• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Vaccines, Vaccinations Discussions

So why doesn't this give the new CDC panel assurances that aluminum is safe in the amounts given?

:rofl:

You really ask that question!

Answer: Because the new CDC panel was appointed by the moronic grifter RFK (Brain Worm) Jr.!
That's your default response, but it really doesn't answer the question.

Of course it does! Alum salts in vaccines were first studied and found to be effective a century ago! And, of course, as has been repeatedly pointed out to you, we take in far more aluminum through air, water, food and skin, than we ever will in a lifetime of vaccines.

You have no idea, as usual, what you are talking about.
 
I’m curious if anyone would watch the MAHA movie coming out?

 
I’m curious if anyone would watch the MAHA movie coming out?


:rofl:

Your ignorance is breathtaking.
 
I’m curious if anyone would watch the MAHA movie coming out?


:rofl:

Your ignorance is breathtaking.
Why? Understanding both sides will give me greater clarity!
 
I’m curious why he says the Covid vaccine is gobbledegook. I’m not agreeing or disagreeing.

 
 
I’m curious if anyone would watch the MAHA movie coming out?

Based on fact-checking previous MAHA movies that would be an unproductive use of time.
Who runs fact-checking? I'm just trying to be objective. What did they say that would make you feel watching their movie would be an unproductive use of your time? Did fact-checking believe they lied or that they were spewing propaganda with no proof of anything? I wonder why these people would create a documentary with nothing to back them up. Making a movie can't be cheap, after all. :oops:
 
I’m curious if anyone would watch the MAHA movie coming out?

Based on fact-checking previous MAHA movies that would be an unproductive use of time.
Who runs fact-checking?
Fact-checking is a process, not an organisation.
:picardfacepalm:
I'm just trying to be objective.
Then do some fact-checking!
What did they say that would make you feel watching their movie would be an unproductive use of your time?
Who are "they"?
Did fact-checking believe they lied or that they were spewing propaganda with no proof of anything?
I have no clue who "fact-checking" is meant to be, but objective reality shows that they did all of that.
I wonder why these people would create a documentary with nothing to back them up.
Money. Lots of money.
Making a movie can't be cheap, after all. :oops:
Something needn't be cheap to be profitable.
 
I’m curious if anyone would watch the MAHA movie coming out?

Based on fact-checking previous MAHA movies that would be an unproductive use of time.
Who runs fact-checking?
Fact-checking is a process, not an organisation.
:picardfacepalm:

Back at FF peacegirl told us that there were Internet Fact Checkers who would already have disproved her claims if they were wrong.
 
I’m curious if anyone would watch the MAHA movie coming out?

Based on fact-checking previous MAHA movies that would be an unproductive use of time.
Who runs fact-checking?
That fact-checking is a process, not an organisation, should be obvious from the sentence structure. You can replace "fact-checking" with a verb, and the sentence is still a grammatically correct sentence; Replace it with a noun and it is no longer grammatically correct.

"Based on eating previous MAHA movies that would be an unproductive use of time" is strange, but meaningful.

"Based on John previous MAHA movies that would be an unproductive use of time" is nonsense.
 
Back
Top Bottom