29.0% and Labor on 28.2%
Click to expand...
You don't see the difference with 20% and 43%?
Click to expand...
Your incredulity just demonstrates your bias. Why would you expect this not to happen?

It's exactly the expected outcome when the more popular side on a given issue has multiple candidates who support that side.

Trying to insinuate that it demonstrates some kind of nefarious behaviour is despicable - unless you have hard evidence for that, in which case you should present that evidence, rather than invite your audience to join you in ignorant incredulity at something entirely reasonable and predictable.

Obvious propaganda is obvious.

Tell it to the Marines.
 
Patooka said:
Is anyone really surprised barbos has no fucking clue how free and fair elections operate?
Click to expand...
I know how elections wor. You cancel the elections if a wrong candidate wins, ban him from running again. Conduct new elections and this time you make sure that the right candidate wins, no matter what. As Ursula says - "We've got tools"
 
latest election must be immediately cancelled for the same reason the first one was cancelled.
With only difference, the reasons for cancelling the first one was BS, they even admitted that there was no election interference from Russia. In the latest one Durov said there were .... from France.
 
Last edited:
I don’t understand barbos’s issue. According to him, the only difference between this election and Russian ones is that candidates are alive and not imprisoned.
 
Comrade, your OP opens so many doors of inquiry. Excuse me if I don't take you up on them, because some Russky bastard may have painted the doorknob with Novichok nerve agent. It's happened. A ton of times.
 
ideologyhunter said:
Comrade, your OP opens so many doors of inquiry. Excuse me if I don't take you up on them, because some Russky bastard may have painted the doorknob with Novichok nerve agent. It's happened. A ton of times.
Click to expand...
Don't worry, you are the bottom of the Novichok's list. There is whole EU leadership way ahead of you, Nuland, Biden administration, Lesley Graham, his buddies in democratic party, too bad McCain is already dead. Damn, we don't have enough Novichok.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom