Playball40
Veteran Member
If you're referring to Z's wounds, nonsense. I've had worse injuries from a skating fall.The former implies GZ was indeed a stupid murderer. Does that help the appearance of bias? Zimmerman is guilty of something in either case. And there is most definitely a preponderance of evidence for a beat down. What I said is also not claiming one hypothesis is correct. Most folks on this forum believe the former hypothesis to be true.You pretty much equated two potential hypotheses.
- GZ could have attempted a detainment of TM before he got away, followed by the physical altercation and wounds on Zimmerman.
- It could also be that TM attempted to put a beat down on the "creepy cracker" for following him.
The light you put Zimmerman under is that he may have overstepped a bit, then tragedy... or on the other hand, Martin tried to beat down Zimmerman brutally (of which there is little evidence to suggest that). You are definitely swaying a bias in one direction.
- - - Updated - - -
and one bullet in the chest will kill you.Bullshit - there was more than that Rhea - http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zim...heds-light-injuries-trayvon/story?id=16353532. Does the guy have to wait for unconsciousness to defend himself (if second scenario is true)? One hit in the right place on the back of the head can knock you out. You also knew your siblings and (I hope) doubted they would kill you.Nope there was not abundant evident. There were a couple of scratches on Zimmerman. He needed no medical treatment, no stitches, had no concussion. I've been beat up worse by my siblings.