Pollock's testimony was completely non-credible.
However he was white and therefore we see it accepted. Meanwhile Rachel Jeantel had ear witness testimony that was more credible than Pollock's. But being black etc her testimony was totally disregarded.
It really is hard to take the prejudice issue out of the discussion.
This is a good point. Would his buddy at the center have any incentive, any at all, to downplay Zimmerman's prowess? Would it help his client or hurt him to be called a vicious predator? Hmmmm.
===
And speaking of not credible, something else crossed my mind today as I juxtaposed the comments all making Zimmerman "reasonable" for noticing the kid who "didn't belong" and "looked just like the burglars."
As I recall from the photos in the community with folks walking about, quite a number of them are black. So lots of the residents of the community would "fit the description" unless Zimmerman knew that they were residents. There are a large number of units in there. Did he target them all? Maybe this is why he was constantly calling 911. And this would be another reason why it is not reasonable for him to think he should get out of his truck to follow or detain. Assuming all your neighbors' kids are thugs is no sane way to go through life.
Or does he claim to know who is a resident and who is not? And if he claims to know who belongs, they why on earth does he have to
look for a street sign to know what street he's on!?