Search results for query: *

If the reason you can't demonstrate your predictions are true is the exact same reason why a psychic can't demonstrate the truth of his prediction that the Earth will be entering a higher dimensional vibrational plane in a century or so as told to him by Zenthar the Ultraspirit... ...you're...

...yours is 10 times lower than mine. However, the point wasn't to claim you're using a lot of energy by your personal standards, but that no matter *how little* you actually use, it's still too much when we're talking about the human race as a *whole*. You could, if you want to. But you'd be...

...species, we're either going to need to reach a higher level of technological development, or commit mass suicide. Put up, or shut up. You *very existence* threathens me. No matter how little power you *think* you consume compared to others, human civilization puts out a lot of pollution to...

...3,9% of our energy production is nuclear. Despite the precarious position the country is in, as you were so keen on pointing out, we're one of the *worst* countries in the EU when it comes to CO2 emissions. If we increased nuclear power's share of production, it would drastically lower our...

Really? A post ago you were accusing me of not knowing what was happening at this event, now you're telling me *you* don't know what's happening there...

...your various tangents in a similar fashion. It is no my problem if you're incapable of keeping the arguments straight. Oh noes. Right. *I'm* the one who isn't acknowledging that. :rolleyes: Well, 'hip' enough to not use that word in an unironic fashion, at least. What are *you* so...

I don't think you understand the terminology you're using, if you're applying them to *me*. Do you know how little this actually amounts to? The average person living within a 50 mile radius of a nuclear power will receive only 0.1 μSv a year. That's 2600 times LESS than the dose they receive...

You really don't want to use this argument, because you really don't 'use very little power'. Not unless you: Produce all the food/liquid you consume yourself. Built your own house as well as all the components that went into its construction. Produced all your own clothes and the materials to...

Whether they came from Greenpeace or not is irrelevant; what's relevant is 1) that there is by no means a *consensus* that there's been or even will be that many cancer deaths from Chernobyl; 2) that there are quite credible independent reports that list figures that aren't even a tenth of your...

Off topic, and also kind of on-topic: but isn't the Swedish 'neger' just the same as the Dutch 'neger', which simply means black person? The word has traditionally just been a neutral descriptive term (probably originating with the Spanish/Portugese term for the color black); there's other words...

...really studied the subject very well. Even factoring in all of the nuclear accidents that have happened, nuclear power is still both cleaner and *safer* than fossil fuels. The average nuclear power plant actually puts out a lot less radiation into the environment than a coal power plant does...

That's not really that odd. The Netherlands is much the same way. The elites tend to be more liberal than the masses; though I wouldn't say the masses are truly conservative as much as they are less inclined to look past the immediate concerns of themselves and those around them. Advancing the...

And it hasn't. You're looking at a snapshotted frame of a whole taken during a major humanitarian crisis, and then as if you were completely and utterly incapable of reasoning beyond the level of average redneck/chav/tokkie/insert-national-equivalent-term, blindly assume that the long-term trend...

Which is nowhere near as relevant as you think. Adding a couple of million people to the mix doesn't significantly alter the long-term projections. You're not even talking about a single percentage point difference. Migration patterns are always in flux, making short term predictions difficult...

I really shouldn't have to provide something that has been linked in these types of threads many times before and which is indeed so obvious that it's literally the first result you'd get on google when searching for muslim population projections of Europe. But for those who need to have...

Just desperate for some reason to deny that the sky isn't falling, aren't you? :rolleyes: The quoted type of arrangements are obviously included in the immigration part of the projection calculations.

There's a wide variety of reasons why Sweden's rape statistics are as high as they are. For one, the Swedish authorities count each reported act, whereas other countries have a habit of rolling them up into one charge. If a Swedish woman claims her husband raped her every day for a year, that's...

...world trends. The first reason is that black people have been a much higher percentage of the US population than black people in Europe for *centuries*. Black people represented almost 20% of the US population as far back as 1790. Compare that to all the Black, Asians, Middle-Easteners, and...

...but basic math shows this to be an absurd fear. Contrary to popular delusion, muslims and other descended-from-immigrant populations in Europe do *not* have much higher birthrates than do white Europeans. The gap is actually pretty narrow, and continuing to get narrower still. In addition...

Ah yes. The ´papers´, those wonderful bastions of fact-checking that they are. Of course, had you been paying attention, you´d know that that story has been rejected by the authorities. In point of fact, multiple authorities have confirmed that the passport is in fact a fake passport that´s...