Recent content by dannyk

Supreme court halts temporarily deportations. The only dissents were Thomas and Alito........ 7-2 ruling. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/18/politics/boasberg-deportation-flights-alien-enemies-act/index.html...

Researchers I work with in Australia are applauding Harvard for it's stance. I must say I am disappointed some of the legal firms capitulated.

Based on an earlier post by Crazyfingers I don’t think there is a veto option by the president. The senate vetoed the president effectively. It’s an existing law so no presidential veto applies.

Interesting modelling here Based on the modelling these steps seem to be some form of political and economic masochism. Especially incentivising other countries to retaliate to not only improve their outcomes but make yours (US) outcomes even worse!

Just read this on hypothetical situations where Judges could independent of the executive branch and DOJ enforce a contempt ruling if needed. https://www.democracydocket.com/opinion/if-the-marshals-go-rogue-courts-have-other-ways-to-enforce-their-orders/ The article seems to miss though that...

This could possibly be a candidate for a manifestation of the 'remembering self vs the experiencing self' by Kahnemann.

I feel like you've just eroded your own viewpoint by pulling the rug away from even a basic X or Y basis. eg let me try and demonstrate... You said "XY genes + failed applying of the "male" template = Swyer syndrome -- someone who is female, although some things that should develop in puberty...

What defines the template? Isn't that the genetic code that also exists at conception?

Looks like Dixville Notch is 3 - Harris , 3 - Trump. 4 registered republicans and 2 independents. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/us-election-2024-why-people-in-this-small-town-were-the-first-to-vote/wndflidmh

I’m not clear myself based on the wording of n4 whether there needs to also be sexually explicit behaviour exhibited by said transgender person. Eg Just being within 2500ft may not by itself fall foul of that code?

I think his past behavior has been driven by that 8. Removing their influence should be a priority and then could of helped.

I think the Dems missed a trick and they should of sidelined the 8 by keeping McCArthy in the speaker role. It would of been a good bipartisan approach that focused on making sure governing is the priority.

The sane republicans missed the chance with the negative vote on the impeachment and it seems like they have abdicated their responsibilities to the legal system. I hope the legal system can do what it should. I have grave concerns if it cannot.

Yes that’s definitely no Judge Cannon!

May 2024 trial date set!