I think Shesh is barely toughing on the diversity in Judaism here. It cannot be said enough.
Judaism was not orthodox. Stating someone was Jewish does not narrow down what he or his religion was.
It is a vague term that whould not be used during this period in many historical context. The...
I viewed a vid once that showed a girl ripping pages out of the bible.
Here dad calmed her down and said calmly, you dont fix the bible it fixes you.
It always stuck with me. Reading it today as it was written then with all its barbaric behaviour is doing nothing but taking it out of...
This book means nothing to any historical research on Jesus himself.
It was written after 400 CE and is just a arabic reflection of the movement at a much later date.
Nothing to see here at all folks.
I understand the top part is vague, and really it should be changed.
You have to read it in context, and make your judegement after finishing.
Lower in the article it gives the dates attributed to the many different books.
Did you read the whole article?
Sources please.
NO.
Wiki covers it pretty well and gives an unbiased opinion covers all areas.
Some of these scripts are early and some are late.
Just to be clear.
The jury is still out on the authenticity of this piece.
It is in no way decided.
At best it can only give a glimpse of later followers and does nothing towards the historicity of the man or myth.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.