Search results for query: *

Go for it. Do something for a change. Get data to back up whatever point you want to make.

I did not write "a decision you don't like", I wrote "explains why he thinks the lower court is wrong". Nice of you to imply something that isn't there. I'm sure grounds can be found, even if he knows the appeal would fail as well. Then he could say he tried, which would make him a better...

You have a lot of imagination.

After the 2020 election I was told how safe, secure, and resistant to tampering or stealing our elections were, and anyone who said otherwise was a right-wing kook.

According to people like Jarhyn and scombrid, if you don't vote the right way you lose your your status as a minority. I can feel my melanin draining away as I type this.

When I condemned the killing of Nawar Al-Awlaki, this forum gave me a great big "So what? Big deal." Since him killing foreign brown people isn't considered bad, why bring it up?

When murder gets your cheers Expect people to judge you Not in a good way

I think I need to expand on my previous response, where I correctly pointed out that Patooka supports the two party system while I oppose it, making Patooka closer to Trump than I am. When I found out about Nawar al-Awlaki, I considered it horrible. One of the worst things Trump could have...

You are a two party apologist, making you much closer to Trump than I am.

If you had ever actually done anything, you'd understand the importance of going through the process.

Even then.

I never imagined I'd see people in this forum oppose a tax.

Yes, I want politicians to do whatever they can, exhaust every avenue, to release those files. That includes appeals they know they will lose so they can say they made the attempt as they move to the next option. It will build stronger justification in the long run. "See, I tried this and was...

If he had appealed and lost, he could turn around and say "I tried".

That's not my burden, that's a Republican burden. You bear the Democrat burden. I bear the Libertarian burden. I criticized Trump for not releasing them, and Johnson for keeping congress out of session to avoid a vote in the issue. Find a Republican to defend Trump and Johnson on this. So...

Japan has now elected their first female Prime Minister.

Appealing the ruling doesn't taint anything. It means he goes to the higher court and explains why he thinks the lower court is wrong. Biden didn't even try that. Why didn't Biden try that? Did he want them sealed for reasons other than tainting the jury?

Then the judge should order them to come back into session. I know all about the showdown between Speaker Johnson and Representative Massie. I posted about it a month ago in the Epstein thread.

I try hard to not celebrate anyone's death, but this is so tempting.