T.G.G. Moogly
Traditional Atheist
Not aware of other photos. If there are other pics maybe they will be better than the one making the rounds.Have you seen the other photos?
Not aware of other photos. If there are other pics maybe they will be better than the one making the rounds.Have you seen the other photos?
Not aware of other photos. If there are other pics maybe they will be better than the one making the rounds.Have you seen the other photos?
Find Amelia's plane and you'll find Amelia.

Find Amelia's plane and you'll find Amelia.
How could Amelia have been on Gardner Island (where a possible skeleton match and other stuff was found) without the plane in nearby waters at least?
Is there a recent well made documentary or lecture about her disappearance? Something that is not sensationalistic?
Hahaha, looked up some stuff and one was an interview with a "remote viewer"...
So, I know that the US had declared war on Japan in 1941, but when did the US start blockading action against them in any location?
Were US-Japan relations poor in 1937?
Find Amelia's plane and you'll find Amelia.
How could Amelia have been on Gardner Island (where a possible skeleton match and other stuff was found) without the plane in nearby waters at least?
Is there a recent well made documentary or lecture about her disappearance? Something that is not sensationalistic?
Hahaha, looked up some stuff and one was an interview with a "remote viewer"...
So, I know that the US had declared war on Japan in 1941, but when did the US start blockading action against them in any location?
Were US-Japan relations poor in 1937?
Good link. Thanks.How could Amelia have been on Gardner Island (where a possible skeleton match and other stuff was found) without the plane in nearby waters at least?
Is there a recent well made documentary or lecture about her disappearance? Something that is not sensationalistic?
Hahaha, looked up some stuff and one was an interview with a "remote viewer"...
So, I know that the US had declared war on Japan in 1941, but when did the US start blockading action against them in any location?
Were US-Japan relations poor in 1937?
Yes, US-Japan relations were very poor in 1937. Military experts believe that the picture was taken during the 1920's or early 1930's. Very unlikely that it was taken anywhere near 1937 due to lack of Japanese flags flying on any vessels but one and the configuration of the steam-driven vessels.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...-claims/ar-BBE2UeO?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp
Were US-Japan relations poor in 1937?
How could Amelia have been on Gardner Island (where a possible skeleton match and other stuff was found) without the plane in nearby waters at least?
Is there a recent well made documentary or lecture about her disappearance? Something that is not sensationalistic?
Hahaha, looked up some stuff and one was an interview with a "remote viewer"...
So, I know that the US had declared war on Japan in 1941, but when did the US start blockading action against them in any location?
Were US-Japan relations poor in 1937?
We have to enter into the valley of conspiracy theory to get there. If the Japanese got Amelia scenario is plausible, Earhart would have stumbled upon some secret Japanese military action that could not be compromised. The current Japanese government, which has no dog in this fight has said they have no records of contact of any kind with Earhart, or her flight. If anything, in 1837, the Japanese would likely have seen Earhart's rescue as a opportunity to gain favor with the US, and made the most of it.
The war in the Pacific is well documented. If there was some kind of sensitive military operation in the Marshall Islands at the time, it will be in the history books.
It's worth remembering, a Boeing 777 with 239 people aboard disappeared in the Pacific Ocean, only three years ago, and we haven't found a trace of them. The chances of finding Amelia after 80 years, are pretty dismal.
The History Channel program lists some convincing, if circumstantial evidence that Earhart died on Saipan. To me, the most convincing is the statement by Gen. Vandergrift, and the two Marines. As to the newly discovered photo, the analysis matching the image of Fred Noonan with other known images is also pretty convincing. It is possible that the U.S. Government denied her survival because they were breaking Japanese codes. Britian did the same thing when they broke German codes that indicated the Luftwaffe was going to bomb a major British city. Winston Churchill had the choice of evacuating the city, which would have told the Germans their codes were being read, or allow the attack (which resulted in hundreds of casualties), but allowing Britain to "go on reading the German's mail). Of course, we will never know for sure about Earhart and Noonan's fates, but the History Channel program makes a pretty good arguement.
Yes the A. A. Vandegrift letter was convincing. There would be no earthly reason to exhume two bodies on Saipan, other than to cover up that they were actually there. The whole thing smells of a government coverup. Not only were we code breaking, but the whole radio listening network could have been compromised if the government acknowledged that it knew what happened.
[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjYoNL4g5Vg[/YOUTUBE]The photo is a hoax.
Blogger discredits claim Amelia Earhart was taken prisoner by Japan | US news | The Guardian
It's originally found on page 99 of this this book from 1935. Good job, History Channel!
The photo is a hoax.
Blogger discredits claim Amelia Earhart was taken prisoner by Japan | US news | The Guardian
It's originally found on page 99 of this this book from 1935. Good job, History Channel!
They never really proved where they found it, did they?